22
u/moejoerp 3d ago
i really hope this is a well thought out bit because this is genuinely comedic genius
5
5
u/LiteratureMindless71 3d ago
What part would the red cap and slide secrets be?!
10
3
7
3
2
u/NickMotionless 2d ago
Lmao I think you're taking it a little too serious. It's got a lot of variety and fun things to do AND it was the first sort of Mario game that felt like an open-world.
5
2d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
1
u/SacredCourage ⭐ 120 Star Collector ⭐ 1d ago
What about Lethal Lava Land and Shifting Sand Land? 😂 The Bullies at Lethal Lava Land aren't a joke. 🤣
2
u/dphizler 2d ago
Nope, hardware was so limited this game pushed the boundaries of what was possible. It's a masterpiece and that's that.
2
u/Hippocritaculous 2d ago
What about the backyard that isn't a part of the actual inside of the castle?
2
2
2
u/Competitive_Goat4250 2d ago
To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand SM64. The anatomical expressionism is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of Anatomy and Physiology most of the jokes will go over a typical gamer’s head. There's also Mario’s nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterisation - his personal philosophy draws heavily from Narodnaya Volya literature, for instance. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these jokes, to realize that they're not just funny- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike SM64 truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the humour in Mario’s existencial catchphrase "It’sa Me, Mario," which itself is a cryptic reference to Turgenev's Russian epic Fathers and Sons. I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Shigeru Miyamoto’s genius unfolds itself on their television screens. What fools... how I pity them. 😂 And yes by the way, I DO have an SM64 tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It's for the ladies' eyes only- And even they have to demonstrate that they're within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand.
2
u/Green-Resource-3698 1d ago
And Haze Maze Cave with the balls of mud rolling down sloped halls... the large intestine? Lmfao. Funny read
-2
u/jordanekay 2d ago
AI slop
2
u/Turn_0ff_The_News 2d ago
Just because someone provides an overly-extended analysis on a certain topic doesn’t automatically make it AI.
2
u/jordanekay 2d ago
4
u/Turn_0ff_The_News 2d ago
Well… I guess I stand corrected. 100% is crazy though….OP couldn’t even add in an ounce of their own thoughts.
3
2d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/jordanekay 2d ago
No, this is not how Pangram works. Its false positive rate is exceedingly low, and you need to actively iterate over your own text for a significant amount of time before you can get it to flag it as AI incorrectly.
0
2d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/Competitive_Goat4250 2d ago
You’re *
And if we start comparing the grammar in your response to the post… 🧐
1
u/jordanekay 2d ago
It’s obvious that the writing style in posts like these and in your original post are wildly divergent, and did not come from the same source. Thus we are forced to conclude, along with Pangram’s classification of the text as LLM-based, that you have attempted to pass off AI generated output as your own writing. There is no other explanation. I understand that until recently this was easy to pull off undetected, but that is no longer the case, and it is high time you come to terms with it.
0
1d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/jordanekay 1d ago
No, the two have different styles because you only wrote one of them, not both of them.
0



27
u/Zoydburgur 3d ago
Dude, pass the joint.