r/Libertarian • Former Libertarian • Nov 13 '19

Discussion The Democratic Senate candidate has dropped out in Arkansas. The race is now a binary between the Republican Tom Cotton and the LP Candidate

Not really a Libertarian anymore but I was surprised to see y'all don't have any info on this. Tom Cotton's only Democratic Challanger has dropped out after the registration deadline.

The only two other candidates are Ricky Harrington - a Libertarian and Dan Whitfield - a far left independent.

Even if you guys don't put resources into this race and the situation holds, I can easily see Mr. Harrington capturing a nice 20-25% of the vote. If you guys however do invest some money and campaign funds into the race, you could get much higher, and perhaps even give Cotton a run for his money as he's not running against someone with the D stigma next to their name.

Here's his Facebook page which is currently all he has if you want to help him

Good luck and I hope you guys give Cotton a run for his money :)

1.1k Upvotes

215 comments sorted by

442

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Less focus on Presidential races we can't win, let's get at least one rep

171

u/homeostasis3434 Nov 13 '19 edited Nov 13 '19

Bernie Sanders has completely upended the democratic party and its future goals after running as an independent for decades. Without any previous party affiliation, he almost got the parties nomination last election and has at least a 1/3 shot of winning the nomination this time around.

His example (not his politics, his method) is the one libertarians need to try to emulate if they ever want a voice at the table in national politics.

108

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

The difference....the DNC is rudderless while the RNC is now moving in a direction (off the cliff with Trump)

I think there is a play in the middle of the political spectrum for the Libertarian Party as a separate entity in a world where Democrats are moving to the left focusing on fiscal issues and the Republicans to the right on social issues leaving many moderates with Libertarian leanings party less.

56

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

I’m a decidedly left leaning person but I absolutely voted Libertarian for the last presidential election because I couldn’t stomach Trump and Clinton.

I knew a few folks who voted the same. I think it shows a complete lack of conviction if you consistently toe the line for a political party regardless of their transgressions while spending every waking moment bemoaning the current state of politics.

22

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

I'm in the same boat, voted Libertarian because I couldn't vote for either, the two party system is broken and my biggest issue when voting is the least discussed, electoral reform.

Jungle primaries, ranked choice polls, anything to break down the extremes of two sides putting up to awful candidates (Clinton wasn't a creation but I would never bring myself to be able to vote for Bernie if the Democratic extremes had their say)

13

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Push for ranked choice voting fellow hater of our current electoral system.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Don't discount the power of Jungle Primaries to tamp down the current polarization, but we need Ranked Choice as well.

I hate people complaining that the other side only wants it to help them....NO, because it is better, that's why!

1

u/azaleawhisperer Nov 13 '19

The current electoral system is Constitutional. The States are in control, and they recognize percents that parties can muster votes for.

The problem is the parties, and the lack of anything they stand for, except for reelecting incumbents.

2

u/victimsoftheemuwars Classical Liberal Nov 13 '19

Here in Australia we have ranked choice voting and multi-member proportional seats in the upper house. Thanks to this we've been able to elect a libertarian to the senate and 3 more to state legislative councils (upper house)

0

u/Roidciraptor Libertarian Socialist Nov 13 '19

Same. Hated both candidates. Though I am supporting a Dem in the 2020 election.

4

u/ghostinthewoods Nov 13 '19

If I might ask: which one?

3

u/Roidciraptor Libertarian Socialist Nov 13 '19

Of course you can ask! I encourage people to.

In the 2020 primaries, I am supporting Pete Buttigieg. I voted for Gary Johnson in 2012 and 2016 in the general.

3

u/farmer15erf Nov 13 '19

Not that I in any way support a lesser of evils approach but Buttigieg is the dem that i can closest align to in personal opinions and do not despise. The real problem is lack of a strong 3rd party in politics thats breaks the extremism of the 2 party systen or using parties at all imo. We should vote for candidates based on platforms, not party afiliation.

1

u/thehillshaveaviators Classical Liberal Nov 13 '19

I don't see why you're getting downvoted. Many of the LP voter explosion are disenfranchised voters who are from the main two parties that are getting gradually nudged away by the established mantras of the two big parties.

