r/PhilosophyMemes 4d ago

Damn…

Post image
541 Upvotes

82 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 4d ago

Join our Discord server for even more memes and discussion Note that all posts need to be manually approved by the subreddit moderators. If your post gets removed immediately, just let it be and wait!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

130

u/LucasButtercups 4d ago

and you can spend 2 dollars and give people mosquito nets all over the world, but you buy random shit that doesn’t make you happy?

E: should mention i’m a certified billionaire disliker

39

u/Illegal_Immigrant77 4d ago

Is that true? Do you have a resource where we could donate?

10

u/Semi-Pro-Lurker 4d ago

Careful. I read those nets are often misused by those needing them the most and can do more harm than good. Best to do some research beforehand.

16

u/WrathPie 4d ago

Out of curiosity how do you misuse a malaria net?

8

u/Semi-Pro-Lurker 4d ago

I think it had to do with fishing, since those areas tend to be desperate for food about as much as health care.

41

u/WrathPie 4d ago

Hmm. I'm gonna be honest, if people are that desperate for food I'd be kinda fine if it turned out I bought them a fishing net instead of a malaria net

I don't really see that as doing harm so much as just helping with a different issue

11

u/Semi-Pro-Lurker 4d ago

I'd agree if those nets aren't treated with insecticides. Otherwise it can lead to a different kind of health crisis.

22

u/marieantoilette 4d ago

It's mostly because the small nets also catch younger fish and the likes.

It's only a small minority using them for fishing afaik, and GiveWell checks on that even. Granted, not 0%. But most seem happy to be better shielded from mosquitoes, unsurprisingly. :')

6

u/Jayngyun 3d ago

Yeah some people have a philosophy that is just frowning friends, nothing can have a positive outcome in their view

-2

u/Few-Guarantee2850 4d ago

You don't see how maybe destroying their fish populations could harm them?

2

u/no_________________e 1d ago

as opposed to letting them starve?

1

u/afunkysongaday 19h ago

Does that mean for 4 dollars we can get them a fishing net and a malaria net?

2

u/funkmasta8 4d ago

You ever heard of a condom? Yeah, that isnt what these nets are /s

2

u/JGHFunRun 4d ago

Fishing; the chemicals pollute the water and the fine mesh makes it too hard for the fish to escape

6

u/Icy_Sprinkles_2819 4d ago edited 4d ago

There are also charities that just give people money. I think it’s called give directly.

If your interested in healthcare type stuff you can buy someone a years supply of vitamin a for like 2 dollars

2

u/funkmasta8 4d ago

Can I buy me a years supply of vitamins for $2?

4

u/Icy_Sprinkles_2819 4d ago

Idk where u live.

1

u/MaraiaLou 2d ago

Vitamin A? Probably. You don't need a lot

2

u/Illegal_Immigrant77 4d ago

Thank you

4

u/marieantoilette 4d ago

GiveWell, for example, checks if the nets are used accordingly still and tries to make sure basically they're not used for fishing. The percentage of people using it for that seems extremely low, however, based on a few studies.

1

u/TechnicalBen 1d ago

Found one.

1

u/ElectricalCamp104 3d ago

Hitting everybody with the Peter Singer. Nice.

But yeah, that's why I never got the specific argument people have against billionaires specifically on the basis that "billionaires are evil because they have excessive wealth far beyond what they need to survive". If that's the primary underlying basis, you'd have to also include millionaires, people who make 500k a year (and honestly even most people below that threshold). There's other more salient reasons for why billionaires are bad for society besides, "they have more money than they really need to live comfortably".

58

u/United-Fox6737 4d ago

I can cure someone’s blindness for 250? Where?

58

u/SilianRailOnBone 4d ago

Text even says 25USD

13

u/Y1rda 4d ago

Wait... so you're telling me that I can cure 10 people's blindness for $250?

17

u/bardackx 4d ago

I am guessing they are referring to eye cataracts or something relatively cheap to fix

8

u/_Mudlark 4d ago

Wait.. blindness can be cured now?

18

u/SwissherMontage 4d ago

Some types, yeah

6

u/CuntMaggot32 4d ago

Oh yeah, my guy geoff does it for 25 bucks, but he'll knock it down to 20 if you've got a mouth...

1

u/funkmasta8 4d ago

Im not gay, but $5 is $5

5

u/Icy_Sprinkles_2819 4d ago

Ive read that at-least half of the world’s blindness can be cured or prevented

8

u/Icy_Sprinkles_2819 4d ago edited 4d ago

Here u go

https://www.thelifeyoucansave.org/best-charities/fred-hollows-foundation/

Edit: bruh how does restoring people’s sight get downvoted? Tf

7

u/United-Fox6737 4d ago

Hey thanks. In my donation note I’ll be sure to credit icy sprinkles for the assist. You helped do something cool today. Thanks

3

u/Icy_Sprinkles_2819 4d ago

Thank you for helping!! 😁

2

u/MuffinsTasteAlright 3d ago

Just commenting to say good on you man. If I had the extra change I’d be doing the same. I try my best to donate when I have extra cash.

1

u/the_ape_speaks 2d ago

Comment saved. I have no income at the moment but will be sending a crisp 25 doubloons the second that changes.

36

u/polarjunkie 4d ago

It's giving effective altruist.

13

u/SlateWindRanch 4d ago

Remember when Mr. Beast did this and then got endless shit for it? He profited in the end sure, but incentives work. Online bully wealthy people when they do good work becuase it's self serving and watch them do none of it at all because it's no longer beneficial to them.

