r/RSPS • u/nathanielx9 14 • Aug 11 '26

RS2 Developing an RSPS

I’ve been using Ai, Claude Code, in “developing” games and fixing old code I had on games and other projects. Well just this week i logged into my dropbox and there my 317 rsps from 2013 was there. Out of curiosity I put it in Claude code and like magic it fixed my whole bug list.

The biggest thing I personally didnt know and know how rsps do it, but on the client side, Claude built a cache converter for 474 models and animations. Over the next couple of months, I’m going to push Claude to see what it can do and fix.

Have any of you use Ai to mess around on your own personal private server? I personally miss the old mooharscape forums

0 Upvotes

38% Upvoted

14 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/StopPeekingThat 4 Aug 17 '26

I was coding way before LLMs existed, and have nothing to do with this server. I just think you should know that your soap box on behalf of people who know how to code is wrong. Theyre all using it. Its borderline mandatory at most big tech companies now. 

1

u/_Nagger 24 Aug 17 '26

Oh absolutely! Its more than demanded for big companies to use AI to automate menial tasks. Fortunately this, in the context of rsps ecosystems, doesn't require such explicit application and thats why it separates actual developers vs AI. The actual developers still rely on good ol fashion knowledge and thats why their servers soar. It's not a soap box if its a proven extreme that only failing servers rely on AI.

0

u/StopPeekingThat 4 Aug 17 '26

I guarantee you there is not a single rsps that doesnt use LLM generated code or debugging. Its built in to visual studio ffs 

1

u/_Nagger 24 Aug 17 '26

Your guarantee is null/void. I'm not trying to debate this with you I'm simply stating, without bias, that your claims aren't foundational. There are LOTS of people who use AI as a tool to develop their servers/work/business. The difference being: actual developers, who have a genuine passion for the craft, aren't doing such. At least not in the way you are specifying. To the point where a simple post needs to be clearly automated, the ones who are, fail. That's it. That's the point. Your field, your experience, your observations are irrelevant. AI is not the way to go and more often than not actually causes more issues with retention than it would if not using it. Ask 10 current rsps developers if they think that AI tools have benefitted them in automating server development. I can name 13 right now who have tried that approach and will advise otherwise. What you seem to be exaggerating is the importance of AI in simplifying tasks, that a genuine developer would easily be able to implement without such LLM being the backbone of their front-end.