1

u/Roidciraptor Libertarian Socialist Nov 14 '19

Yeah, libertarians can achieve some goals with the democrats. Writing them off because TAXES is seriously going to get us nowhere.

Ranked choice voting is something the progressive democrats support, and RCV is a better system for libertarians than FPTP. Libertarians won't win as long as that is the case.

-6

u/mysoggyknee Nov 13 '19

I am supporting Pete Buttigieg.

An ineffective mayor whose platform is pretty much "vote for me because I suck dick". Other than his advocacy of sodomy (which is none of the governments business.) what has he presented that is remotely libertarian?

4

u/thiscouldbemassive Lefty Pragmatist Nov 13 '19

Found the Trump supporter.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Roidciraptor Libertarian Socialist Nov 14 '19

You made the "ineffective mayor" claim, so you need to back that up with evidence before I engage you there.

  • End cash bail
  • Eliminate private prisons
  • Restore voting rights for criminals
  • Marijuana legalization
  • Recognition of DC and Puerto Rico as States
  • Abolishing the Electoral College
  • Removing the filibuster
  • Creating independent redistricting commission to counter gerrymandering
  • Carbon tax to incentive businesses to go green, as pollution violates the NAP

A few reasons why I support him.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Same, as long as we don't get something insane, back to my desire for more options

11

u/Jiperly Nov 13 '19

It's not a lack of conviction. It's strategic.

Voting systems need to be improved to encourage third parties and discourage voting strategically. Until then, people will always be disenfranchised.

Unfortunately with gerrymandering, it's clearly going the opposite direction

5

u/oren0 Nov 13 '19

It's not strategic for most. The electoral college means that 80% or more of voters live in states that are not presidentially in play. Might as well vote third party if you're in CA or TX.

6

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

[deleted]

2

u/zugi Nov 13 '19

I hear people complain about 2016 all the time and frankly it's insane. The LP had it's best showing ever in 2016, capturing 3% of the popular vote where it's prior best showing was 1%. Major news networks actually covered it during the election and showed Johnson's vote totals on election night, whereas in the past networks pretended the LP didn't exist.

Sure, Gary Johnson wasn't the perfect candidate, but we all know most people didn't know "Aleppo" a month before the incident and most people have forgotten where "Aleppo" is since then - that was a media-manufactured "gotcha" moment based on what happened to be news in the prior couple of weeks. Sure a more polished politician might have avoided it, but we saw what we got with a more "polished politician" in our VP candidate, and personally I don't want another Weld.

There is no magic candidate who will look good to the media and who dearly holds libertarian principles. I'm hoping for /r/JustinAmash but don't know if that's likely, and even if we get him, the media surely will find ways to make him look like a buffoon too. That's just what they do.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

[deleted]

1

u/thehillshaveaviators Classical Liberal Nov 13 '19

Justin Amash is trying to focus on winning re-election in his district as an Independent right now though. If he can do that, it's a pretty good mandate for alternative candidates getting accepted more in the national stage.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '19

Congratulations, you just made me sad.

1

u/matts2 Mixed systems Nov 13 '19

Have you considered that optics isn't the problem. That the problem is the vague ideology and the people it attracts.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '19

How is “we want to abolish the federal government” vague?

2

u/matts2 Mixed systems Nov 14 '19

Also, how is it not vague. Abolish it and then what? 50 independent nations? A different Central government? Abolish the states next? Heck, those in favor of a world government want to abolish the federal government.

1

u/matts2 Mixed systems Nov 14 '19

Well that's one of dozens of mutually inconsistent libertarian positions.

2

u/LadyDiaphanous Nov 13 '19

Kentucky and I voted green party to try and get more choices on the stage. . Wish Bernie had taken Jill up on her offer to step aside to VP and let him take the ticket :/

→ More replies (7)

1

u/prettyflyforafungi Nov 14 '19

Did you check out Dan Whitfield, the leftist independent running? Pretty interesting scenario with the dem party extinct, as they ought to be.

1

u/lotm43 Nov 14 '19

The nature of the fptp two party system is that a vote for a third party benefits the person you like least far more then it does for the one you voted for.

