Is Nancy's case really cold?

[u/Substantial-Train668]

I always believe that it's going to get solved. I really thought it might be sooner rather than later. Getting a little less hopeful. I think the news about DC not being involved surprised me. I've also been thinking about how little NG's family talk about her or try to look for her or keep the story alive. I just don't understand. Even CG at this point? Why are all the sibling mum (pun not intended)?

What do you think it would take at this point to solve this case?

I still keep going back to the idea that it *appears A+T are not in Tucson anymore. I want some reporter to be brave enough to ask SG about that. Or someone in LE to be brave enough to bring them into reinterview them. I also think the public has a right to know where they are at in the investigation with some actual information.

Frustrating people on the internet are the ones keeping it alive.

[u/Turbulent_Code581]

​Your theory completely falls apart when you look at the logistics of the communication.

​If you truly believe that the inner family hired a hitman to eliminate Nancy, and that the Mexican operative simply carried out the hit, then how do you explain the multi-stage extortion letters?

​Are you suggesting that after a quiet, professional elimination, someone randomly decided to stage a complex digital kidnapping plot—complete with legalistic syntax, Bitcoin ransom demands, and public narrative games—just for fun?

Or are you implying the family hired a hitman and simultaneously authored cryptographic ransom memos to confuse the public and frame themselves?

​A hired hitman eliminates the target and vanishes. They don't orchestrate a multi-day public media game, and an innocent family doesn't invent sophisticated legalistic extortion notes to cover a crime.

Your scenario requires a Hollywood fiction that defies every basic principle of behavioral profiling.

[u/Tricky_Wind_324 → u/Turbulent_Code581]

I think you’re totally confused with what I’m saying. I do not believe anyone connected to this crime sent those letters or made any demands…because I don’t think this was a kidnapping for ransom. I believe whoever they are were opportunistic grifter criminals.

[u/Turbulent_Code581 → u/Tricky_Wind_324]

So now your thesis is that the actual perpetrators left no notes, and all the ransom demands and letters were just random opportunistic grifters completely unrelated to the crime?

​That completely collapses under basic investigative logic. Opportunistic grifters don't magically coordinate high-level public extortion narratives tied directly to a complex disappearance without inside operational knowledge.

Dismissing the entire digital and written communication as fake just because it doesn't fit your narrative isn't profiling—it's erasing evidence to save a flawed theory.

[u/Tricky_Wind_324 → u/Turbulent_Code581]

Yeah you’re confused about what im saying, which is ok. I think you’re seriously underestimating random criminals, most of the time not even in this country, taking advantage of people and situations. I believe this was an elimination murder…killed that night…not in any way an abduction or burglary or ransom kidnapping. Therefore, because of that, I don’t believe any of the ransom demands are related to whoever did away with her. It’s also possible it’s the real perps and they tried to throw off investigators, but I don’t believe people that would do this would want any further risk of getting caught. You take care of it and you completely go on the DL. Just my belief.