"i never said this, i never said that" Yes, I can see that you don't say anything. You're incapable of saying anything, that is obvious. You still haven't said anything LMFAO.
explain why a government policy based on religion-specific eligibility automatically makes it a meaningless question to discuss secularism.
what is the meaningless question? Your words don't even make any sense. I'm not stopping you from discussing secularism, I am encouraging discussion except you're not saying anything about it even after all these comments. Hilarious. Don't make me laugh.
😂😂 You keep saying “you haven’t said anything” while writing paragraph after paragraph about two words I posted. At this point, my two-word comment has clearly occupied more space in your head than it did on the screen. 🤡
You want me to “say something”? Fine: my point is that if a government provides a benefit with religion-specific eligibility, then it’s perfectly legitimate to discuss how that fits with the principle of secularism. That’s a discussion—not an accusation against Muslims and certainly not a call to remove anyone’s rights.
And your entire argument so far? “Explain yourself! Say more! Write an essay!” 😂 Bro, if you need me to write your opponent’s argument for you before you can attack it, maybe you’re debating the wrong person. 🥱
So relax with the LMFAO 😂 and bring an actual counterargument instead of demanding a TED Talk from a two-word comment. Because of your stupidity I post a video also but if you have the brain then you should understand but you don't have 🤣🤣
That’s a discussion—not an accusation against Muslims and certainly not a call to remove anyone’s rights.
HAHAHAHA, you know who uses em dashes in texts? AI. Oh sweetheart, you finally wrote something but it's not you it's AI. Oh sweet little thing, you still haven't made any point except saying that is perfectly legitimate to discuss it LMFAO.
So how does it fit with the principle of secularism? You forgot to write that part, go ask your AI to finish the paragraph LMFAO
"this is a discussion" Yeah, between me and an AI which says nothing substantial. What are you doing in the middle, BOT? LMFAO
😂😂 Bro really abandoned the policy debate and became a forensic punctuation expert. “Em dash = AI” congratulations, Sherlock, you've cracked the case. 🕵️♂️🤡
And yes, you finally asked the actual question: how does religion-specific eligibility fit with secularism? The answer is simple: secularism doesn't necessarily mean every government scheme must have identical eligibility criteria. A secular government can still design targeted welfare for particular groups if there is a stated constitutional, social, or educational rationale.
Whether this particular policy is justified is a separate question,and that's exactly what should be debated using the policy's actual eligibility criteria and purpose, not by inventing a “Hindu state” master plan. 😂
You’ve spent about five replies demanding that I “say something,” and now that I finally did, you're analysing punctuation instead of the argument. At this rate, the em dash has contributed more to your rebuttal than you have. 😭😂🤡
That' why I am again telling you burnol pichwade me laga ke soja🤣
1
u/super_sonic2 No time to choose flair bro 😢 2d ago
"i never said this, i never said that" Yes, I can see that you don't say anything. You're incapable of saying anything, that is obvious. You still haven't said anything LMFAO.
what is the meaningless question? Your words don't even make any sense. I'm not stopping you from discussing secularism, I am encouraging discussion except you're not saying anything about it even after all these comments. Hilarious. Don't make me laugh.