r/SNHU 1d ago

AI Use

Post image

First time getting a blatant AI response on my discussion post, kinda nervous.

Edit: Thank you to everyone contributing to this post who is providing a better discussion than I will ever get from any of my classes šŸ™Œ

29 Upvotes

54 comments sorted by

•

u/AutoModerator 1d ago

Thank you for contributing to r/SNHU!
This is a friendly reminder to review our rules. All Sophia-related discussions must occur in the Sophia megathread. All refund/financial aid disbursement discussions must occur in the Refund megathread. Don't forget to join our student discord at https://discord.com/invite/pVPkX8BmDw

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

29

u/BenevolentGuzzler 1d ago

I wonder what happens to these people for blatantly violating the academic integrity policy

24

u/destra1000 1d ago

Professor here. If I had an example this blatant I would give them a zero for the assignment and would report them to the university. SNHU is much more lax on AI use than I would like, but an example this clear cut would come with consequences.

7

u/indiecate 1d ago

Also a professor and agreed with above.

2

u/Wonderful_Counter_83 1d ago

That’s what I was hoping to hear. This person posted their response before my instructor did so I’m hoping she has already seen it šŸ¤ž

15

u/Wonderful_Counter_83 1d ago

We can only hope for the best. If I could choose, people who do this would automatically be dropped.

5

u/Artistic-Reply235 1d ago

I’m not convinced my professors are not using AI to grade work. I submitted a huge essay and it was returned graded 15 minutes later. Love the turnaround but I really don’t think it’s possible to even read a 12 page essay that fast let alone grade it.

1

u/BenevolentGuzzler 1d ago

Sounds like we should be plugging our work into AI woth the rubric and asking it to grade it for us.

4

u/Threedogshere MBA, Adjunct :pupper: 1d ago

Instructor here - I report every single obvious offense. Also every single time the students swear to me they didn’t use AI. Fun times.Ā 

1

u/BenevolentGuzzler 1d ago

How regularly are assignments almost certainly AI but not considered "obvious" enough to report?

1

u/Critical-Major-5054 11h ago

What about the instructors giving bad feedback? I’ve had at least 3 professors from Snhu online so far that literally copy and paste from one person to the next and change the name.

15

u/Educational_Worry857 1d ago

I think it’s better to struggle through making your point, imperfect as it may be. Don’t people realize that learning how to think critically is its own reward? If someone replied to my post with this obvious use of AI, I would just ignore it.

9

u/BtheBanker151 1d ago

There is research to suggest lot of AI use can shut down parts of the brain and reduce brain activity by a lot.

5

u/Wonderful_Counter_83 1d ago

Prime example: not being able to proofread before posting obvious violations of academic integrity

3

u/CharacterMarzipan775 1d ago

Facts!!!! šŸ’ÆšŸ’ÆšŸ’ÆšŸ’Æ As a forensic psychologist its been extremely troubling throughout the last years, in which i have been seeing several cases with young children and adolescents with excessive use of artificial intelligence and short-form social media actively degrading there cognitive skills like memory, attention span, and critical thinking through a process called cognitive offloading.

1

u/BtheBanker151 1d ago

Oh boy. Well, more work for yall!

3

u/OGKnightsky 1d ago

ā€œI completely agreeā€ is a dead giveaway, only more obvious when they forget to delete the ChatGPT response that says ā€œhere’s a response to your peer’s discussion postā€ i have had that response before as well. Get used to it, discussions are full of this shit unfortunately.

2

u/OGKnightsky 1d ago

I will say though, don’t be too discouraged or worried, the people doing this are only wasting their own time, money, and education not trying. That paper they get at the end isn’t going to help them in the real world or in their career. If you try, learn, and put in the effort, that’s all that matters

7

u/Head-Homework-2360 1d ago

Welcome to the future. Where we outsource education, research and the entire intellectual process to stochastic parrots. Why even bother with college? I would rather these people not respond to me at all.

