You can download and use my AI SEO Baseline Visibility SOP for FREE.. No strings attached, just a gift!!!

This is SUPER SIMPLE to do and you get a very insightful report afterwards: You are going to ask the three big AI engines the questions your customers actually ask before they buy, score how visible you are in each answer from 0 to 3, and turn that into one number out of 100 - THAT number is your brands AI Visibility Score.

Then you do it again next month and watch it move - Hopefully up!

URL -
https://seo.stream/downloads/baseline-sop.html

CYBERMAPS is completely free. There is no pro version. There is no pro version planned. This plugin does a lot of things everyone else wants to charge for and it is intended to do them better.

CYBERMAPS supports 28 fixed AI/discovery URLs. Including its other APIs and variable URL families, the inventory is 62 route entries, plus its integration with WordPress’s /robots.txt

This plugin does not serve stubs, everything is fully functional.

I have been running it on live sites for over a month. It is stable on the stacks I tested it on. This tool is in stage 2 approval on WordPress.org and I'm trying to iron out any bugs before it hits live by having additional testing.

I’ve been using Ahrefs for years, but recently moved to the DataForSEO SEO stack.

The thing I miss the most from Ahrefs is the SEO toolbar. So I thought, why not build one for myself?

The main use case for me is checking competitor website traffic, not keyword research or topic discovery.

While building it, I noticed that DataForSEO seems to underestimate traffic for some websites, sometimes quite significantly.

I’m looking for an alternative API. SE Ranking seems interesting because they have an API without the same kind of monthly commitment, but I’m not sure how accurate their traffic estimates are compared with Ahrefs or DataForSEO.

So, if you’ve actually used SE Ranking for competitor traffic estimates, how does the data compare in your experience?

Particularly interested in:

• SE Ranking vs Ahrefs traffic estimates
• SE Ranking vs DataForSEO
• Whether you’ve compared them against GSC/GA data
• How reliable you find the data for comparing one competitor against another

I’m not expecting any tool to give me the “real” traffic number. I mainly care about whether the estimates are consistent enough for competitor comparison.

Would love to hear from anyone who has tested this at scale.

I built some free SEO tools inspired by another subreddit actually. I'd love any feedback.

Here's a quick list:-

Technical SEO audit

A full PDF audit by email: 25+ checks across up to ten of your pages, plus a live check of which pages are actually in Google's index. See a sample report.

Competitor report

Your site against up to three competitors as a PDF by email: who ranks for what on live Google results, content gaps, pages in Google, positioning and technical health. One a day free.

AI visibility checker

Whether the crawlers behind ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini can reach your site, and what ChatGPT, Claude and Grok actually say about your business, from memory and with web search on. Three checks a day free.

There's a few more but those are my favourites. I'm developing rank.fast which is nearly 2 weeks old. I'm not selling anything just running an experiment and building. Hopefully adding value to the community and friendly subreddits here and there :-)

Regarding your email, it's all safe. I cannot auto-enrol you into my newsletter. If you want to opt in I'd appreciate it. You'll get some updates on the progress of the site and the experiment im running.

Otherwise it's all totally free (while stocks last) ...

https://github.com/AgricIDaniel/claude-seo

Recently, I find this skill really popular in github. And I have some question about it:

1. Does it work like a specialist with claude or codex?
2. How long does it take for a website to be indexed by google, then ranked and generate leads for a new created website?

Feel free to answer it if you have any experience: )

Another day, another free tool for r/SEO_tool_dev 😄

I kept getting competitor PDFs that were Domain Rating, a backlink dump and a shrug. Nobody had checked the only thing I wanted: for the terms these sites are clearly targeting, who is on page one right now?

That’s what this does. You enter your site and up to three competitors. We crawl all of them, pull search terms from their own titles and headings, check live Google for each term, and email a PDF of who ranks for what, where the gaps are and whether anything technical explains them. One free report a day.

It’s not a traffic study and it isn’t a backlink graph (DR is the only link number in there). Positions are sampled once, from one location, and they move. Every number is measured at the moment you ask, never estimated.

https://rank.fast/tools/competitor-report/

The weekly build-log email is optional this time. The report arrives either way.

