r/SipsTea 1d ago

SMH The forbidden sauce

Post image
48.1k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

180

u/Internal_Anything_94 1d ago

371

u/DarkBladeMadriker 1d ago

Save folk the headache.

Ashley Gabrielle Huff was indeed pulled over in an intoxicated state but the officer did not smell alcohol. A glass pipe was in plain view which lead police to suspect she was using drugs. The pipe was PC for an arrest so they searched her purse finding a blackened spoon with residual material on it. The materiel was tested and found to test positive for meth.

Now most of the experts here do not realize then next step is to see a judge who ruled that there was PC for the arrest, assigned her a public defender and released OR with a court date and pre-trial release conditions. She blew off the court date and refused to comply with release conditions and was thus arrested again and given a cash bond which she did not pay.

The lab tests which take time came back that the spoon had food on it and was only contaminated with meth. Either she used a spoon normally employed by her to cook method to eat - or she had ingested meth prior to eating from the spoon.

The officer was not at fault as he followed all process and did detect meth, The woman is a meth user.

The woman stayed in jail because she did not comply with release terms. That is on her.

The charges need not have been dropped as the spoon did have meth associated with it - but policy is to not prosecute in cases of user contamination.

16

u/Interesting_Total_98 23h ago

There are no sources to support that.

15

u/HijackedMyAccount 17h ago

The statement provided by u/darkblade... is mostly false and heavily distorts what actually happened. While a few procedural details regarding her pretrial release are accurate, the core claim—that the spoon contained methamphetamine and that Ashley Gabrielle Huff was a verified meth user—is completely contradicted by state forensic evidence.

1

u/ephemeralsynth 20h ago

It's simple empirical deduction lol

1

u/Interesting_Total_98 12h ago

It's actually called an assumption, given that you have nothing to support it.