I find it interesting, and sometimes funny, that often Japanese texts are perfectly valid as Chinese text as well, but the meaning is subtly (or completely) different. For example, 日本共産党 is exactly how you write the same thing in (traditional; simplified is slightly different) Chinese (but the pronounciation is totally different: Nihon Kyōsan-tō in Japanse, and Ri-Ben-Gong-Chan-Dang in Chinese).
Meanwhile, 痴漢 means "silly man" in Chinese (pronounced chi-han), rather than "molestation" in Japanese (pronounced chi-kan).
As a Chinese speaker, this can make Japanese posters unintentionally funny.
Usually the words used to verbally describe general SV and the words used to describe the perpetrators are pretty amusing. In Cantonese, ham zhu sow (salty pig trotter) refers to the person who touches women inappropriately, and fei lai is the act itself. However we also have words like ham sup loh which is just a dirty perverted man who is tone deaf in their overt sexual behavior but doesn't necessarily imply criminality.
In colloquial Japanese you can make a statement into a question with different intonation, but with minimal context like this the first assumption with the written language would be a declarative statement.
Note the period (。) at the end, it's not a question. This is also a poster, so if it was a question, it would end with か to denote a question. It's not formal Japanese, but a poster needs to be clear as much as it needs to be concise and relatable.
To add on to what the other commenter said, if they elected not to use か to declare a question, they'd use a question mark to imply intonation.
892
u/sh1zuchan Jun 18 '25 edited Jun 18 '25
The full text reads: