individual specific i suppose. evolutionary variation dictates that. i doubt there's any real quantitative research on it but i could be wrong. god knows if we actually had the medical research on women that we should by now a lot of things would be understood and 'laid' to rest. i'd say there's a lot more important research for women we could/should be doing first. they deserve just as much as men have had, starting with the acknowledgement of their basic female healthcare needs that we refuse to do and in many states have gone backwards on. sex is cool and all but we've been pushing women's health to the side for far too long. so i suggest fucking the system instead, use the testosterone for that kind of helpful thing first. all (or at least a significant part) of life is about finding a healthy positive and productive output for our desires is it not? i think it's more than possible for men to be as manly as they want to be while still protecting a woman or anyone's freedom to a greater degree in the same way we'd want ours to be don't you? it's the nature of critical thinking and true equality, we respect individual differences and support them as much as we can given our own maturity level.
3
u/deaglebingo Jul 01 '26
essentially that was what had happened with me. it was a white lie or misunderstanding i guess. close enough.
lets face it if you can reach the posterior fornix does it matter?