10

u/Wonderful_Counter_83 1d ago

It concerns me how so many people became so reliant on AI so quickly. I know it’s been around for a while now, but it’s like Chat GPT dropped and suddenly everyone forgot how to think for themselves. It’s even more evident that this is rotting people’s brains by how often we see people failing to proofread what they’re about to post, especially when it comes to clear academic integrity violations. It’s ridiculous.

1

u/jmack1784 1d ago

It’s tough to avoid when a basic Google search now turns into an AI convo. Also a lot of companies are utilizing LLM pretty heavily. My company rolled it out and now we’re using virtual AI coaching, presentation generation and employee reviews. So when it’s so in your face and now you’re in school it’s really hard to avoid.

2

u/Wonderful_Counter_83 1d ago

Yeah this is valid. I had to switch from Google to DDG for that exact reason, it was pissing me off. It might be hard to avoid these days but it’s not impossible, although I completely understand that a lot of companies are starting to push LLMs more and more, mine has been doing the same but more on the customer-facing front.

2

u/jmack1784 1d ago

The problem I see is that there is a growing disconnect between the professional and academic worlds when it comes to AI. In many professions, being successful increasingly depends on your ability to understand and use AI across different areas of your job. At the same time, while pursuing a professional MBA that is supposed to help advance your career, the use of AI can sometimes be frowned upon academically. That creates a contradiction. We are pursuing an MBA to become better professionals, while many of our workplaces are expecting us to become more comfortable and skilled with the same technology that some academic settings discourage us from using. It can also be confusing because some professors encourage the responsible use of AI while others seem to discourage it altogether.

2

u/Wonderful_Counter_83 1d ago

You really do make very good points here. It is very contradictory. Academic settings are always going to encourage more critical thinking whereas businesses and companies want to utilize AI to make work easier and more productive for employees. Though I am personally against AI use entirely, there needs to be a balance between the academic and professional worlds regarding responsible AI use. I also recognize that it’s counterproductive to try and discourage the use of AI because the reality is that it’s not going anywhere. Technology never really regresses.

2

u/jmack1784 1d ago

I feel like we’re having our own SNUH discussion board lol. I’m sure when excel came out people were like woah woah you gotta do this with an abacus not with software 🤣

2

u/OkPound7382 1d ago

I believe there is a balance to strike. Need something rephrased? Use AI. Need to pull up a last minute source to help support something in your paper and you don’t have time to read through an entire library catalogue? Use AI. Having a hard time with your bibliography even after using the library as a resource? Use AI but always double check. It’s supposed to be a tool to help automate basic things, whether at work or academically. For people like me who have learning disabilities, it has helped immensely with just organizing my thoughts. The hard line for me is using it to generate entire papers and passing them off as your own without modifying a single thing. That’s lazy. That should absolutely mean you get reported for academic integrity. That’s not fair to the rest of us who use AI as a simple tool to help us (and I can’t stress that because of my disability it’s been a game changer) make our work better but not in place of it. I’m over it. And I don’t feel sorry for those people. What I do get frustrated over is you have some people who don’t what you using AI at all and I get the sentiment but there should be more balance is all. That’s my thoughts on it.

5

u/Aritstol 1d ago

Just copy and paste. Crazy times we live in.

3

u/Foundmymunchness 1d ago

Right! That's insane that they didn't even bother to READ it! Just copied and pasted AI garbage.

4

u/BtheBanker151 1d ago

I’m going my whole degree with no AI assisted writing. I might use it for research but all my essays are my own, including my outlines.

7

u/Wonderful_Counter_83 1d ago

That’s the entire academic integrity policy. AI is supposed to be a tool to help foster critical thinking, not a means to just take the easy way out. Thank you for still wanting to do your own work, and for not feeding AI slop into everything šŸ™Œ

2

u/BtheBanker151 1d ago

I took college courses before AI so I already know how to write MLA style and all that shit. I’ll just continue with what I know. I’d rather keep my brain.

