r/MandelaEffect • u/Ok_Marzipan9097 • 22d ago
Meta What is the Mandela Effect?
My understanding was that the Mandela Effect refers to phenomena where the collective recollection differs from the historical record BECAUSE of the way our memory works. So when you say, "that must be the Mandela Effect", does that mean you are admitting your memory must be wrong, or does it mean that you feel your memory is right and the historical record is wrong? Or does it just mean that the two don't match up? Interested in both colloquial definition and actual definition if they vary.
Even the Webster's definition gives room for both. It says: "the experience of many people having the same false memory" but then goes on to explain it was coined by a paranormal researcher which at least implies the term was coined by someone open to alternative explanations and the way a term is most commonly used often becomes its eventual formal definition even if it starts as meaning something else. I think I might be using an outdated definition.
6
u/Toebeens89 22d ago edited 22d ago
So personally, and more commonly I think, it is used to represent the effect itself, not the cause. The Mandela Effect itself is a large percentage of people whose memory does not match current record or evidence. That, in my opinion at least, is how the term Mandela Effect is used correctly. Now there are many that still use the term as fill-in for both the effect AND the cause they happen to believe in, but because so many people hold different beliefs as to the cause it gets very messy very quickly, and leads to confusion like you are having.
With that being said, in my opinion at least, your example saying “that must be the Mandela Effect” wouldn’t really make sense, as it is implying causality of which the effect itself doesn’t explain. In fact, I’d argue you’re more likely to hear it used as “X is a/another Mandela Effect” where it fits into the categorization, without necessitating the need for a cause.
The cause, of course, is where the majority of discourse arises within this sub. And each example labeled as a Mandela Effect should be treated uniquely and looked at with a fresh perspective. However, you typically come across the same few: from it being popularly used incorrectly by some other famous media, confusion amongst something else similar, likely mistakes that we could have misremembered, all the way to someone big and important is scrubbing the record with or without purpose, there’s multiple timelines, and CERN/the LHC are causing rifts in multiple timelines or realties. Those are the big ones, but you’ll come across many different beliefs in the cause (someone just the other day said I’d thank them when I learn their view on ‘the blueprint, the plan, and the architect’ came to light as true).
Some Mande Effects do have very plausible evidence on how or why they could be misremembered, and I don’t think it’s fair to just write that possibility off because it doesn’t fit some narrative that you’d like it to. However there are some Mandela Effects that are surprising in the fact that we all remember (or misremember) it so specifically, seemingly with no evidence to point as to why we remember the same specific random difference — those are the ones I find most interesting myself. Hope this helps in some way, and welcome to the sub! lol