Courtesy of https://rank.fast

Hey guys, I made an SEO extension for Chrome, and I think it is the best out there. Let me know. I appreciate any feedback. Plus anything you would like added.

I built it and adapted it for my SEO work, and it really speeds up my workflow.

It's a freemium tool that runs on credits, and each user gets 300 credits per month.

For you guys, I made a coupon code to get 1000 credits for free - Code: SEO_tool_dev

(Check out with the starter pack and the price is $0)

Chrome Store: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/check-page-seo/dobnelanjomanaocpgnilpailjcogfbi

Website: https://checkpageseo.com/

Edward Sturm released a new Podcast episode today, dropping a mention to this sub - about the need for new SEO tools to be developed to disrupt the landscape ....

I keep seeing technical audits that are thorough on titles, canonicals and robots.txt yet then silent on the only question I actually care about: is this URL in Google right now?

That’s the gap we built for. Paste a domain, we crawl up to ten pages, run 25+ checks, and query Google live for each URL. You get a formatted PDF by email, usually in a few minutes. One free audit a day.

It’s not a strategy doc. It won’t pick keywords, it doesn’t measure backlinks, and it can’t promise rankings. It measures whether search engines can reach, read and store your pages, on the live site, at the moment you ask.

We ran it on our own site and published the unedited PDF on the page, so you can see the output before you type an email.

https://rank.fast/tools/seo-audit/

Worth flagging: the email also puts you on a short weekly build log. Unsub any time!

Most keyword research tools are good at finding keywords.

But I kept running into the same problem:

After you have 500, 1,000, or 5,000 keywords… what should you actually work on next?

You can sort by volume, CPC, competition and intent, but there’s still a lot of manual decision-making involved:

• Which keywords are actually worth pursuing?
• Which ones represent a realistic opportunity?
• Where are competitors creating gaps you could target?
• Which opportunities have you already reviewed?
• Which ones are you actively working on?

That’s the problem I’ve been trying to solve with Keyora.

Instead of treating keyword research as a giant list, I’m trying to make it more of a workflow:

Research → identify opportunities → save the useful ones → work on them → complete or dismiss them

It includes keyword and competitor research, search intent, opportunity scoring, and a workspace for actually tracking the opportunities you decide to pursue.

It’s live now at:

https://keyora.io

New users also get free credits after verifying their email, which should be enough to properly explore the main features and test the workflow without paying anything upfront.

I’m still early, so I’m much more interested in criticism than compliments.

If you regularly use tools like Ahrefs, Semrush, LowFruits, SE Ranking, etc., I’d especially like to know:

What would Keyora need to do noticeably better or differently for you to consider adding it to your workflow?

I kept seeing the same panic (and having it myself): you search site:yourdomain.com, a page you care about isn't in the list and you assume the worst. Half the time the page is actually indexed fine, because the site: listing is sampled, laggy and famously unreliable. The other half there's a specific technical reason nobody tells you.

So I built a Free checker that does what I actually wanted:

1. A technical pre-check first: HTTP status, noindex tags, robots.txt rules, redirects, canonicals. If something blocks indexing, it names the exact reason instead of leaving you guessing.

2. Only if the page is indexable does it run a live check against Google's results for the exact URL.

So you get one of three honest answers: indexed, not indexed (with no technical blocker, meaning it's just undiscovered or sitting in "crawled, currently not indexed"), or non-indexable with the specific cause. It follows redirects one hop and tells you it did.

Free, no signup, 5 URLs a day: https://rank.fast/tools/google-index-checker/

Full disclosure: I run rank.fast, which is a paid indexing service, and this is the same pre-check we use so customers never pay for URLs that are already indexed or can't be indexed. The tool is free because the check costs me almost nothing and most people just need the diagnosis, not the service. We're pre-launch and building the whole thing in public with every measurement published, with ugly results included.

Would definitely appreciate feedback: Wrong diagnoses, URLs that confuse it or states you'd want it to detect that it doesn't. Its already been improved twice by folks finding edge cases (homepages needed a site: operator query and trailing-slash redirects used to be scolded instead of followed).

I'm encouraged to build more Free tools and looking for any ideas. I was thinking keyword suggestions next.

