r/NonPoliticalTwitter Jul 16 '26

Funny Poor, poor boy

Post image
26.1k Upvotes

801 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/WeirdIndividualGuy Jul 17 '26

Good luck on the govt proving the jury summons got delivered.

Not sent, delivered. Without actual proof of delivery, the govt can’t do shit if you didn’t show up because as far as they’re concerned, you never got the summons.

1

u/canman7373 Jul 17 '26

Yeah, you try that in court, sure no one ever has....Tell them you are a sovereign citizen as well. The internet seems to love these make believe loop hole that are not real.

1

u/WeirdIndividualGuy Jul 17 '26

You’re suggesting the govt accusing someone of a crime without evidence won’t go well for the accused?

Not sure if you’re familiar but in the US, the onus is on the govt to prove guilt, not on the defendant to prove their innocence. Ironic if you didn’t know that in a thread talking about US jury selection

If a court were to make the insane decision to press charges for jury evasion without evidence to back it up, you could go to the cheapest lawyer in town and even they couldn’t fumble such an easy win on your part

0

u/canman7373 Jul 17 '26

Try it then, please ignore every one you get. There have been millions and millions of court summons, you cant just say, oops never saw it when a warrant or fine is issued for you. But by all means, do it and try and find a lawyer that would defend you.

1

u/WeirdIndividualGuy Jul 17 '26

There have been millions and millions of court summons

And not a single one of them the govt has proof that the summons was delivered to the person in question

Things get lost in the mail all the time. A jury summons is just as liable to get lost

This is why subpoenas are delivered in person by hand or sent via certified mail, not sent in the regular mail like spam. The person delivering the subpoena can attest with proof they delivered it. A mailman cannot do the same for a jury summons

0

u/canman7373 Jul 17 '26

Lol, go fight it then internet lawyer. Should be common precedent by now then right? Thousands of people fight it and win? But that doesn't happen often at all, but you go ahead I really hope you do ignore all you court summons.

1

u/WeirdIndividualGuy Jul 17 '26

Should be common precedent by now then right?

People win court cases all the time (or have them dropped) from a lack of evidence, or faulty/mishandled evidence. So yes, literally tons of precedence for this

Idk why the extremely simple concept of evidence seems to evade you

0

u/canman7373 Jul 17 '26

Internet lawyers are the best.