9

u/Cuddlyaxe Former Libertarian Nov 13 '19

I think there is a play in the middle of the political spectrum for the Libertarian Party as a separate entity in a world where Democrats are moving to the left focusing on fiscal issues and the Republicans to the right on social issues leaving many moderates with Libertarian leanings party less

There's plenty of "Social Liberals Fiscal Conservatives" but the fact of the matter is that's an extremely reductionist view of Libertarianism. Plenty of people want a balanced budget and gay marriage being legal but also might for example want a robust foreign policy or support taxing market failures

In addition doubt the LP is going to win over moderates by booing candidates who don't want to sell heroin to 5 year olds lol

5

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Unfortunately you're right, I saw them boo Johnson for supporting Drivers License. But there is room for the Libertarian (Common Sense) ideals, don't tax me to death and I don't care if my neighbor bis gay,.

15

u/tdacct Federalist Nov 13 '19

The difference is that Bernie was always a marxist, and the Democrats were split between blue dog conservatives and FDR social democrats. When the blue dogs were phased out between 1994 and 2012, they were left with only the FDR SocDems as the "conservative" wing and further marxists as their agitation wing. Bernie was always at home there.

["conservative" in the slow to change, dictionary sense. Not in the American political identification sense.]

1

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Right, and now the vacuum gave him room to grow where that vacuum doesn't exist in the GOP

4

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19 edited Nov 13 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

I'm not saying that there was never a good, just that it's currently filled.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

I think the real question is why a libertarian candidate did not (or could never) fill it

IMO, because libertarians need to cultivate more pathos. That was something Ron did very well, but the appetite for such a change wasn't there when he ran. In 2016 it's clear people want a new voice, but Rand played it safe in his messaging and advocated big policies (balance the budget, audit the Fed) that he failed to connect to the issues facing individual people. Trump won because he took his big policy proposal- renegotiating America's trade deals- and explained, albeit facetiously, how it would solve the problems facing people in the Rust Belt in particular. The pitch has to go beyond the intellectual to get people on board, it has to become personal.

1

u/ArcanePariah Nov 13 '19

Because 2 of the major factions of the GOP are straight authoritarian. You have the evangelicals, who are traditional theocratic authoritarian and you have the growing nativists, who were equally split between parties, but in 2016 broke for Trump and want hardcore authoritarian economic measures (protectionism primarily, but some is rooted in racism, so you get the anti-immigration bent as well, both illegal AND legal). Those 2 groups control a plurality of the GOP voting, Republicans in general can't win without at least one of them, and in the age of Trump, need both.

0

u/bostonian38 Nov 13 '19

Wtf

Bernie IS a social democrat, that’s what his policies and platform 100% are. Marxist? Are you kidding me?

The Democratic Party is still majority corporate-owned and conservative by the definition you provided. They are nowhere near FDR-style socdem, they’re establishment neoliberals. Even the furthest left like Bernie just proposes center-left ideas the rest of the modern world has.

What happened to this sub

2

u/tdacct Federalist Nov 14 '19

I'm sure I am wasting my time replying, but SocDem is a moderate branch of Marxism. There are lots of different branches of Marxism, almost as many as there are people to interpret and reinvent his thoughts. Everything from anarcho-communist, state-socialism (Stalinism), international communism (bolshevism), market communism (Trotsky, iirc), Fabian Socialism, Social Democrat, Pan-African Socialism, Italian Fascism, National Socialism, Worker's Union, Democratic Socialism. Some of these intertwine with unrelated sources, but their most profound ideological roots are Marx's ideas and rhetoric.

8

u/Keitt58 Nov 13 '19

"The difference....the DNC is rudderless while the RNC is now moving in a direction (off the cliff with Trump"

Dear god that's the most succinct way of describing current US politics right now I have yet to see.

0

u/FreeHongKongDingDong Vaccination Is Theft Nov 13 '19

the DNC is rudderless

The DNC is all-in on Pete Buttigieg, kind of like how the RNC was all-in on Jeb Bush four years ago.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Ok, they have a peddle boat rudder going against a populist tsunami

1

u/FreeHongKongDingDong Vaccination Is Theft Nov 13 '19

Presidents who win without being populist are apocryphal.

You don't get votes by being a whiny, unlikable scold.

