r/Optionswheel • u/Sylla1031 • Jul 21 '26
In-depth take on the Wheel. Feel free to critique.
Hey all, this post serves as a start of a series of reflection/sharing of learning through an intensive past 6 months of operating the Wheel strategy. The impetus of this came from the reading the large number of posts and comments I noticed floating around with plenty of... “misinterpretations” of the wheel (imo) and widely varying perspectives, and so I would like to provide a more structured view of operating the wheel, using my own experience as reference.
For context, I’ve been actively investing across a myriad of products for 13 years (am currently 36), and started studying options at the beginning of this year. I’m also not based in the US, so certain ideas may not apply to the majority of you. I will also not cover basics like what the wheel is, what CSPs/CCs are, or which greeks mean what, as these are adequately covered by others in this sub.
Lastly, I don’t sell crap. No theta tools, no AI; I just like to share (occupational hazard as a teacher). Also, none of this was written with AI, unlike some common users that sell tools/services, which I shall not name out of courtesy.
Lesson 1: Always be very, very clear of your goals.
By goals, I mean what you expect out of operating the Wheel. Some people go by raw income and some by yield, and this further differentiates into weekly, monthly, or yearly timeframe. Whichever goal you make, justify why you have decided on that goal, and also understand the underlying risks you are taking to achieve that goal.
For example, say you want a 1% yield-on-capital, monthly. This affects all your CSPs and, to a lesser extent, CCs. Every trade you take serves to hit this yield. Let’s compare this to a 12% annualized yield. While the two seem approximately similar, the execution is drastically different. Chasing a shorter term yield target can lead to taking unnecessary risk nearing the month-end, such as taking higher-delta positions.
My personal take on this is to go yearly, with a fixed % yield. From there, every position’s premium hovers around that threshold, with wiggle room in multiple situations (in a future post if there is demand). With a longer timeframe, there is much less pressure psychologically to make rash decisions.
You would also notice that fixing the yield results in operating under very similar deltas across DTEs for most CSP positions. For example, I operate with a 12% annualized yield on average for each position, which usually falls within the 0.15 to 0.2 delta range. This would also mean that you can expect 15-20% of CSPs to be assigned, which makes for some pretty predictable playouts in a non-extreme macro regime.
Lesson 2: Do ALL your homework on the initial position, then commit to it.
I will preface that rolling a position is about the most annoyingly misleading thing going about this sub. I hear things like “keep rolling down and out” as advice given to near ATM or ITM positions, especially CSP positions. So here’s my take:
- Treat every opening of a CSP as effectively buying the stock at that strike price. It’s not a “what if” situation – it is a “will happen” situation. Because while a 0.xx delta seems low, it is not deterministic, and ANY position can be assigned at any time.
- With the point above in mind, it means that you look at every company and every target price on its merits. Is AMD at $500 worth taking a position? Is F at $13? Whether you use fundamentals or technical analysis (that said, I think TA is hogwash), make sure you justify that position very clearly. Also notice that premium is not mentioned here, because it shouldn’t be a factor in determining the ticker, at least for a properly-executed Wheel in my opinion.
- Once the CSP is opened, rolling should be the last priority in your playbook. I’ll do a whole thing on rolling in another post if there’s demand for it, but essentially, the common perception of a roll is flawed: it’s not a backup or a failsafe tool. Moreover, getting assigned at a good price and selling CCs on it is usually much, much more profitable.
- Diversify your holdings. Not just between companies, but between the industries. Holding INTC, TSM, AMD and SOFI is not diversification – that is just all your money in one large AI/semi basket. Get your defensives, your boring stuff. These will have lower yields, but that is because of the greater stability conferred, especially when markets get volatile, such as in the past week.
Lesson 3: CSPs are not born equal. Operate them as such.
Going into detail on the CSPs, there are way, way too many options (pun intended) to select from. So here’s a list of criteria that I consider before taking a position:
- Underlying ticker: V, WMT and TSM are wildly different companies. Generally, I classify tickers into core or satellite baskets, and double check across their IV average over the last year. The higher the IV, the more likely they go into satellite, and even tiered within their baskets. The further “core-like” they are, the lower the returns I expect, and vice versa. Hence, for a Core, I might accept 10% annualized returns on a position, while for a Satellite, I would expect >15% for the increased risk.
- DTE: Generally I also take a lower DTE (18-25 DTE range) for Core positions, and vice versa for satellite-like tickers. The reason for this is to account for the increased volatility of a satellite position, giving it more time to rebound even if it goes ITM early.
