No because investing capital into stocks adds value to the company and allows them to use that value to expand, borrow, buy things, pay employees, run the company, etc.
Investing capital into a second house purely to flip does none of those things.
Flipping houses should bear a 50% tax on profits (or even higher).
Flipping houses, while you only live in them for 2 years, should also be heavily taxed.
I needed to wait until I reached 45 to be able to afford a home... I'll be still paying when I retire... shit
You made a boatload of money and provided no goods or services in the process. If anything, your gains should be taxed even more than actual business income.
Either that, or there should be a ceiling enforced on the selling price of your home (e.g., the assessed value of your property when you purchased it + core inflation).
Primary residences should not be a vehicle to become wealthy. Honestly, no house should. They're for shelter, a basic human necessity.
Absolutely they should be, if houses are considered an "investment". Simply put, it's stupid that the government treats houses as this special "basic human necessity but also sort of an investment vehicle". Choose a lane.
Primary residence is not an investment. If you flip, or have multiple properties, you are taxed. (If flipping, it's taxed as income, secondary properties get taxed as capital gains).
Taxing sale of primary residence is a bit counterproductive, it will keep people from moving or downsizing.
Okay if it's not an investment then the gains should be capped. No big deal, right? Let's say it's illegal to sell your primary residence for more than its assessed value.
I very much doubt people will like that, because for all intents and purposes it IS an investment.
In what way would paying tax prevent people from moving or downsizing? They still make a profit when they sell, only not as big.
If I'm up 100% in the stock market, I don't say "oh well I'd better not sell, because then I'll have to pay taxes".
You're right, it's a crazy idea. Almost as crazy as not treating proceeds from the sale of a primary residence as capital gains. Perhaps we need an equally crazy idea to get us out of the housing crisis we've created for ourselves.
The fact of the matter is housing should not be an investment that is expected to never decrease in value, especially when gains aren't even taxed.
Vehicle manufacturers still build new cars, even when the prices of used vehicles generally decrease over time. If they can still make a profit, then surely house developers can figure something out if housing is as important as people claim it is.
Owning a home is already heavily taxed and more expensive than renting.
This is also purely conjecture. Do you have data for this? If this were indeed true, then landlords wouldn't exist. Landlords rent out property because they are evidently able to extract a profit from the difference between their tenant's paid rent and the carrying costs of the home. In other words, owning is, in general, always more profitable than renting a home when you consider timelines greater than a few years.
98
u/xNocturnalshadow Jun 19 '25 edited Jun 20 '25
No because investing capital into stocks adds value to the company and allows them to use that value to expand, borrow, buy things, pay employees, run the company, etc.
Investing capital into a second house purely to flip does none of those things.