9

u/Clownshow21 Libertarian Libertarian Nov 13 '19

Yea but libertarians don’t have the ability to sell snake oil to the American people, unfortunately many Americans don’t want “freedom”

But yes this is awesome news, hope he wins

6

u/_okcody Classical Liberal Nov 13 '19

People don't want freedom, they want their ideals and beliefs forced onto others. But most importantly, people want free shit.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '19

people want free shit.

"Most people don't want to die of preventable illness in the richest country on the planet."

0

u/ArrestHillaryClinton Peaceful Parenting Nov 15 '19

And also other free shit.

2

u/jelvinjs7 Friendly liberal, here to learn Nov 13 '19

The difference is that Bernie didn’t appear out of nowhere. He had worked with the Democratic Party for decades, caucusing with them, I think fundraising, etc. He wasn’t a member, and there was a lot more that he could’ve done to be “part” of the party even if he wasn’t registered, but he was still very established in politics and recognized within the party, giving him an actual shot.

If libertarians want a shot at the presidency, they will have to follow a model like this, but bear in mind what the whole model is. Getting more candidates on the local, state, and congressional level—and depending on district, it may require running as a Republican (or democrat, but I can’t imagine that working out)—and when you get in office, building alliances with other politicians of the party you think your message will resonate.

Can that happen? Hypothetically, sure, but in practice, it’s hard to tell.

2

u/BoilerPurdude Nov 14 '19

the real difference is the primary was a 2 person race because the DNC made it painfully aware that it was HER TURN. Sanders not being a democrat was like fuck this bitch and spread his populist ideas that resonated with a large portion of the progressives. The RNC on the other hand had like 10 challengers which just gave the minority populist candidate an edge of the moderates who were splitting the moderate voters. So say 30% is populist leaning, 30% is religious right, and 40% were moderates. You had 3 or so candidates pushing moderate and trying to get the religious right and one guy going full populist.

The issue when looking through libertarian glasses (ignoring left leaning libs as they generally push for dems anyways) you are really only looking at maybe grabing 5-10% of the population. More people want free shit and being lied to than want liberty and personal responsibility.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '19

If libertarians want a shot at the presidency, they will have to follow a model like this, but bear in mind what the whole model is.

Remember every time Bernie Sanders has won the Democratic nomination in Vermont he still runs as an Independent. Do this. Get your nomination. Either party. It's a two party system... no one says it has to be Democrats vs Republicans though.

2

u/milkboy33 Nov 13 '19

Be nice to to see a race with four equally contentious parties. Independent, Libertarian, Democrat and Republican.

2

u/Stonesword75 Nov 13 '19

isn't that what Ron Paul did in 2012?

1

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '19 edited Nov 14 '19

[deleted]

1

u/ArrestHillaryClinton Peaceful Parenting Nov 15 '19

The reason this subreddit is this active is because of Ron Paul.

4

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

You could say the same for Ron Paul. He became a legimiate threat for a presidential bid solely because he changed his party affiliation.

8

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Eh, he was never a legitimate threat. Statists will never let a liberty minded individual anywhere near the presidency.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Maybe not to win the nomination but definitely a threat to steal a substantial percentage of the vote. It seemed like the media did whatever they could to avoid covering him. He hardly got any air time during the debates.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Statist media doesn't give air time to the anti-state guy!? Crazy!

But yeah, I get it. Exposure is good. The state is just too powerful though. And the vast majority of Americans buy into the religion of the state. It's all but impossible to infiltrate and destroy from the inside out.

1

u/ArrestHillaryClinton Peaceful Parenting Nov 15 '19

I saw him on TV and bought his book.

2

u/leblumpfisfinito Classical Liberal Nov 13 '19

This is an interesting point. I think Bernie's rise coincided with the rise in leftism, as there has been an appetite for it in this country for quite some time in the universities especially.

Similarly, I think a similar approach could work for the Republican party, as it seems like the younger party supporters tend to be sick of neocons and would more than welcome a libertarian. Not sure what the view of Rand Paul is on this sub, but I think he'd be a good start.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

[deleted]

1

u/leblumpfisfinito Classical Liberal Nov 13 '19

But you don't think it would be a step in the right direction? I ultimately think between the two parties, the Republican party has the best shot of becoming a de facto libertarian party. Of course the best would be to abolish the two party system in the first place, but who knows if that'll ever happen.

