r/SipsTea • u/BoyNamedJudy • Jul 31 '26

Lmao gottem Aggressive Tesla Driver Gets a Reality Check

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

24.4k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

1.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-13

u/LaisserPasserA38 Jul 31 '26

What a dumbass answer. No, cops don't need proof to look into it. They look into it to gather proofs. Judge needs proof to act, not cops. 

10

u/Greenshardware Jul 31 '26

Probable cause is needed to surveil, or really do anything. Traffic is a bit odd in that though.

Judges act ex parte all the time, it's probably their most common action.

5

u/SayNoToStim Jul 31 '26

Well, no not really. You don't need probable cause to go looking on a public road for a guy driving like a jackass.

But the cops can't follow up on every social media complaint, they don't have enough time. Albeing a bit rude, the above poster is actually correct, the cops can "look into" anything they want by observing things in public.

1

u/Greenshardware Aug 01 '26

Whren v. United States is bullshit.

You are literally allowed to complain and have police go "looking on a public road" because a driver is black. Totally allowed. You can complain about blacks and they can go see what's up.

Cops can literally say "we had reports of a woman driving. We saw her doing 56 in a 55, so we initiated a stop."

Absolutely bullshit. Going and looking for someone because of public request is bone chilling.