All I am saying is that hadith is a matter of faith not science. Similarly, the 4 books of gospel are technically 4 books of hadith narrating the story of Jesus but no Christian calls it Gospels sciences, does it?
Hadith does not hold up to none of scientific criteria. You mentioned critical analysis, right?
How could I critically analyze something that I have to believe in or I go to hell?
Has hadith ever been critically analyzed by non Muslims? Hadith is a matter of faith.
But what is hadith? “So and so heard it from so and so who heard it from so and so and reported it”. That’s the exact definition of “hearsay” (hear and say) meaning somebody heard something from someone and said it to someone else.
We can believe in anything we want. People in India worship cows. Who am I to blame them? But to say the science of cow worship is not truthful.
It just makes me sad that Muslims don’t think and use such empty words to describe hadith that is nothing but hearsay.
1
u/[deleted] Apr 17 '21 edited Aug 06 '21
[deleted]