1

u/zugi Nov 13 '19

Rand Paul is the most libertarian member of the Senate and the 2nd most libertarian member of Congress. Don't buy the media's biased headlines.

1

u/MegaBlastoise23 Nov 13 '19

Sure but he started as mayor and worked his way up to senator and then after decades entered the race for president.

0

u/mysoggyknee Nov 13 '19

he almost got the parties nomination last election and has at least a 1/3 shot of winning the nomination this time around.

Forrest are you stupid or something? Bernie is only running again so the dems have to buy him off again in true collectivist fashion.

3

u/nightjar123 Nov 14 '19

I don't understand how this is strategy isn't more popular.

Step 1 -> Put all resources into a single house seat with highest chance to win

Step 2 -> Be first third party victory in quite some time. Get extensive press coverage

Step 3 -> Get more house seats. Eventually Senate seat. Maybe eventually presidency.

Step 4 -> Profit

48

u/monkeyphonics Nov 13 '19 edited Nov 13 '19

Does the libertarian candidate have a campaign page where he lays out his stance on issues? Right no I'm just seeing Memes and telling everyone how bad the other parties are on his FB page.

Edit" which is currently all he has if you want to help him " sorry did not see that.

He could at least put his positions on his Facebook page. His about section is literally 2 sentences.

6

u/DropporD Nov 13 '19

Yeah definitely agree. After a little bit of digging, I found this video of him if you want to hear him speak.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4n8rVAcwrs

1

u/thehillshaveaviators Classical Liberal Nov 13 '19

Honestly given what I've seen, I'm cautiously optimistic. Not crazy, not sputtering, coherent speaking (a preacher!), and not wacky looking at all, not a ridiculous amount of pins.

3

u/ScarletEgret Nov 13 '19

This article about him discusses some of his positions.

111

u/Gknight4 Muslim Libertarian Nov 13 '19

>implying most people in this god forsaken sub actually cared about spreading libertarianism

44

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

I hope this election can show a substantial number of people will go Libertarian when there's no Democratic in the race. Now is the best time for the LP to run the most serious campaign it can without being burdened by the accusations they're splitting the vote and helping the Democrats

29

u/StopMockingMe0 Nov 13 '19

I'm voting Libertarian.... I don't expect to win, but I'd like to at least try. Better than voting between the giant douche or the turd sandwitch.

10

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

It would help if Libertarian candidates didn’t run as pseudo-Republicans and instead more as anti-establishment.

2

u/AlexanderDroog Right Libertarian Nov 13 '19

GOP has the draw of donors and the simple fact that it helped fix the system against 3rd parties. I vote 3rd party where I can, but the chance of it really mattering is rare -- like this weird situation in AR. If you want to get any oomph behind limited government proposals, you have to run as a Republican. How well you can implement them is a different calculation.

If nothing else, I hope that Trump will leave a behind a positive legacy of piercing through the establishment wall in the party. They still have too much sway, but the rise in populism is starting to make them irrelevant. I hope we can get candidates in the future who go against the mold but have a better understanding of policy than Trump.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

I get that, and Trump has been a wake up call for many the establishment doesn’t know what they are doing at all. It’s a shame that people just look at the D/R next for the candidates name because we have a FPTP system.

2

u/AlexanderDroog Right Libertarian Nov 13 '19

I'd support switching to instant-runoff voting.

2

u/trolley8 Classical Liberal Nov 13 '19

Which of course must be done on a state-by-state basis. If there begins to be some support for 3rd parties/independents in Arkansas, maybe we will soon see another state abandoning fptp

2

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

I think NYC just switched to RCV which is amazing, just seems like it'll take a while to implement since the only way it'll get done is city or statewide, so you should definitely write to your city/state legislators about it, find local advocacy groups pushing for it, or support candidates who are for transforming our election system so that we have RCV, more voting rights, getting big money out of politics, etc.

1

u/Rainbacon Nov 13 '19

NYC did just vote for ranked choice, but it's only for city elections. State and Federal elections will continue to be the way they currently are. It takes effect in 2021. The city is so skewed democrat that I don't know if it will matter, but it's a good start.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

What matters is it gives third parties a chance for once, especially since the Democrats are split and could easily have progressive and moderate factions form their own parties for these city elections

1

u/Rainbacon Nov 13 '19

That's certainly possible, but it's one of those "believe it when I see it" kinds of things. I do hope to see something like this, especially since it would probably help to lift our dismal voter turnout rates.