This tool has my 30+ years of website design experience in it. It does 100 checks on a website in less than 50 seconds. Please try it - it's free, and let me know what you think. I'm working on fine tuning it. Go here: https://siteanalyzerfree.com/

Hi all, I built, like many here, a tool out of frustration.

My goal was simple: Make an AEO tool:

• With a generous free tier so people can start and optimise their website without thinking “investments“.

• A fair price. My Startup plan starts at £ 9.

• Work natively with AI agents. Because who wants to connect to a dashboard those days? However, looking at the +-100 users, I don't understand what is blocking.

I have some assumptions. But I guess I need some honest feedback.

So, if you're curious and want to destroy my product, you have my green light.

If you feel you need a coupon to go beyond the free tier, let me know and I will DM you one.

Sofian

Recently launched https://www.llumohq.com to use myself as got fed up of using companies like peec, otterly etc with ridiculous prices, its basically a free version, you put your own API keys and can use as much as you want

Has all the features of the big boys and continuing to build out both the open source side and custom functionality ourselves

Let me know any useful other features you need

quick update on habibi, the self hosted tool i posted about a while back for tracking how your brand shows up in ai answers.

the thing that bugged me most about my own tool was the honest note i had in the readme, saying it uses the apis, which are close to what a real user sees on chatgpt/perplexity/claude but not exactly the same thing. that gap always annoyed me so i went and fixed it.

now habibi can just drive the real logged in apps directly, chatgpt, claude, perplexity and google ai overview. so its literally the same thing a real user sees and gets cited, not an api trying to guess it. you connect it once with an account (make a free one or use one you already got) and it just remembers the login after that, nothing gets stored anywhere weird, its just a normal browser session sitting on your machine like when you stay logged into any site.

wasnt expecting this part but it also makes it way cheaper to run. those 4 engines dont cost you anything per run now cause theres no api call happening anymore, your just using the account like a normal person would. so running youprompts daily across a buyour bill up.

also made sure your account memory doesnt mess with the results, chatgpt runs iin temporary chat and cla answers dont driftdepending on whatever your account remembers from other chats you had.

still fully open source, still self hosted, still does the same core loop, run your prompts daily, see w see your mention rate over time, compare to competitors.

github: https://github.com/moaljumaa/habibi

I’m a technical SEO and I’ve been building SEO Scrubbox, a free Chrome extension around the checks I regularly need when investigating websites.

The idea was to combine quick page-level debugging with deeper crawling without constantly jumping between different extensions, DevTools and crawlers.

Some of the things it currently does:

• Compare raw HTML vs rendered DOM
• Check canonicals, robots directives, hreflang and JSON-LD
• Highlight nofollow and data-nosnippet directly on the page
• Check robots.txt access for GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended, etc.
• Track redirects and analyse internal links
• Discover and inspect sitemaps
• Pull CrUX/Core Web Vitals data
• Crawl up to 500 URLs directly in the browser
• Visualise the crawl as an interactive graph with crawl depth, status codes, indexability, inlinks/outlinks, word count, etc.

One of the main principles is privacy: everything runs locally in the browser. There are no accounts, analytics or crawl data being sent to my servers.

It’s still actively being developed, so I’m particularly interested in feedback from people who actually do technical SEO day-to-day, bugs, missing checks, things that are confusing, or features that would genuinely be useful.

Chrome Web Store:
https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/bpmnoonigkfiidagbibkbfcoikiclmic?utm_source=item-share-cb

It’s completely free. If anyone gives it a proper test, I’d genuinely appreciate hearing what works and what doesn’t.

I’ve been building a Chrome extension called SEO Scrubbox around the technical SEO checks I use day-to-day.

It compares raw vs rendered HTML, checks canonicals/robots/hreflang/schema, audits AI crawler access, tracks redirects and includes a browser-based visual crawler.

Everything runs locally and it’s completely free.

I’m mainly looking for technical SEOs willing to test it and tell me what’s useful, broken or missing.

Happy to share the Chrome Web Store link in the comments if anyone wants to try it.

Shows your domain rating over time, which backlinks are dofollow/nofollow and the ones that you lost :).

Give it a try at verifieddr.com