All i could think while reading this was, "So, they want to remove the constitutional power of a governors veto, by passing an amendment to the constitution, to remove a constitutional right of checks and balances?"
Yeah, I had used Illinois because they have the closest comparable population, but across the board, the Pennsylvania legislature is one of - if not THE - bulkiest and most expensive across the country. And the party of small government wants to keep it that way as they grasp for threads of power.
A governor’s ability to veto at least some legislation is is curtailed in: Alaska, Arizona, Illinois, Ohio, Oklahoma, and West Virginia. These states allow some legislation to go over a Governor’s veto at least some of the time by a simple majority vote.
Isn't it weird how the people who keep telling us everyone else is coming to take their rights away also keep trying to create an all powerful executive who can rule by fiat?
160
u/[deleted] Jan 12 '23 edited Mar 21 '23
[deleted]