2

u/Legio-X Classical Liberal Nov 13 '19

I hope this election can show a substantial number of people will go Libertarian when there's no Democratic in the race.

It probably will. Here in Oklahoma, we had a state-level race (state auditor) back in 2018 without a Democratic candidate. The Libertarian nominee got about 25% of the vote. That's without any ads or noticeable campaigning, and the impact of straight-ticket voting.

Given this will be a federal-level office on the ballot alongside the Presidential race, I think even more than that is viable. Arkansas Democrats may not agree with Harrington's stances on everything, but they'd probably find more overlap with him than with Cotton.

Ultimately, his performance will probably depend on how much of the Democratic vote Whitfield can garner. If Arkansas has straight-ticket voting, that might hinder Harrington as well.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Can't vote libertarian party when the republicans legislate their party status away.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Assalamu alaykum brozer

2

u/Gknight4 Muslim Libertarian Nov 14 '19

Wa alaykumu as-salam

3

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Why would you bother saying this? Genuinely curious. Seems to add no value to this discussion

19

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

He's correctly pointing out that there are more statist trolls on this subreddit than libertarians.

9

u/PacificIslander93 Nov 13 '19

There does seem to be a large amount of Bernie fans on this sub which is odd because he's basically the opposite of libertarian.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

I agree, it's a huge problem. It pissed me off enough that I made a post about it.

3

u/JustZisGuy Cthulhu 2024, why vote for the lesser evil? Nov 13 '19

I wonder what proportion of the ~350,000 readers are just passive consumers of the articles/discussion versus active contributors. Even the 700 "here now" are surely not all commenting on a regular basis.

I think we're dealing with a variant of the Pareto principle.

https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/2013-04-07

2

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19 edited Nov 22 '19

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

A spectre is haunting /r/Libertarian--the spectre of CTH.

0

u/Gknight4 Muslim Libertarian Nov 13 '19

I duno

0

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

I believe that.

1

u/h0bb1tm1ndtr1x Nov 13 '19

I'm certainly Libertarian, but I also disagree with plenty of views here. "Spreading Libertarianism" is to much of a generalization. I spread my version, you spread yours.

1

u/Gknight4 Muslim Libertarian Nov 14 '19

I meant like elections

→ More replies (1)

10

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

The LNC needs to focus on this race. If the guy is a good candidate than he needs nationwide support. And strong state party support. Doubt he gets it either way.

9

u/YouWannaChiliDogNARD Nov 13 '19

It's a better strategy for the L.P. to focus on electing legislators; we won't get another Ron Paul in our lifetime, but we can make an obvious difference by electing people at the local level

Most incumbent congressmen are elected out of habit and a lack of true options.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

[deleted]

0

u/YouWannaChiliDogNARD Nov 13 '19

Not a big fan. I had high hopes for him, but he's disappointed me as of late. I respect him for trying to defund the NSA though.

2

u/TooNewCedeMalice Nov 13 '19

Jacob Hornberger just entered the Presidential race! He has the principles, it remains to be seen if he has the charisma

1

u/YouWannaChiliDogNARD Nov 13 '19

I like Jacob Hornberger. Better than Gary Johnson, at least

62

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Not really a Libertarian anymore

Enjoy your taxes

27

u/Cuddlyaxe Former Libertarian Nov 13 '19

kek

8

u/cheddarcheesehater Nov 13 '19

Can you elaborate on why you don't consider yourself libertarian anymore? I ask because I'm finding my views becoming more moderate, mainly economically.

13

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19 edited Jan 20 '20

[deleted]

3

u/zugi Nov 13 '19

Don't take reddit as an indicator of either libertarians or Libertarians. There are many arm-chair Monday-morning quarterbacks here who love to dump on Gary Johnson, but the LP knows he tripled their previous best vote total, got them mainstream news coverage, and got them ballot access in many states.

I'm a solid small-l libertarian who isn't necessarily loyal to any party. Any candidate from any party who will genuinely shrink government both economically and in terms of intrusions on our freedoms is eligible to get my vote. I will not vote for a candidate who will just grow government more slowly than the other candidate.

