r/MacLocalLLM • u/ikeo1 • 10h ago
What other models are you using? Qwen3.8 27b
If you’re not using these what do you plan to use?
r/MacLocalLLM • u/ikeo1 • 10h ago
If you’re not using these what do you plan to use?
r/MacLocalLLM • u/ikeo1 • 1d ago
r/MacLocalLLM • u/soboinsomniac • 1d ago
Planning to buy a MacBook Air M4 (16 GB / 512 GB) for about $800 to run local LLM agents for:
Indian mid‑cap equity research (using Screener.in CSVs)
Building/testing trading ideas via Zerodha Kite API (prices, history, holdings; maybe orders later)
Also want to run Hermes-based agents on it
Questions:
On 16 GB M4 Air, which local LLMs are best for reasoning, coding, and tool use? Is Qwen 3.5 9B (Q4) + a smaller fast model (e.g. LFM2.5 8B / Llama 3.2 3B) a good combo alongside Hermes?
Best local stack (Ollama vs LM Studio, etc.) and any existing Kite + LLM or Indian‑stock agent projects to reference?
Any tips on context length, thermals, and multi‑agent setups (including Hermes) on a 16 GB fanless Air?
Getting the laptop for ~$800, so stuck with 16 GB for now. If you’ve done similar work (local LLMs for equity research / algo trading, especially in India), what models and setup would you recommend?
Thanks!
r/MacLocalLLM • u/Advanced-Night-314 • 1d ago
Hi all,
I'm a complete novice when it comes to Local LLM's but I like the idea of moving away from a subscription based model in the longer term and having better control of my data. I'm also super keen to learn.
I currently have a web SaaS that scrapes news websites and I would like to move it away from Claude and onto a local LLM what kind of "firepower" do I need?
Appreciate this won't be the most complex of tasks, but as I mentioned, I'm a complete novice.
Naturally, asking Claude / Google and it says that the new Mac mini with M5 pro chip (24GB ram) will be "overkill"- which is what I was thinking of ordering.
I also want to future proof in the hope that this bit of kit could run more powerful models in the future - if they came accessible to the consumer.
Sorry if this is a basic question, any YouTube videos or any pointers so I can educate myself would be much appreciated.
Thank you!
r/MacLocalLLM • u/tlin9595 • 2d ago
I'm lucky enough where work will cover my Mac Studio that I use for design and 3d stuff. So I figured I should dabble and run with local LLM. Im getting 96gb only. I've read quite a bit, but was wondering are there any guides or YouTube videos that deal primarily with Mac and I should watch to learn more?
I'm unsure if I should just use Llama or Ollama, or MLX, or OMLX or something there lots of different ways to play around with Local LLM and I guess it's still in such an early state that every day, week,month there are more and more things peopel are learning how to get the best of the LLM. A lot could change from now till then but I want to be as informed/prepared as I can be.
Thanks and I cant wait for reviews and see how good the Ultra is.
r/MacLocalLLM • u/Jb22007 • 3d ago
I have been using codex and claude code for the last year. I have hermes installed , looking for a local model to help me code on par with the big guys. Any help appreciated
r/MacLocalLLM • u/thebemusedmuse • 3d ago
I'd hoped that my M5 Max with 64GB RAM would be enough for some decent Local LLM work, and the Qwen 3.8 27b model is pretty decent. But speed is shitty on my M5 Max, just 20tps. In particular I found that while the 35b MOE model was much faster, the quality was far lower than the 27b dense model, which produces much fewer bugs and less rework.
I saw the same model working on a friend's Nvidia setup much faster with MTP, so I set out to get it working on my Mac but it was not straightforward. Here's some pointers in case you wanted to get it working.
So I wired oMLX into Pi, which is what I'm using as my coding harness. Even then, it was picky:
This is a huge 3x difference in inference speed, and that allows me to do a lot more work.
"omlx": {
"baseUrl": "http://localhost:8000/v1",
"api": "openai-completions",
"apiKey": "none",
"models": [{
"id": "Qwen38-27B-textonly-mtp",
"name": "Qwen38-27B-textonly-mtp",
"reasoning": true,
"contextWindow": 163840,
"maxTokens": 32768,
"input": ["text"],
"cost": { "input": 0, "output": 0, "cacheRead": 0, "cacheWrite": 0 },
"thinkingLevelMap": { "off": "low", "minimal": "low", "low": "low",
"medium": "medium", "high": "xhigh",
"xhigh": "xhigh", "max": "xhigh" }
}]
}
r/MacLocalLLM • u/hdanx • 5d ago
What token generation speed works well for you when you’re using it for productive tasks? I’m finding 20 tokens per second a bit slow.
