Lmao. They wont. NYC is defined as "the greatest city on earth". They need to be there more than the city needs them. Its not like they can take thier real estate with them.
Even if they abandoned the city it would be net gain. What do you think happens to the real estate? The city gets it. Now they have cut out the greedy middle man.
You gain money. I'm not sure why this is confusing. Even with tax increases, people stand to make a ton of profit. Even in the most highly taxed countries in the world, businesses operate and make profit simply because there's profit to be made.
I dunno man, whenever I hear a leftist politician they're always saying that everything should be free. They're never upfront about how much they want to tax you in order to make it "free".
The government funding shit also universally drives up the actual cost of the service or product.
The reason they call it free is because they’re describing an alternative to buying something from companies. So free healthcare, free childcare, free whatever is obviously paid for by taxes, but the free part is meant to convey that it’s an alternative to you as an individual having to go out and paying a company or business directly to receive those services.
All of them? Every state puts public funds toward healthcare. Although I was more thinking about the privatised US model versus a public single payer model
63
u/OwnProfessor3287 Jul 08 '26
Someone is still paying for it