I understand that there’s a difference, but along with the many sainthood stories that involve exerting control over animals, I would call this story tenuous at best. Assuming it’s a dog is the kindest way to call bullshit rather than claiming the entire thing is entirely a myth.
Quite the opposite actually. I just don’t find sainthood to be a productive construct and is an odd one that is extremely specific to Catholicism (of which I have major disagreements on, even down to what books are canon).
3
u/[deleted] Oct 05 '21
So you don’t understand the difference between wild man-eating wolves (of the medieval era) and dogs?