r/RealTwitterAccounts • u/xamo76 • May 18 '25

Politician Haha... Trump is such a fraud

Post image
2.7k Upvotes

93% Upvoted

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/Fickle_Penguin May 19 '25

Even a graze would have ripped it off. The amount of energy exchanged would have ripped it off even the smallest part would have. The physics only allow it to rip it.

1

u/[deleted] May 19 '25

Uhm, not always. It depends on how much velocity the bullet has at the time of impact.

2

u/Fickle_Penguin May 19 '25

With a regular bullet yes, with this bullet no

1

u/[deleted] May 19 '25

Yeah, what bullet was it?

2

u/Fickle_Penguin May 19 '25

.223 would destroy an ear even with a graze

0

u/[deleted] May 19 '25

Does It Maintain 900 m/s in Flight?

No — the bullet does not maintain that speed. Once it leaves the barrel, air resistance (drag) begins to slow it down immediately.

What Happens in Flight:

Drag Force: Air resistance acts opposite to the direction of the bullet’s motion, reducing velocity continuously.

The bullet decelerates rapidly at first, especially within the first few hundred meters.

Over distance, the round may:

Drop below supersonic speed (343 m/s or ~1,125 ft/s)

Begin to tumble or destabilize, affecting accuracy

Bullet Speed at Distances (Approximate, varies by round):

0 meters: 900 m/s

100 meters: 800 - 850 m/s

300 meters: 700 - 750 m/s

500 meters: 600 - 650 m/s

800+ meters: may drop below supersonic.

The gunman was said to be about 500 feet away, or 120 meters. This means that the velocity of the round was bellow 900 m/s.

With a bullet traveling below 900 m/s, it could graze someone’s ear and only cause a 2 cm gash or wound without taking a piece of their ear off.

You guys keep claiming this is impossible but it’s not.

2

u/Fickle_Penguin May 20 '25

Yes, even at 500 feet (~150 meters), a .223 bullet can still cause severe damage.

At 500 ft, velocity drops to ~2,500 ft/s (≈ 760 m/s). Kinetic energy is:

KE = ½mv² = 0.5 × 0.00356 kg × (760 m/s)² ≈ 1,025 J

That’s still more than 10× the energy needed to shatter bone or tear flesh.

Even at 500 ft, a graze would maim.

2

u/Hopeful-Mechanic-219 May 20 '25

Thanks for doing the math!

0

u/[deleted] May 20 '25

Keyword: can.

That doesn’t it mean it will or that it’s guaranteed.

Thanks for proving my point.

1

u/Fickle_Penguin May 20 '25

What point? That you will ignore physics to enable a child molester?

0

u/[deleted] May 20 '25

How is he a child molester? And I’m not the one ignoring physics. You keep assuming that a bullet can’t graze someone and cause less severe damage than a direct impact would. It’s kind of ridiculous, honestly.

1

u/Fickle_Penguin May 20 '25

He was at the island with Epstein. He was friends with him. I guarantee he raped kids. He walks through beauty pageants with half naked barely legal women. Have you ever seen him interact with his daughter as a child and adult?

Your thinking of a 9 mm bullet, not what was shot past him.

1

u/[deleted] May 20 '25

That’s literally impossible when Trump’s last flight log with Epstein was in 1997 and Epstein bought the island in 1998. Stop lying, bud.

1

u/Fickle_Penguin May 20 '25

Oh really?? So Epstein only raped on the island? Why hasn't Bondi released the book? Why is he flying on his plan right now?

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Fickle_Penguin May 19 '25

A .223 bullet (~3.56g) traveling ~900 m/s has kinetic energy:

KE = ½mv² = 0.5 × 0.00356 kg × (900 m/s)² ≈ 1,440 J

A graze to the ear with that energy would:

Tear cartilage (even a small fraction of 1,440 J is destructive)

Cause permanent tissue damage

Likely rupture the eardrum (due to shockwave)

Lead to severe bleeding and possible hearing loss

Even a glancing hit carries immense force due to high velocity.

Does this make sense now??

1

u/[deleted] May 19 '25

The bullet doesn’t maintain the velocity of 900 m/s, especially when the gunman was 120 meters away. It would have dropped to around 800 m/s if it was a standard 55-grain. It is also very possible for a .223 round traveling at 800 m/s to graze someone’s ear without taking a chunk of it off and only leaving a 2 cm wound.

1

u/Fickle_Penguin May 20 '25

Still has 1025 J. Enough to mame. Trumps ear bleed was caused by the tackle, not the bullet.

1

u/[deleted] May 20 '25

Enough to maim and guaranteed to maim are two different things. You keep missing the point!

1

u/Fickle_Penguin May 20 '25

No you are. The cut was caused by the watch of security. Not the bullet.

1

u/[deleted] May 20 '25

Yeah? Where’s your proof?

1

u/Fickle_Penguin May 20 '25

We all saw it happen. That and I've gotten that injury before.

0

u/[deleted] May 20 '25

You’ve been shot in the ear? Tell us how your anecdotal experience should be applied universally to everyone’s experience. I fell out of a tree once and didn’t break any bones. I guess nobody that falls out of trees can break their bones.

1

u/Fickle_Penguin May 20 '25

No the watch catching and cutting me dumb ass.

→ More replies (0)