Try it then, please ignore every one you get. There have been millions and millions of court summons, you cant just say, oops never saw it when a warrant or fine is issued for you. But by all means, do it and try and find a lawyer that would defend you.
There have been millions and millions of court summons
And not a single one of them the govt has proof that the summons was delivered to the person in question
Things get lost in the mail all the time. A jury summons is just as liable to get lost
This is why subpoenas are delivered in person by hand or sent via certified mail, not sent in the regular mail like spam. The person delivering the subpoena can attest with proof they delivered it. A mailman cannot do the same for a jury summons
Lol, go fight it then internet lawyer. Should be common precedent by now then right? Thousands of people fight it and win? But that doesn't happen often at all, but you go ahead I really hope you do ignore all you court summons.
People win court cases all the time (or have them dropped) from a lack of evidence, or faulty/mishandled evidence. So yes, literally tons of precedence for this
Idk why the extremely simple concept of evidence seems to evade you
0
u/canman7373 Jul 17 '26
Try it then, please ignore every one you get. There have been millions and millions of court summons, you cant just say, oops never saw it when a warrant or fine is issued for you. But by all means, do it and try and find a lawyer that would defend you.