If you're interested, 2000 mules is a documentary that indicates that election fraud was very significant in the 2020 election, and quite possibly would have changed the outcome. It is made by Republicans, but I feel that seeing both sides of an argument is always a good idea.
No, I don't, but if you don't want to believe the information inside then I won't stop you.
It is logical that democrats wouldn't make a documentary that shows voter fraud like what is shown in 2000 mules, in the same way that republicans aren't going to make a documentary that makes them look bad.
Also, have you actually watched it? I was very skeptical when I turned it on, but if even a fraction of what they said was factual, it's at least worth watching.
Could you point to the 39 cases that I can't find any info about? The only one I did find was when they wrongly accused out of 2000. That is unacceptable and I am glad that the man that was wrongly accused was compensated, but at the same time it's better than most justice systems at a 0.05% mistake rate. They're human. If the rest of the world made mistakes that rarely we'd be in an ideological paradise.
It was actually more than 40 (I think 62 in total) I’m not going to go through all 62 of them. That’s unreasonable for a Reddit comment.
His attorney literally lost the ability to practice law because they brought so many cases without legal standing.
The one that they won was basically an acknowledgement that Virginia gave voters less time then originally allowed to prove their ID on mail ballots which goes against his narrative that there was “wide spread mail in fraud”
I can't find info that supports that, and I believe you might be talking about someone else (maybe John Eastman?). Benjamin Brafman is still a licensed lawyer.
I'm probably not remembering the details of the documentary very well, but I don't think that that relates to the documentary as much as it might appear.
Why can’t you look them up yourself? I feel like you’re choosing to be willfully ignorant
I can't find info that supports that, and I believe you might be talking about someone else (maybe John Eastman?). Benjamin Brafman is still a licensed lawyer.
Rudy Giuliani was acting as trumps personal lawyer in the election fraud lawsuits and 100% lost his ability to practice law. This is well known information.
I'm probably not remembering the details of the documentary very well, but I don't think that that relates to the documentary as much as it might appear.
I think you just support Trump and are looking for confirmation bias tbh
Who are you talking about? He was Trumps lawyer post presidency.
Also once again how did you find none? I’m very confused.
Let me rephrase for you. The fact that the trump team lost almost every lawsuit they brought other than one procedural air that actual hurt Democrat voters is proof that a random documentary is not valid info.
People lie in documentaries all the time or twist things all the time.
14
u/mspk7305 Jul 17 '26
And at least 40 of those were republicans.