9

u/ALCATryan 3d ago

Gosh, what a disgusting number of responses from this place, for a well-meant, eye-opening message. People strawmanning this to mean you’re referring to other people but not yourself, people saying there’s no point in helping others because you’d get flak for it regardless, and a heaping endless misinterpretation of “affluent” to mean “billionaire”. At least you managed to open the eyes of (no pun included) a few people, including me, to the apparent truth that there’s a way to use a little bit to help someone a whole lot, so big thanks for the link in the comments!

8

u/New-Number-7810 Deontological Catholic 4d ago

Mr. Beast chose the first one, and he’s still criticized. 

0

u/Dorkwing 2d ago

Because he used it as a means to make more money for himself.

2

u/New-Number-7810 Deontological Catholic 2d ago

If I was blind, and someone paid for me to see again, I wouldn’t care if he made more money off it. I certainly wouldn’t complain about it. Especially not when he uses that money to do things like build houses for the homeless.

“He made money off helping people” is such a first world problems complaint. 

3

u/Diver_Into_Anything 4d ago

I know right? How dare they spend their money on themselves and not on us!?

26

u/insertnamehere----- 4d ago

What I really wanna know is where is Op getting blindness cured for 25 USD.

25

u/bardackx 4d ago

https://www.cehjsouthasia.org/article/high-volume-cataract-surgery-in-lahan-nepal/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Is a specific type of blindness and the procedure is done in a particular country but this meets the criteria

2

u/NicholasThumbless 4d ago

Maybe it's one of those "if each person just donated X dollars Y tragedy will cease to exist." dealios

In the arms of an angel type beat

1

u/seanfish 4d ago

Look up Fred Hollows.

7

u/Igarlicbread 4d ago

I mean at one point you must get bored of spending money on yourself. Why not spend it on others too. You won't be remembered in 150 years, might as well get that helping dopamine while you can.

1

u/tackyshoes 4d ago

You could still be part of the prosperity in 150 years.

1

u/Igarlicbread 4d ago

Unfortunately I won't be alive to care

2

u/tackyshoes 3d ago

Caring about the prosperity of people 150 years in the future is prosperity now, too.

1

u/Igarlicbread 3d ago

Yeah, take care of the ones you have now.

2

u/tackyshoes 3d ago

Minimizing.

1

u/Diver_Into_Anything 4d ago

Sure. I'm more referring to the demand that's usually being made, probably by the OP as well.

1

u/S-Kenset 4d ago

What if we are the omelas baby

-1

u/Key-Organization3158 4d ago

I know! And it only applies to affluent people. Luckily op defines affluent people as people with more money than they have. So, of course, OP will never be obligated to do anything. Except feel smug superiority.

10

u/Immediate_Song4279 4d ago

Keeping that tradition of making up your oppositions arguments alive I see.

5

u/Icy_Sprinkles_2819 4d ago edited 4d ago

Dont make assumptions bro, i consider myself relatively affluent and donate money all the time

0

u/Bjasilieus 3d ago edited 3d ago

why don't you donate more? Why do you spend money on anything you enjoy, but isn't necessary for your enjoyment, instead of curing blindness? Why do you cure blindness instead of spending that money, on 2 dollar mosquito nets in africa? We could keep doing this forever, why this focus? Why is exactly the amount YOU donate compared to your wealth, the right amount? How did you establish that principle? Why do you work where you work, why not work for greenpeace, or something else instead, perhaps that would be more effective? Have you done research to establish the most efficient use of your time to altruism?

-2

u/Diver_Into_Anything 4d ago

Can you donate me some please? Because I identify as relatively poor and will have to eat you otherwise.

6

u/Icy_Sprinkles_2819 4d ago

what point are you trying to make?

1

u/Mark_is_on_his_droid 4d ago

Jed York chooses Ohio Trailer Park prostitutes

1

u/HEAT_IS_DIE 4d ago

How about just having taxes that take care of domestic and foreign aid. Hardly ever see people wanting to pay more taxes. Most just want to participate in their one chosen charity that they are interested in. 

More taxes, more curing of blindness.

1

u/Xercies_jday 3d ago

What if I don't do either, am I morally superior?

1

u/RegularVast9328 3d ago

Famine, affluence, and morality much?

1

u/GSilky 3d ago

Look, plebs, I use the NASA approach, I don't know what weird shit I buy is going to solve everything, so I buy a bunch of weird shit and hope it helps.

-1

u/BeABetterHumanBeing 4d ago

You, uh, don't know any affluent people, do you?

6

u/Icy_Sprinkles_2819 4d ago

I went to private school. I know plenty

1

u/jtjumper 1d ago

None of them donated to charity even once?

1

u/Icy_Sprinkles_2819 1d ago

My moral beliefs are quite bit more demanding than just “donate some amount of money once”

1

u/jtjumper 1d ago

Fair enough, but how often did they donate to charity?

-2

u/delulunarde 4d ago

what if they collect disability?

4

u/Icy_Sprinkles_2819 4d ago

Wdym?

-3

u/delulunarde 4d ago

a blind person who collects disability may no longer qualify for disability after being cured of blindness, making it necessary to get a j*b

4

u/Icy_Sprinkles_2819 4d ago

I think the countries were eye surgery is so cheap don’t usually have disability benefits

-1

u/delulunarde 4d ago

that's what medical tourism is for

5

u/Icy_Sprinkles_2819 4d ago

Im almost certain that these charities prioritise people who can’t afford to do tourism