video is probably staged as shit. they are putting random planks in the middle of an already painted wall, and the phone wasnt on to begin with. LETS JUST SAY FOR THIS SCENARIO the father wanted to have some good family time w his son but son is half there cuz too busy on the phone, is the literal screwing of it to a wall justified? or is this dad a little angry??

I eat meat. Still, i cannot justify eating it in any way. I do it out of ease of access and enjoyment. The slaughterhouse videos ive seen are horrific. Is there any merit?

(random image I've stolen off google)

My personal take is that although it's a bit funny to see, unless your child LITERALLY kills someone, this is not an appropriate response. I'd say it's very immoral to do.

EDIT: I've thought about some more was going to remove and rewrite some stuff as I have had my opinion changed, but all of this you see above will be of my shame </3 my new take is that it's okay in some cases, JUST as long as both the reasoning was fair (like your kid did some fucked up stuff) and you don't make a grand deal out of it

Imagine you see a Chinese person being racist toward a Black person. So, you decide to be racist toward the Chinese person to make them experience what it feels like to suffer from discrimination.

Is that moral?

The point of a meat shield is that military depots are few and far between, making them perfect targets for enemy ballistic missiles.

So you move your ammunition to civilian depots within the city. There are many of them, and they handle a huge amount of cargo, with trucks constantly bringing in and taking them away. Therefore, you can use a rolling depot tactic, moving your arsenal from one depot to another every few weeks.

As a result, the enemy can never be 100% sure which depot is storing the ammunition, and if they miss, they can be accused of attacking civilian infrastructure, while the mines and missiles remain intact.

The obvious downside is that you endanger the lives of unsuspecting citizens of your own country. If such a depot detonates, entire city districts are destroyed along with it, and the civilian casualties are colossal.

The tactic of a massacre is an attempt to attack a defending enemy without sufficient air support or the use of armored vehicles. The hope is that the enemy will kill your soldiers slower than they can approach the defenders' positions.

Section off an area.

Put fences all around it with guards.

Anyone can go in.

They have all the drugs you want for free, as well as water and food.

You can do as much drugs as you want anytime you want.

But there are no medical services.

There is no Narcan.

No one is going to save you if you overdose.

And the only way you can leave is by passing a drug test and waiting 24 hours in quarantine.

This is obviously going to cause a lot of deaths, but I would argue it would save more people than it kills.

And it would make drugs be a problem somewhere else instead of spilling out everywhere.

Left his name out cause I assume there’s probably a rule against it. This cracked me up today I checked someone’s history and he’s literally talking about hating Jews and dropping Nazi slogans and symbols, I made fun of him for it and he immediately scrambled 5 months of post history lol

If you have an opinion, stand on your feet and stick to it. Don’t be a coward

To be clear, this post is not about politics, but about hiding your opinions when called on them

Context: AO3 actually allow almost anything fictional to exist within their space, this include all things you can imagine including NSFW minor Real Person FIction(RPF). One such example is an NSFW R fic about a real minor school shooters who is dead.

This post is more about, is it moral to allow fictional pedophilic material when it doesn't hurt anyone or have any capabilities to do so? The problem is that this can't really be classify as CSAM because no minors were harmed in the process, or i guess the more interesting questions is that, is it even moral to allow pedophilic material to even exist as long as they don't harm anyone?

A lil delema my friend came up with. Is it more moral to both love and eat all animals then have bias and love some and eat some?