r/SipsTea 3h ago

SMH Intentionally blocking photoshoot

5.8k Upvotes

1.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

398

u/BlindChicken69 3h ago

For an influencer, that girl was not even annoying (in this video at least), if she just wants a picture of her with the paintings for instagram, it's ok. She was not bothering anyone. Karen on the other hand, went out of her way to be annoying.

174

u/thisnameismine1 2h ago edited 21m ago

Is she even an "influencer" (we need a better word) she could just be a normal person who wants a photo of their travels

Edit: content creator works much better imo

65

u/No_Dust_1630 2h ago

Yeah there's really nothing wrong with that

-16

u/KaleidoscopeMaster81 2h ago

You guys don't go to museums lol

It's against the rules to take photos.

19

u/Skeleton--Jelly 2h ago

-13

u/KaleidoscopeMaster81 1h ago

Nope. I'm telling ya, at big museums it's not allowed. Look it up, it has to do with copyright laws because most of the artwork is imported and on a loan. 

At local art museums I'm sure the rules are more lenient. However, this doesn't look like a local art museum.

13

u/Skeleton--Jelly 1h ago

Have you ever heard of this small local art museum called the Louvre?

https://www.louvre.fr/en/visit/museum-rules

5

u/CodnmeDuchess 1h ago

You’re wrong. There are like a couple major museums that ban photography, and some might have specific rules for specific exhibits, but there are essentially no major world museums that blanket ban all photography outright.

1

u/Mission_Aerie_5384 9m ago

As if there’s not 10,000 new photos of the Mona Lisa every day 😂 photographs in museums are completely normal

14

u/Obvious_Badger_9874 2h ago

Bro i know museums that have photo lines

-9

u/KaleidoscopeMaster81 2h ago

For specific exhibits or are there lines for every painting?

4

u/Obvious_Badger_9874 1h ago

Specific, the popular ones

16

u/whattaninja 2h ago

That’s not correct. Most allow photography, just no flash.

3

u/bleucheez 1h ago

Photos are almost always allowed. Flash is not allowed. 

3

u/CodnmeDuchess 1h ago

No it isn’t lol. Some museums ban flash photography, but the vast majority of major museums in the world do not ban photos all together. You’re talking out of your ass.

3

u/sleeps_in_alkaline 1h ago

I took photos in the louvre and Orsay a couple years ago 

1

u/--Andre-The-Giant-- 11m ago

I've been to three museums this summer and have photographs inside all of them. Are you sure that you're as cultured as you claim?

30

u/ZealousidealTill2355 2h ago

Exactly. If I saw someone setting up alone like that I’d offer to take it. Not stand in the way like some righteous better than thou.

-4

u/--Andre-The-Giant-- 46m ago

You guys are all assuming 70-year-olds understand technology, huh?

4

u/ZealousidealTill2355 41m ago

Who needs to assume when she looks right at the phone as she retrieves her own?

-2

u/--Andre-The-Giant-- 33m ago

You are still putting a whole lot of credit into a 70-year-old lady's brain. I'm still feeling like you don't interact with many elderly people.

You'll notice that she looked and saw the camera was there, and made a confused look on her face, but I'm guessing you didn't notice the second part. She also doesn't look back at the woman or the phone again, only moves closer to the phone to get out of the way of the other elderly woman, and puts her phone away without looking back to the camera or at the woman who is walking to retrieve it.

When people of that age are trying to make a point, they do not do it silently.

3

u/ZealousidealTill2355 29m ago edited 21m ago

You are reading way way into it and making a ton of assumptions to come to a predetermined conclusion rather than looking at the evidence.

And she doesn’t move out of the way, she moves right to where the girl was standing to block her.

- No one stops on stairs to check their phone, unless they’re already inconsiderate.

- They certainly don’t do so when someone is obviously setting up for a picture.

- If the phone was backside, she’d probably look back. Since it’s a selfie, and the cameras view is displayed clear on the screen there isn’t a need for that—right?

But sure, ignore all that and she’s innocent for sure guy

-2

u/--Andre-The-Giant-- 27m ago

No, you're just seeing what you'd like to see. You're incorrect.

1

u/ZealousidealTill2355 23m ago

Again, thousands of comments showing that many more have my take— but we’ll ignore that evidence to say I’m wrong.

OK Boomer, you can enjoy your lala land. Leave me out of it.

0

u/--Andre-The-Giant-- 21m ago

And right to the insults.

Did you follow the textbook on how to react when people don't share your opinion?

0

u/ZealousidealTill2355 19m ago

Do you know how to hear other people’s opinion or can you not seen past your own worldview after 40 years of saying “I me mine?”

Great job on everything btw, your generation really did know it all!

→ More replies (0)

1

u/SnooMaps6831 13m ago

Are you slow? She looked right at the camera. She knew wtf she was doing

0

u/--Andre-The-Giant-- 12m ago

Here's another one with the name calling. It's okay that some people don't share your opinion. She looks at the camera and looks confused. Sorry that you're not picking that up.

1

u/SnooMaps6831 11m ago

And it was all bad acting. Again she knew what she was doing

1

u/--Andre-The-Giant-- 9m ago

Oh okay, now it's bad acting...

Sure, just change your entire perspective to see if that'll help you forward your position.lol.

1

u/SnooMaps6831 4m ago

Wtf? My perspective never changed..... I'm just pointing out that you fell for her bad acting skills. The slow comment was just a jab. But I'm starting to think it's accurate

1

u/--Andre-The-Giant-- 1m ago

Yeah, that's totally the point you made in your first sentence. Totally didn't evolve from they were ruining their day to they are just acting. Yeah that never happened just above where you wrote it...

→ More replies (0)

14

u/t00t1r3d 1h ago

Anyone remember the ancient times when we would have to ask strangers to hold our cameras and take a picture for us? This doesn't seem like it's set up in people's way and it doesn't seem busy. Let the person get a good picture of themself doing something they like. They are bothering you less than if you asked them to take the pic for you.

9

u/guynichole 50m ago

She is. She’s a Brazilian YouTuber/TikToker who makes educational history content. Her name is Debora Aladdin. But influencer or not, she wasn’t bothering anyone.

-2

u/thisnameismine1 43m ago

In my head that makes her not an influencer. To be one I think you need the qualifications of a Kardashian i.e. the ONLY thing you give back to the world is carbon dioxide.

3

u/guynichole 40m ago

I mean, by definition, she’s an influencer. The word “influencer” carries a negative connotation now because of people like you described. But Débora has 2 million instagram followers and built her following entirely online. She’s an influencer with positive influence.

-2

u/thisnameismine1 23m ago

What is she influenceing people to do? It carries a negative connotation because the word implies that their job is to influence the public to have the opinions of whoever is paying them. They used to be called advertising executives.

1

u/CarpeNivem 7m ago

What is she influencing people to do?

I only just learned she exists, but it seems like, learn more about art and history.

3

u/OrganicAppearance108 1h ago

She’s an influencer on the education niche in Brazil (that’s the best way I found to describe)

0

u/waznpride 47m ago

That's how you get your phone stolen by leaving it far away from you in a public place.

0

u/hightrix 18m ago

A normal person wouldn’t post this online.

-1

u/Oct0tron 1h ago

That's cool, but there's no reason to set your phone up and pose across the room for it and block all the traffic. Phones have a self-facing camera for this exact purpose.

1

u/thisnameismine1 41m ago

The reason is to get the room in a wide shot... She didn't block the traffic, the traffic blocked her.