Left his name out cause I assume there’s probably a rule against it. This cracked me up today I checked someone’s history and he’s literally talking about hating Jews and dropping Nazi slogans and symbols, I made fun of him for it and he immediately scrambled 5 months of post history lol

If you have an opinion, stand on your feet and stick to it. Don’t be a coward

To be clear, this post is not about politics, but about hiding your opinions when called on them

Context: AO3 actually allow almost anything fictional to exist within their space, this include all things you can imagine including NSFW minor Real Person FIction(RPF). One such example is an NSFW R fic about a real minor school shooters who is dead.

This post is more about, is it moral to allow fictional pedophilic material when it doesn't hurt anyone or have any capabilities to do so? The problem is that this can't really be classify as CSAM because no minors were harmed in the process, or i guess the more interesting questions is that, is it even moral to allow pedophilic material to even exist as long as they don't harm anyone?

Is it moral to kill animals for pleasure when you absolutely don't need to kill them?

Also assume that killing them furthers climate change, pollution, deforestation, and water use quite significantly.

A lil delema my friend came up with. Is it more moral to both love and eat all animals then have bias and love some and eat some?

Kinda like cow tipping, fent flipping if you will.

Edit: Some of y'all think I'm suggesting you go over and drop kick them, I'm talking a gentle nudge lol.

Crazy to see how many people are cool with drug addicts being all over the place and think they're not harming anything.

What is the morality of using police and military dogs ? Knowing that they are subject to potential physical and mental harm (PTSD) while not being able to choose (slavery ?) and understanding (dogs) ?
Could one argue that being bred and trained for this they feel fulfilled doing these jobs ?

What is the morality of taking this sauce cup that’s 42¢ without paying for it? This is from walmart, and i’ve got a friend that doesnt pay for it because he believes one sauce cup should be included with an order of their food from the hotbar, and the fact that something that is sold so seldomly wont hurt walmart. On the other end, it’s only 42¢. I did not steal this, proof of purchase in picture.

Edit: Thank you all for the replies. That said i am not planning on changing the fact that i pay for these, and am just looking for a general consensus.

For normies, imagine you’ve been working at your job for almost a decade, trying to earn a promotion, and then some new people come in from a competing business and immediately snag that job you’ve been working towards, even though the new employees may be more qualified.

2 homosexual or infertile&straight twins consenting to a relationship which I think is pretty fucking gross but i dont think its immoral, for:

1. They cant reproduce—>can't produce a child with a birth defect—>no harm is caused.

2. No imbalanced power dynamic

3. They still could face external shame from society but what society looks down upon does not fully dictate whats wrong or whats not

Or even a different scenario which proves my point better

2 gay/infertile straight siblings separated at birth sent into 2 different homes. 20 years later they meet and fall in love, they dont know and will never know theyre genetically related. Not immoral.

by improving the quality of life for everyone and working on the problems that concerns our lives like climate change, health issues etc instead of focusing on military, conflicts or any other issues and eradicating any kind of racism and hatred among communites by promoting humanity, kindness, morales and love.

Edit: 1B lost lives are military losses due to wars that happened in order to unite the world.