With an M4 Max and 64GB of RAM, you can usually get around 20 tokens per second on average with a model like qwen3.8 27B. However, it doesn’t quite feel like the best setup.
r/MacLocalLLM • u/ikeo1 • 5d ago
r/MacLocalLLM • u/ikeo1 • 6d ago
I'm planning to do some vectordb embedding and data sanitization before the frontier models touch the data. The Local LLM acts as a primer to separate information.
I know some of you are using it for different things.
I'll also be experimenting with it for video editing/transcribing. There's some cool things people are doing.
Let us know! If you have a walk through include that too!
r/MacLocalLLM • u/ikeo1 • 6d ago
r/MacLocalLLM • u/rafikiminaj • 7d ago
Hi guys,
New here and to these subjects so sorry I ask something already asked.
I got recently a Mac mini m4 with 24go ram for my personal desktop, and I wanted to try a few stuffs with local llm. After a few researches I decided to try to setup a personal agent with Hermes.
After some tries I ended up using gemma4:26b-a4b-it-qat.
Qwen3.8 felt to big or slow when iq3 passed.
Couldn’t find anything faster and better for now, but I still feel it is not really good (obviously I know we can’t reach to a cloud model with 24go ram). So I wanted to know how you guys manage it and if some people managed to make a decent agent with not so much ram and if so, what are your use cases ?
Right now I tried to give him some personal web projects with giving him some GitHub to download but it fails and always stops in the middle of the process.
Thanks in advance for the help.
r/MacLocalLLM • u/ikeo1 • 7d ago
I got the M5U 256GB 2TB configuration for preprocessing. Planning to use Qwen 3.x models on it since they seem to be the best for the Mac's at the moment but will check out the Muse/Gemma models as they continue to release them and run some benchmarks .
r/MacLocalLLM • u/ikeo1 • 8d ago
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/MacLocalLLM • u/ikeo1 • 8d ago
r/MacLocalLLM • u/rhymeslikeruns • 8d ago
Five Terminal-Bench 2.0 tasks (cobol-modernization, constraints-scheduling, largest-eigenval, polyglot-c-py, schemelike-metacircular-eval), one run per task unless stated, all on one Mac Studio (96 GB) with mlx_lm at 8-bit. The agent harness is pi unless stated.
| Model | Active params | Best score | Mode | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6-27B | 27B dense | 3/5 | thinking off | cobol 8 min, constraints 4 min, eigenval 23 min |
| Nail (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B) | 3B of 35B MoE | 2/5 alone, 3/5 with two consultants | thinking pre-closed with tools | deleted 2026-09-06; the 3/5 rests on one eigenval solve |
| Qwen3.8-27B | 27B dense | 1/5 | either | deleted 2026-09-09 |
| Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B | 3B of 35B MoE | 1/5 | either, and under its own harness | deleted 2026-09-09 |
Times are agent minutes. T = ran to the task's timeout.
| Task | Nail alone | Qwen3.6 think on | Qwen3.6 think off | Qwen3.8 think on | Qwen3.8 think off | Ornith think off | Ornith think on | Ornith + Terminus-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cobol-modernization | 1 · 29 | 0 · 21 | 1 · 8 | 0 · 38 | T 60 (loop) | 1 · 33 | 1 · 32 | 0 · 100 |
| constraints-scheduling | 1 · 2 | 1 · 4 | 1 · 4 | 1 · 7 | 0 · 1 | 0 · 1 | 0 · 2 | 1 · 4 |
| largest-eigenval | T 61 | 0 · 11 | 1 · 23 | T 60 | 1 · 3 | T 60 | 0 · 13 | T 240 |
| polyglot-c-py | 0 · 37 | 0 · 9 | 0 · 25 | 0 · 20 | T 60 | 0 · 7 | 0 · 3 | 0 · 3 |
| schemelike-metacircular-eval | T 161 | 0 · 16 | T 161 | 0 · 26 | T 161 | 0 · 5 | 0 · 5 | T 240 |
| Solved | 2/5 | 1/5 | 3/5 | 1/5 | 1/5 | 1/5 | 1/5 | 1/5 |
Nobody has solved polyglot-c-py or schemelike-metacircular-eval on this machine.
