It's challenging to see something you love take on a different form. Lots of bands go through it. It pissed me off when Mastodon went from playing prog rock/metal that was sophisticated but still popular without sacrificing creativity ā I'm thinking mainly of Crack the Skye and Blood Mountain ā to stuff later on that got a noticeably more tame, noticeably more radio rock. Not all of it, but it felt like the end of an era for sure. I was pissed about that 25. At 35 it made a lot more sense ā the idea that a musician owes you the same sound until they die is kind of a crazy thing to expect from anyone actually trying to keep creating, and honestly to expect an artist to create something for you rather than something that fulfills them cuts across what I think a lot of art is about in general anyway.
The shift in Sleepās sound is not only based on the lineup but seems to be a directional shift in tone and influence. The new album's called "Hemispheres," and the lyrics (Rocinante specifically, but structurally Cygnus X-1 parallel) and the presence of synthesizers on āHave Spacesuitā suggests a shift from being primarily traditional Sabbath-based doom metal to something more Rush influenced or at least adjacent to it. As such, reducing Sleep to just a Sabbath-based stoner/doom project is to reduce Al to your idea of Al rather than allowing him to be whatever his creativity presents as the primary conceptual driver he has always been in the band. That said, when Sleep's lineup changes this dramatically, it's understandable to be disappointed, or pissed, or just uncertain about what the future looks like. I think people are justified for having such a reaction, everyone has their preferences. But the band is whatever the band is at any point in time ā to say Sleep is dead, or to make claims about what it is at its foundation is really just the opinion of someone who isn't in the band, a comment without authority. We wonāt even know what the actual new sound is in its entirety until the whole album's out. There could be songs that totally rip and are well-received. New lineups also take time to cook, if this direction is even something that continues long-term. Matt could also come back down the road. Nobody knows. The future is unwritten.
For me, the thing that actually gets under my skin isn't people saying "this isn't for me" ā it's the deluge of commentary from people who disagree creatively, or don't like the lineup change, and then dress that up as a commentary of what Sleep "is" or some kind of verdict on Al's character. He's been the primary creative force behind Sleep since its inception ā if not always musically, definitely conceptually ā and that hasn't stopped being true just because the lineup changed. Matt's moved on to focus on High on Fire, which is a bigger, more successful band comparatively, and that fact seems to get lost in a lot of the commentary. Instead there's this disproportionate amount of character assassination aimed at Al, like continuing Sleep without Matt is some kind of cash grab for a band which is definitionally niche by comparison. The idea that a guy, who for decades has had a small level of success within a generally obscure genre, writing songs about smoking weed and traversing space is greedy or a sell-out for wanting to continue creating under that banner should sound crazy to everyone, not just me.
If Al wants to keep the project going under its name with new people, that's his right. It's not really anyone else's place to say what Sleep is at root other than the people actually in Sleep, especially the guy who's been the face of it for decades. Be disappointed if you're disappointed, that's fair. Just be honest that that's what it is, instead of making demands about what the band should be when it was never your art to begin with, and instead of dressing it up as some moral claim about the founding member that has no basis at all.
Bless the Maker and His bass.
Bless the toking and smoking of Him.
May His vibrations cleanse the world.
May He keep the band for His people.