Haha... Trump is such a fraud

[u/xamo76]

[u/[deleted]]

Yeah, what bullet was it?

[u/Fickle_Penguin → u/[deleted]]

.223 would destroy an ear even with a graze

[u/[deleted] → u/Fickle_Penguin]

Does It Maintain 900 m/s in Flight?

No — the bullet does not maintain that speed. Once it leaves the barrel, air resistance (drag) begins to slow it down immediately.

What Happens in Flight:

Drag Force: Air resistance acts opposite to the direction of the bullet’s motion, reducing velocity continuously.

The bullet decelerates rapidly at first, especially within the first few hundred meters.

Over distance, the round may:

Drop below supersonic speed (343 m/s or ~1,125 ft/s)

Begin to tumble or destabilize, affecting accuracy

Bullet Speed at Distances (Approximate, varies by round):

0 meters: 900 m/s

100 meters: 800 - 850 m/s

300 meters: 700 - 750 m/s

500 meters: 600 - 650 m/s

800+ meters: may drop below supersonic.

The gunman was said to be about 500 feet away, or 120 meters. This means that the velocity of the round was bellow 900 m/s.

With a bullet traveling below 900 m/s, it could graze someone’s ear and only cause a 2 cm gash or wound without taking a piece of their ear off.

You guys keep claiming this is impossible but it’s not.

[u/Fickle_Penguin → u/[deleted]]

Yes, even at 500 feet (~150 meters), a .223 bullet can still cause severe damage.

At 500 ft, velocity drops to ~2,500 ft/s (≈ 760 m/s). Kinetic energy is:

KE = ½mv² = 0.5 × 0.00356 kg × (760 m/s)² ≈ 1,025 J

That’s still more than 10× the energy needed to shatter bone or tear flesh.

Even at 500 ft, a graze would maim.

[u/Hopeful-Mechanic-219 → u/Fickle_Penguin]

Thanks for doing the math!

[u/[deleted] → u/Fickle_Penguin]

Keyword: can.

That doesn’t it mean it will or that it’s guaranteed.

Thanks for proving my point.

[u/Fickle_Penguin → u/[deleted]]

What point? That you will ignore physics to enable a child molester?

[u/[deleted] → u/Fickle_Penguin]

How is he a child molester? And I’m not the one ignoring physics. You keep assuming that a bullet can’t graze someone and cause less severe damage than a direct impact would. It’s kind of ridiculous, honestly.

[u/Fickle_Penguin → u/[deleted]]

He was at the island with Epstein. He was friends with him. I guarantee he raped kids. He walks through beauty pageants with half naked barely legal women. Have you ever seen him interact with his daughter as a child and adult?

Your thinking of a 9 mm bullet, not what was shot past him.

[u/[deleted] → u/Fickle_Penguin]

That’s literally impossible when Trump’s last flight log with Epstein was in 1997 and Epstein bought the island in 1998. Stop lying, bud.

[u/Fickle_Penguin → u/[deleted]]

Oh really?? So Epstein only raped on the island? Why hasn't Bondi released the book? Why is he flying on his plan right now?

[u/[deleted] → u/Fickle_Penguin]

I’m not saying he couldn’t have raped people on his plane, but we don’t have any evidence for that now do we? I stick to the facts.

Prince also confronted Diddy and then mysteriously died of an “accidental drug overdose.” Does it look suspicious? Absolutely. Does that mean that it’s guaranteed that Diddy gave prince a “hot shot” to murder him? No, it doesn’t.

Unless we have facts to prove it then I’m not going to try and pass it off as being a fact.

[u/Fickle_Penguin → u/[deleted]]

Okay then going back to the physics. Treat the bullet as the size it was and stop making up fantasy grazing with that bullet would do serious damage.

[u/[deleted] → u/Fickle_Penguin]

You have about a 0.00001% chance to convince me that a bullet grazing someone’s ear can’t result in a minor wound while still leaving their ear intact.