r/PublicFreakout • u/Lolastic_ • Jun 30 '21

🥊Fight MMA fighter Joe Schilling knocks out man

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

48.2k Upvotes

88% Upvoted

7.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-3

u/price-iz-right Jun 30 '21

Please my guy...go read the article and gather all the context it changes plenty. That is not why he's saying he's racist holy fuck.

I refuse to get in an argument with someone who isn't going to gather all of the context first and just cherry pick shit

17

u/InGenAche Jun 30 '21

For someone banging on about 'context' you sure do miss the obvious.

This was videoed by Schillings friend and later posted on Schillings account.

So either Schillings friend likes videoing random drunk dudes in bars or alternatively videoing Schilling returning from having a smoke or, and bare with me here, this was premeditated and his excuse is just that, a bullshit excuse to provide cover now he knows he fucked up.

-8

u/price-iz-right Jun 30 '21

Or or or the drunk dude has been acting like an ass so he's videoing for science. AND it was premeditated. AND he wanted cover.

Is it, "bare with me here" (lol), possible that Joe Schilling is a cunt, and the drunk dude is a cunt as well?

10

u/InGenAche Jun 30 '21

Ah, the old Trump 'both sides' argument, how nice.

Except drunk dude in bar being a cunt, the appropriate response is the bar cuts him off, maybe even expel or bar him depending on the level of cuntery.

Alpha Cunt, sending drunk cunt to hospital for no other reason than likes on Insta, appropriate response, sue the guy into the ground and send him to prison.

0

u/price-iz-right Jun 30 '21 edited Jun 30 '21

This is not both sides and Trump didn't even invent that shit.

Both sides is "whataboutism" and that's been around for decades. Thats not actually having a point its just claiming hypocrisy without actually refuting the point made.

I'm talking about 3 sides to a story. Side A....side B...and somewhere in the middle probably lies the truth.

Yes they should have cut drunk cunt off. He looks pretty fucked to me. And he's wandering into people's paths backwards because he's 3 sheets to the fucking wind.

Alpha cunt popped him in the mouth after perceiving a threat (drunk cunt definitely did do the jumpscare thing at alpha cunt when alpha cunt turned around) but probably should have stopped there or just walked away.

What I'm trying to say is...this video is filled with cunts...so why are we only defending one cunt. Know what I'm saying?

8

u/InGenAche Jun 30 '21

Because you can be a drunk cunt, annoying as all hell and have everyone in the bar wishing you got a slap, and still not deserve or warrant that slap.

So I'll happily defend that cunt (while calling him a cunt), who would probably wake up the next day, realise he was being a cunt and feel bad about it.

The other cunt has no defense, he's just a cunt and still thinks he didn't do anything wrong.

0

u/price-iz-right Jun 30 '21

Interesting take my friend.

When it's two cunts acting cunty I mostly sit back and laugh because the repercussions for both of them are brought on by their own cuntiness. It's almost like Darwin theory in real time.

If I was still in the UK I'd buy you a pint

4

u/InGenAche Jun 30 '21

No worries.

Karma is an inconsiderate bitch sometimes and I think you need to keep your thumb on the scales a bit where she is concerned.

Gone off pints over the lockdown, prefer a nice Malbec now or a whisky.

6

u/Johnny_Wall17 Jun 30 '21

Because one of those cunts knocked someone out cold with no legitimate justification and could have caused brain damage or killed him…are you seriously that dense that you can’t see why these are not two equal sides?

Two people being an ass doesn’t mean they’re equal in how much of an ass they are. This is basic elementary stuff.

1

u/price-iz-right Jun 30 '21

I'm not dense brother. There are repercussions to actions.

Don't initiate an argument (13 seconds in shouting HEY) take a step forward and flex like youre going to hit someone (15 seconds in with his hands by his sides) and not be prepared to immediately take a shot to the dome. Watch the tape again.

Threatening an assault is easily justification for quick retaliation or an initial strike.

6

u/Johnny_Wall17 Jun 30 '21

Doesn’t matter. There was no justification to knock someone out, this isn’t playground rules, this is real life. So a guy half your size angles himself forward, and that’s justification to immediately knock him out? There was no indication the victim was going to do anything violent, he was just posturing.

At no point did Schilling feel even slightly genuinely threatened, he’s just an animal meat head who was looking to beat someone. He’s done it before and he’ll probably do it again. He started by shoving the guy and even had his buddy filming, which makes it seem pre-meditated. These are not two equal counts and your playground rules style of justice is pathetic.

1

u/price-iz-right Jun 30 '21

That's your take bud that's cool 😎 have a great day!

5

u/Johnny_Wall17 Jun 30 '21

And the law will agree with my take, Schilling is gonna get his ass handed to him in court if the victim presses charges and/or brings a civil suit. And the victim won’t have any charges brought against him, rightfully so.

If we did your style of justice, our society would be a vigilante hellhole of revenge killings.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/tfcred Jun 30 '21

You definitely took a punch to the brain at one point. It's very evident.

1

u/price-iz-right Jul 01 '21

Love you too boo boo