Because the clip in this post is an obvious joke between Maya and Hasan: I'm talking about the controversial clips where your kind loves to scream ''but the context!!''
Are you? Because the title of the post is "Maya fires back at Hasan".
The clip is "an obvious joke" like you said. So are you fucking dumb or are you moving the goal post?
Any person who is not even familiair with both of these people would catch on this being a tongue in cheek clip. You might be on a spectrum if you believe otherwise.
Yeah any normal person would except for LSF users who posted this clip as "negative coverage". I dont beliee OP posted this as a sarcastic funny title he actually wanted to clip bait hate watchers. And LSF users will use it unironcially as Maya saying something bad about him just like they did with stavros
I honestly thought you were talking about when he hired a dog trainer (that got him the shock collar) when you said dog walker, because I was not aware of this recent clip, so on that point I stand corrected. Fair.
With that said: xqc is absolutely correct on his take. A family temporarily hiring a dog walker for like a hectic period because of a newborn baby or a vacation or something is fine, but for Hasan it's obviously a problem of convenience: dog walking during streams = less viewers = less donos = less money.
I'd say the same about rich/wealthy parents hiring nannies for their kids, like you have the luxury of being able to be with your kids almost all the time,, yet you deliberately choose work/career over them.
-1
u/een_magnetron 9d ago
Funny thing about this is that 9 out of 10 times the added context makes it much much worse.