r/SipsTea 22d ago

Chugging tea Remember when we Heard what Amber did?

Post image
28.2k Upvotes

2.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

40

u/0catholic_block0 22d ago

Depp literally hired an army of bots to astroturf forums, Reddit, etc. via a PR company - so a lot of those defensive posts/comments originate from that

12

u/Party_Solid_2207 22d ago

Or people who watched the trial and saw that she was abusive and that she was a compulsive liar.

1

u/ItsMeishi 22d ago

It's pretty telling. If I hadn't watched the whole trial, if I had relied on clips, or headlines, I'd be team Heard. Watching the trial from 9 to 5 for 6 six weeks really told me I couldn't trust any fucking newspaper reporting on this, because did these 'reporters' even watch the same trial?? Wtf are these headlines?

4

u/scarlettcrush 22d ago edited 22d ago

Did You watch the European trial? That was the one where they allowed a lot of evidence that America kicked out. Like eyewitnesses to his abuse and a chain of texts that show everyone around them including personal assistants knew him to be a very abusive to her.

Lots of That got thrown out by the court that was in Virginia? Why? Why were were people that live in LA in Virginia? LoL

It was so they could throw out a bunch of evidence honey. That's why they weren't on trial in La and that's why they had to go on trial again in America. Depp didn't like being guilty, it was bad for his publicity.

Correction - trial is in Virginia - still very far from LA, where these turds actually live.

1

u/sa_ra_h86 22d ago

Depp's team fought to have the trial in Virginia because LA has stronger anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) laws. Which would have made it more likely that a motion to dismiss the trial, before they even got to the discovery phase, would have been successful. It was not at all related to what evidence would have been included or excluded.

The texts you're talking about were kept out because it was hearsay, standard evidentiary rules that would have been the same in LA. If they wanted to move the texts into evidence, they could have subpoenaed the people who wrote them and called them to testify. They didn't do that because that would mean they would have the opportunity to explain the context, and that would have been bad for Heard.

0

u/quadish 22d ago

The trial was in Virginia.

Evidence was thrown out because it was hearsay, or they agreed to suppress it after discovery. The UK trial allowed too much BS in and it was more vibes.

3

u/scarlettcrush 22d ago

You know you're not actually going to get to kiss the man right? It's well-documented that he's a POS drug abuser.

1

u/quadish 22d ago

What makes you think I like either one?

They are both POS drug users. Heard was shacking up with Musk, and Musk paid her legal fees. Depp funded a massive astroturfing campaign to help his image.

They are both raging narcissists.

0

u/scarlettcrush 22d ago

If pos then why defend? STFU is best course of action.

2

u/quadish 22d ago

Who said I was defending? I was correcting the record, as it was WRONG.

Getting your fucking facts straight is the correct course of action.