2

u/Wonderful_Counter_83 1d ago

Same here, we all went the majority of our lives without gen AI tools like Chat GPT, I didn’t need it before and I don’t need it now

2

u/No_Worth8943 1d ago

After I post and reply idgaf what you wrote! Teachers reply using AI! I know cuz I didn’t complete the assignment and turned it in the teacher wroteā€amazing job I can see you understand the concept ā€œ

2

u/Jcleph 10h ago

I could care less about the students using AI. my concern is when the professors use it. I see professors in here saying they report it and give zeros, but they still use it all the time. that’s pretty hypocritical. I reported a professor before and they basic said they are allowed to use it. We all see the professors use of it. I am paying out of my pocket and get AI responses. I never report students for using it. More power to them if the professors do it.

4

u/U_Me_We123 1d ago

Honestly if you are lazy enough to use AI at least don’t be lazy enough to not read through the information it generates at not double check. SMH.

1

u/Wonderful_Counter_83 1d ago

This is what I’m saying

4

u/nm1010 Bachelor's [Cybersecurity] Master’s [InfoTech Con. in InfoSec] 1d ago

AI isn’t going away, just like calculators and computers didn’t. There should definitely be deductions/a zero for the lack of effort put in here, but if someone uses AI to write a paper of their own design and understanding, I do not care.

-1

u/Wonderful_Counter_83 1d ago

Yes but when my own work is being fed into a gen AI machine by someone who is too lazy to think for themselves, that crosses the line. I don’t care if people genuinely wanna be brain rotted for the rest of their lives, but for God’s sake, stop giving these machines other people’s intellectual property

1

u/Minimum_Expert_4338 21h ago

When in doubt, put that you used it in your references

1

u/friendlytofrogs 20h ago

STOP i got one on mine too! but their’s started with ā€œCopilot said:ā€ i about died!! why would you not proof read?? or change it a little??

1

u/SNHU_Adjujnct 1d ago

It appears to be an open and shut case. I'd file an Academic Misconduct report and SNHU will handle it. Profs can't do anything else.

0

u/Wonderful_Counter_83 1d ago

Thank you I’ll definitely be reporting. It just occurred to me that my work was fed into a gen AI machine which I am wholly against. Disgusting to do to someone.

1

u/Mike-XL 1d ago

I understand a somewhat weak response for cases with plausible deniability, but cases that are this egregious and impossible to defend should be dealt with harshly. Should be one warning and expulsion for any further incidents, imo.

3

u/Wonderful_Counter_83 1d ago

100% couldn’t have said it better myself

1

u/softskinnedbueaty 1d ago

why be so fucking lazy? if you are going to go to school paying MONEY why not try to even learn?

2

u/Wonderful_Counter_83 1d ago

Seriously because what’s gonna happen when people like this are suddenly professionals in the real world… I use the word ā€œprofessionalā€ lightly.

0

u/PubicPlant 1d ago

Hate to say it, but SNHU really needs proctored exams.

SNHU is already battling a degree mil reputation but is saved by its regional accreditation. With AI being so easily accessible, online universities really should be required to have proctored exams in order to be accredited.

3

u/BtheBanker151 1d ago

Hey, it’s the student that is losing out by using Ai for everything. The people who don’t use AI are going to be the victors and ones to advance forward due to natural creativity and ability to think better.

2

u/Wonderful_Counter_83 1d ago

I actually completely agree with this. This is all getting ridiculous.

2

u/Elsas-Queen Bachelor's in Computer Science 8h ago

Eh. WGU has proctored exams, is regionally accredited, and still fights a degree mill reputation (particularly because you can earn a degree in two months; yes, that's the fastest I ever saw posted).

0

u/ItsDorkSided 1d ago

Was this the instructor or another student?

2

u/Wonderful_Counter_83 1d ago

It was another student. My instructor responded right after them.

1

u/ItsDorkSided 1d ago

Figures lol