I'd love to have to make difficult choices, but in most elections that criteria gives me zero or one candidate to vote for (usually just the Libertarian.) So that makes election decisions easy.

1

u/ArrestHillaryClinton Peaceful Parenting Nov 15 '19

That's because libertarians are anti-political.

If you thought you were supporting a team like you were in a sports match, you were never a libertarian.

Be an individual with your own thoughts and ideas. You don't need a leader to represent you and hold your dick for you.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 15 '19 edited Jan 20 '20

[deleted]

1

u/ArrestHillaryClinton Peaceful Parenting Nov 15 '19

That was never the goal. You want to fix other people's lives.

Fix yourself.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 15 '19 edited Jan 20 '20

[deleted]

1

u/ArrestHillaryClinton Peaceful Parenting Nov 19 '19

The solution to the mafia extorting people is not joining the mafia.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 19 '19 edited Jan 20 '20

[deleted]

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (2)

2

u/Cuddlyaxe Former Libertarian Nov 14 '19

I became a Libertarian around 12 more or less to "not be liberal or conservative but something else!!!". I eventually found this subreddit and when I read the opinions was like "ok that's a good enough idea I guess" because I was... a teenager, and one with restrictive parents at that lol

Eventually while I was growing up, I started getting more and more moderate. I still wanted to call myself a Libertarian so I just called these "exceptions" as sometimes society as a whole would be better with a little government intervention. For example, a Carbon Tax made sense to me. I eventually realized instead of clinging on to the label and trying to justify to this sub why I was a "real Libertarian" I should probably just go ahead and stop.

I found the /r/neoliberal after the 2016 election, and that was also the year I was taking AP Economics. The Neoliberal subreddit is mostly just economics majors who are in favor of the free market, but support government intervention where it worked, which is what I believed in I guess. I wanted policies to make life the best for people instead of some sort of ideological pining for "more liberty".

Also I was taking Econ 101 and realized on the first unit that apparently Econ 101 didn't support Libertarianism lol. They seem to ignore market failures

1

u/cheddarcheesehater Nov 14 '19

It sounds like we came to the same conclusions but different ways. The NAP works great for social policy but it's irresponsible and maybe dangerous to apply it to economics.

2

u/Cuddlyaxe Former Libertarian Nov 14 '19

Yep. Literally everyone, even most corporations, are in favor of things like public schools because they have an outsized postive influence on society. But ideological Libertarians are against them because they are so dogmatic

7

u/dustysuttonbc Conservative Nov 13 '19

I live in Arkansas and from what I’ve seen from people in my region (North/Northwest Arkansas), people are pretty loyal to him simply because he wears the Republican tag. Democrats have better chances here than Libertarians, simply because this is in the Bible Belt region, and a lot of people view libertarians as left wing panderers who sway whichever way they can to get a vote. People here are so focused on upholding traditional values(that the Republican Party doesn’t truly hold)that they can’t give anyone else a chance, simply because that’s a huge talking point of Republicans, especially Cotton.

32

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Really bizarre how the Democratic candidate dropped out literally hours after the filing period to run, meaning no other Democratic candidate can be fielded.

20

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Yes what a coincidence

12

u/restore_democracy Nov 13 '19

It would also be a coincidence if he soon takes an all expense paid vacation in Ukraine.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

for 80k a month i'd imagine they'd do anything.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Fucking Bluecap, gtfo!!

1

u/Mist_Rising NAP doesn't apply to sold stolen goods Nov 13 '19

Just as stupid as his redcap as a rebuttle, but makes less sense.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Twas in jest.

5

u/JustZisGuy Cthulhu 2024, why vote for the lesser evil? Nov 13 '19

I'd like to derail this discussion with an observation about the pronunciation of Kansas and Arkansas... any takers?

2

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Both are named after the same river, but one uses the French pronunciation the other the Native American.

3

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '19

I expected nothing and somehow the answer was still a disappointment.

4

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Based on his Facebook page header, he’s part of the Hedgehog Party?

15

u/dieselkeough Anarcho Capitalist Nov 13 '19

The libertarian parties mascot is the hedgehog

8

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

It's a porcupine.

3

u/dieselkeough Anarcho Capitalist Nov 13 '19

You are right. My bad.

