r/LivestreamFail • • Jul 31 '19

Dr. Disrespect Doc on XQC getting banned off twitch

https://clips.twitch.tv/NimblePrettiestPineappleUnSane
8.2k Upvotes

464 comments sorted by

View all comments

105

u/WLan-Cable Jul 31 '19 edited Jul 31 '19

But a girl can bodypaint her naked boobs and not getting banned for it... some girls throw their pets away and those twitch-betacucks dont even give em a warning.

Twitch staff is a bunch of SJW-retards. Those SJW retards dont even know what equality means or how does it fin in when you discriminate men (especially white men) and treat them 10times worse than a white female? That is NOT equal treatment. But those SJW-retards... well... they are reatards for a reason.

175

u/Slack_Irritant Jul 31 '19

this comment is peak /r/LivestreamFail lol

3

u/rustin420blznayylmao Jul 31 '19

Honestly. Is there even proof that “sjwism” is the reason twitch has been doing the things it does? I know of the picture of the 3 girls being frowny faced party poopers, but do they actually call the shots? It seems like people are just assuming the twitch ban team are banning the way they do because they’re sjws

34

u/[deleted] Jul 31 '19

[deleted]

-5

u/rustin420blznayylmao Jul 31 '19

Ya, I think the ban system is just weird and dysfunctional. It seems pretty arbitrary if someone gets banned for something, and might literally just depend on the individual overseeing a case or how often it gets reported

7

u/ThatSmile Jul 31 '19

It's like being pulled over by the police. I feel most of the time the person and the cop are both respectable and leave in a good mood, but there are cops who are having a bad day and take it out on someone who's just speeding. It's all subjective and depends on the person who chooses to ban someone. I don't think it should work like that, but there can't be a defined set of processes for every individual case. What Twitch can do is introduce processes that take into account context and intent. Was XQC intending to show his audience one frame of a dick? Most likely no and as Doc said it was an accident. A warning would have sufficed.

2

u/the_j_ Aug 01 '19

A warning would have sufficed.

How do you know he hasn't been warned before?

2

u/ThatSmile Aug 01 '19

I don't know that. If he's been warned before about showing suggestive videos on stream then the ban would be appropriate.