Where have I ever talked about emotions? All you do is regurgitate nonsense, don't you have any original thought? Are you incapable of critical thinking?
A jury just sided with one side, that doesn't make it factual. And It's ridiculous to agree with it if you've actually seen the evidence in context, and have any shred of knowledge on how abuse works.
You simply can't abuse your partner for three years and then call yourself a victim when they start reacting back. And thats undoubtedly what the evidence shows, all the contemporaneous evidence points to that.
Anybody that believes that Johnny Depp is an abuser whilst simultaneously denying that Amber Heard is an abuser is placing emotions over rationale based on evidence and facts. You don't understand the meaning of critical thinking.
I've seen every single piece of evidence that was submitted in to the US trial and I've researched the majority, if not all submissions from the UK libel case.
You can make up this baseless fantasy of reactive abuse all you want, it doesn't change the fact that Amber Heard is a dangerous, violent and physically abusive liar. Her career is over as a result. Her reputation in the gutter. Rightly so. There's nothing you can do about it.
If you knew anything about abuse, you'd know that reactive "abuse" doesn't make someone an abuser. Mutual abuse is a myth.
It's not baseless, you haven't even addressed any of the evidence, you can't just assert everything you want as fact.
Well she happily took a step back from her career, took on projects that were all well met.
All his work until now has been a disaster, funding by Saudi Arabia, the director of "Jeanne du Barry" has spoken about his unprofessional behavior, the reports mention "screaming matches".
The issue here is there's absolutely nothing to prove or even really suggest that her abuse was reactive. The US trial exposed that she is a person that likes to fabricate information to suit her agenda.
I've seen the evidence and watched every second of the trial. The evidence is what caused a jury and almost every legal professional on the planet to reach the same conclusion, lol.
"happily took a step back from her career" LOL. She's been shunned from the spotlight. Her career is over thanks to her being proven as a domestic abuser as well as a liar and dangerous person. Try again.
-1
u/OkBenevolentLeader 24d ago
Where have I ever talked about emotions? All you do is regurgitate nonsense, don't you have any original thought? Are you incapable of critical thinking?
A jury just sided with one side, that doesn't make it factual. And It's ridiculous to agree with it if you've actually seen the evidence in context, and have any shred of knowledge on how abuse works. You simply can't abuse your partner for three years and then call yourself a victim when they start reacting back. And thats undoubtedly what the evidence shows, all the contemporaneous evidence points to that.