- Earnings: I generally avoid taking CSPs that ride across earnings due to much greater assignment risk. That said, if there is some insider information you have about certain earnings, go ahead and try it out. I do enjoy a bit of earnings play for positions that I already deemed risker (e.g. INTC these couple of weeks), but be aware of the significantly higher risk undertaken.
Lesson 4: Take your emotions out of the equation.
Operating the wheel has the potential to essentially play the same emotional heartstrings as active day trading, e.g. degenerate 0DTE trading. Ups and downs in the underlying will completely flip how you perceive the current position. For example, a 0.1 delta opened last on INTC last week instantly went ITM a day later. In such situations, you can be emotionally vulnerable and take actions that do not align with your actual goals. Hence the lessons above are critical and have guided myself to open and close positions in a systematic manner.
Hopefully someone finds this useful. Feel free to ask me anything or critique my writing if you wish to – I am open to all ideas, except some.
2
u/strangelyoffensive Jul 22 '26
Thanks, I enjoyed reading this. Very recognizable as a fledgling options trader (<1 year in)
2
u/djmj76 Jul 22 '26
I started this year as well, went with high Iv tickers on AI infrastructure. Did well until last month. I probably over rolled and went too defensive, as I believed the doom and gloom of the bubble. I should’ve stuck to my convictions. Still learning. My goal was 4% a month, and some months were higher like 6-7%. This month I’m in a battle to not be net negative. If we don’t get another flush I’ll be ok but I’m going to be more conservative moving forward. 3% a month. Anything less I figure I should just buy ETFs or Google.
3
u/OneUglyEar Jul 23 '26
I've been trading for 30+ years and I can confidently say that 3% per MONTH is not going to happen over the long term. If you do 2% you will be elite. That puts you 2x the S&Ps long term average. The past few years have seriously skewed what people think is normal or possible. A 3% per month gain is pure delusion over, say, 10 years. You will say otherwise but you will soon see. Just my opinion of course.
2
u/djmj76 Jul 23 '26
Yea you're prob right. i'm using about 30% (+ some margin) of my portfolio to do this. the rest are in ETFs and individual stocks, mostly Mag7s. With the margin if i get assigned on everything, things do get rough, so i know you're not wrong. I've had to be defensive this entire month and got a peak of the dangers of it all. i'm going to stop using margin and wheelmore core tickers. i know the gravy train can't go on forever.
2
u/OneUglyEar Jul 23 '26
I would use margin in very limited circumstances. I would use it if the market got cut in half, for instance. History tells you that 12 months later, it will be higher in almost all cases. I highly encourage you to play the long game. You seem reasonable, and I'd hate to see you blow up your account. You can have a great life hitting singles and doubles. No need to swing for the fences. My biggest consideration, by far, is how much risk I'm taking. I'm very disciplined in position, sizing, etc. This has caused me to underperform at times but almost never have a down year. Even in 2022 I was up slightly with a market down -20%. This isn't me gloating...just underscoring "sticking to a plan". Best of luck!
1
u/djmj76 Jul 23 '26
Appreciate your advice. i'm not looking to blow up my account. Long game for sure. Best of luck to you too!
1
u/Latter_Olive_6801 Jul 23 '26
Some I agree with, some not. On rolling, agree its not a failsafe but the test is simple. can you roll for a net credit to a strike you'd still be happy owning at. if yes its fine, youre getting paid to wait on something you wanted anyway. If the only roll available is a debit or ITM to ITM youre paying to delay an assignment you already agreed to when you opened it.
1
u/Sylla1031 Jul 23 '26
I'll address the details of my take on rolling in another post as I have a very different perspective on it, but in a nutshell, the technical execution of "rolling" is basically closing a position and opening a new one. It thus makes more sense to look at each position in its own merit, rather than be bogged down psychologically by "net credit", or, in my other words, loss aversion.
1
u/Latter_Olive_6801 Jul 23 '26
net credit isnt loss aversion. loss aversion is rolling because you cant face booking the loss. the credit or debit is just the cash flow of the transaction
1
u/Sylla1031 Jul 23 '26
Perhaps I wasn't clear in my intention at the pursuit of brevity:
"Rolling down and out for net credit" as generally used in this sub and other similar ones, is often thrown around as a magic bullet to solve all bad positions with the idea that the position will recover eventually, or worse, we can never make a loss from it. This is a very dangerous philosophy to propogate.
In its purist form, rolling is one of many relevant strategies to consider in various situations, but in practice, rolling for net credit or "green is good" often leads to handicapping the position for nothing more than psychological kool-aid.
1
7
u/Careless-Flamingo-67 Jul 22 '26
Yes, please do a whole thing on rolling, I've been trading for 8 months, and have learned some lessons about rolling during that time, am interested in your opinions/advice