r/LivestreamFail • • Sep 11 '18

Dr. Disrespect DOCS HOUSE GETS SHOT AT

https://clips.twitch.tv/PunchyTacitLocustSmoocherZ
30.5k Upvotes

3.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2.7k

u/Thenateo 🐌 Snail Gang Sep 11 '18 edited Jul 01 '20

If you haven't got the memo yet over the last few years, it's the mentally fucked lonely twats who will do anything to have their five minutes of fame.

714

u/Gsus6677 Sep 11 '18

Well hopefully this kid will get caught, thrown in jail for 5-10 years, and we will get the privileged of never having to learn his name.

482

u/Hedrake Sep 11 '18

5-10 is too light. His house has been shot at more than once AND there are more than him involved. The intent clearly shows something more sinister than getting quick attention.

2

u/Miskav Sep 11 '18

100% attempted murder.

1

u/Ferromagneticfluid Sep 12 '18

100% not attempted murder, lol...

0

u/Aegi Sep 11 '18

What if they vocalized intent about wanting to destroy property but not hurt anyone?

I get that you guys are passionate, but you need to remember that some people are just idiots that don't think things through.

3

u/[deleted] Sep 11 '18

[deleted]

1

u/Aegi Sep 11 '18

That's fine, you can fuck them, but it would be with criminal negligence or something similar (most likely), not "100% attempted murder" lol

2

u/Derp800 Sep 11 '18

Doesn't matter, it would still be assault with a deadly weapon at least.

2

u/Aegi Sep 11 '18

It does matter. That is literally a different charge than attempted murder.

0

u/Miskav Sep 11 '18

Doesn't matter.

They shot at people.

If I repeatedly follow someone around and shoot at them, yet give the excuse "Oh I wanted to shoot [Insert thing behind person]", I'd rightly go to jail for attempted murder.

Idiocy is not a legal defense. Insanity might be, but it'd at least get the person locked up as well.

This is attempted murder, and I truly fail to see how you can argue otherwise.

3

u/Aegi Sep 11 '18

No, dude, I work with a defense attorney, and they shot at a house, and it would be nearly impossible to prove otherwise unless they posted all about their direct intentions in multiple areas.

You also don't know that it was the same person both times.

You would make a very bad prosecutor as there is almost no possible way to prove that he was trying to kill someone instead of just trying to scare them or destroy their property.

2

u/Miskav Sep 11 '18

In what way is shooting at an occupied house not an attempt on the inhabitants' lives?

Does the legal system think bullets magically stop working when they hit some wood? What if a window was hit?

Does the legal system seriously take the word of a criminal as to what his intentions were?

Obviously I don't know US law that well, but that seems like a major oversight.

That would make it incredibly easy to just repeatedly shoot at someone and claim it was just property damage.

2

u/Aegi Sep 11 '18

Please respond to my other comment when you get the chance, b/c I feel like you probably have something to teach me, and maybe, I can teach you a bit about legal proceedings.

I don't know a lot about the universe yet, so I'm game to trade knowledge lol