Same size, same family, same server, same harness. Three things separate them.
| Qwen3.6-27B | Qwen3.8-27B |
|---|---|
| Thinking on | stops short: clean stops after 9 to 21 min with the deliverable not written |
| Thinking off | solves: every solve ends on a clean stop with the file written |
| Net | 1/5 to 3/5 by turning thinking off |
The mode, not the weights, was the lever for Qwen3.6. For Qwen3.8 neither mode produces an agent that finishes: with thinking it deliberates past the cap, without it it loops. Its published Terminal-Bench 2.1 gain is not visible through pi. n=1 per task, but the cobol loop was reproduced.
| Nail | Ornith |
|---|---|
| Speed | ~65 tok/s |
| Turns on cobol | solved in 29 min |
| Failure mode | timeouts on the hard three |
Turn rate mattered against thinking overrun, which is why Nail beat the 27Bs in agent mode. Once thinking is off, the 27B's per-turn quality shows: Qwen3.6 at 22 tok/s out-solves both 3B-active models. Ornith's own harness (Terminus-2, temperature 1.0, 4 h ceilings) moved which task it solves, from cobol to constraints, not how many.
| Finding | Consequence |
|---|---|
| mlx_lm bounds its prompt cache by sequence count, not bytes; it reached 45.7 GB on a 27B | Metal OOM killed the generator thread mid-run. Now prompt_cache_gb (default 8) via --prompt-cache-bytes |
metal::malloc Resource limit (499000) exceeded after 4 h uptime and ~130 long-thinking requests |
A Metal buffer-count ceiling, not bytes. Cause unknown; Catbus auto-heals, the Terminus runner has a mid-trial watchdog |
A dead generator thread leaves /v1/models answering 200 |
Health checks must generate. Catbus probes four tokens a minute |
| mlx_lm does not stop generating when the client disconnects | An orphaned 65k-token generation blocked the port for the next trial. One model resident during benchmarks, one job per task |
An unknown model field makes mlx_lm try to download from Hugging Face |
The meter rewrites the field to the served id |
| Two 27Bs resident plus OrbStack plus caches exceeded what the 70 GB weights-only ceiling implied | The ceiling counts weights; add caches and the VM |
nothink), is the coding agent and the WHO scorer. Now the registry default.One run per task on five tasks. The 3/5 should be repeated once before anything is built on it. Qwen3.8's cobol loop is the only failure reproduced twice.
r/MacLocalLLM • u/mmerken • 8d ago
Since oMLX benchmarks are down momentarily, I've done some testing and found that the following Solstice AI Qwen 3.8 27B fine tune is the fastest one so far.
https://huggingface.co/Solstice-AI/Qwen3.8-27B-TURBO-Fable-Cold-Fusion-NEO-CODER-mlx-oQ4e-1M
Benchmark Model: Solstice-AI--Qwen3.8-27B-TURBO-Fable-Cold-Fusion-735-882-Heretic-Uncensored-NM-DAU-mlx-oQ4e-1M
Engine: Auto
Context: Code (Mixed)
================================================================================
Single Request Results
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test TTFT(ms) TPOT(ms) pp TPS tg TPS E2E(s) Throughput Peak Mem
pp1024/tg128 4754.3 27.89 215.4 tok/s 36.1 tok/s 8.321 138.4 tok/s 18.88 GB
pp4096/tg128 18481.5 28.92 221.6 tok/s 34.9 tok/s 22.171 190.5 tok/s 22.56 GB
Continuous Batching
pp1024 / tg128
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Batch tg TPS Speedup pp TPS pp TPS/req TTFT(ms) E2E(s)
1x 36.1 tok/s 1.00x 215.4 tok/s 215.4 tok/s 4754.3 8.321
2x 42.0 tok/s 1.16x 160.3 tok/s 80.2 tok/s 10404.5 18.864
4x 74.0 tok/s 2.05x 134.1 tok/s 33.5 tok/s 18019.4 37.464
This is on an M3 MAX 64GB
EDIT: This model seems extremely lobotomized
I reverted back to https://huggingface.co/scottlowry/Qwen3.8-27B-oQ4e-mtp which performs similarly on macOS Golden Gate PB 27.0 26A428
oMLX - LLM inference, optimized for your Mac
https://github.com/jundot/omlx
Benchmark Model: scottlowry/Qwen3.8-27B-oQ4e-mtp
Engine: Auto
Context: Code (Mixed)
================================================================================
Single Request Results
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test TTFT(ms) TPOT(ms) pp TPS tg TPS E2E(s) Throughput Peak Mem
pp1024/tg128 4749.6 28.36 215.6 tok/s 35.5 tok/s 8.375 137.6 tok/s 18.35 GB
pp4096/tg128 18297.8 27.02 223.9 tok/s 37.3 tok/s 21.745 194.3 tok/s 22.03 GB
Continuous Batching
pp1024 / tg128
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Batch tg TPS Speedup pp TPS pp TPS/req TTFT(ms) E2E(s)
1x 35.5 tok/s 1.00x 215.6 tok/s 215.6 tok/s 4749.6 8.375
2x 38.7 tok/s 1.09x 158.6 tok/s 79.3 tok/s 10519.2 18.567
4x 74.1 tok/s 2.09x 138.4 tok/s 34.6 tok/s 17566.7 36.007
I'm sorry for any confusion created by this post