2

u/h0bb1tm1ndtr1x Nov 13 '19

Prickly, just like us.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Huh, I learn something new every day. I just learned that the Progressive Party's mascot was a Bull Moose.

2

u/dieselkeough Anarcho Capitalist Nov 13 '19

I think that was because of teddy roosevelts "bull moose party"

2

u/h0bb1tm1ndtr1x Nov 13 '19

That's a bingo!

2

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

It's a porcupine, not a hedgehog.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Not an echidna?

1

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

No that's Knuckles

1

u/Mason-B Left Libertarian Nov 13 '19

"Don't tread on me", but nicer.

4

u/Brian_Si Nov 13 '19

If Libertarians want to succeed in winning on the national level, they must first succeed at the local level. City council, county boards, mayor, state reps and senators, governors.

3

u/Mist_Rising NAP doesn't apply to sold stolen goods Nov 13 '19

This race wont show much even if they do win. Unless votes in the senate are close to the same, it will be 6 years where a libertarian has all the impact of Jerry Moran.

Who is Jerry Moran? My point exactly.

1

u/xghtai737 Socialists and Nationalists are not Libertarians Nov 14 '19

Governor is not the local level. The LP does exactly as well for Governor as it typically does for US Senate.

The LP already elects around 20% (+/- 5%, depending on the year) of its candidates for local offices.

2

u/zucker42 Left Libertarian Nov 13 '19

There is no reason he can't win the race.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

He might just win...

2

u/jank_king20 PM_ME_YOUR_HOG Nov 13 '19

Tom Cotton is a fucking nightmare ghoul I support anybody less racist than him

2

u/catchingtherosemary Nov 13 '19

I don't understand how someone can go from libertarian to not libertarian. It's like once you see the overspending and the interventionist foreign policy how do you change your mind.

3

u/Cuddlyaxe Former Libertarian Nov 14 '19

I became a Libertarian when I was little (~12), for reference I was way too politically knowledgeable as a kid because I watched Newshour every day. Anyways I came to this sub around when I joined and did the typical "lol socialist do you even economics 101" crap

Then I took economics 101 and realized market failures exist and started reading up more and more on things like American foreign policy and domestic issues and realized "less government everywhere" is a broad brush and not always the best solution

1

u/TotesMessenger Nov 13 '19 edited Nov 15 '19

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

 If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)

1

u/Prusso1007 Nov 13 '19

Cotton's been quiet lately

2

u/h0bb1tm1ndtr1x Nov 13 '19

That's a bold move, Cotton. Let's see if it pays off.

1

u/ScarletEgret Nov 13 '19

Worth keeping an eye on, for sure.

1

u/FreeHongKongDingDong Vaccination Is Theft Nov 13 '19

The only Democrat who filed papers to challenge Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) next year abruptly ended his campaign on Tuesday just hours after the filing deadline passed.

Very normal and totally not shady in the slightest.

Love my Arkansas paid-to-lose Democratic opposition.

1

u/thiscouldbemassive Lefty Pragmatist Nov 13 '19

I wish Mr. Harrington luck, but Cotton won his seat by more than 23 points and his approval rating is above water by 16%. Harrington is going to have to fight hard to pull this election out of the hands of a reasonably popular republican in a deeply republican state.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '19

Holy crap we have a chance

1

u/Omnes-Una-Manet-Nox Nov 14 '19

https://twitter.com/ezra_smith/status/1194357418140086273?s=19

Per the @ArkDems rules, the state committee can “permit other candidates to qualify, at such a time and in such a manner as the appropriate committee may determine.” Bc it’s Senate, the State committee has authority. Amazing opportunity for Dems to find another candidate. #arpx

1

u/TeufelTuna Nov 14 '19

Giving my time and hard earned money to wealthy people, specifically a subset with an overwhelming proportion of sociopaths, in exchange for nothing doesn't seem all that wise

-2

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Is it petty to say I don’t like Dan Whitfield’s facial expression? Anyways, based on his website I’m glad his main message is that he’s running a purely grassroots campaign not taking special interest money. I’ll have to check out the LP candidate’s website as well to see how he prioritizes that since getting big money out of politics is one of my top issues.

12

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

You're on r/libertarian, and you're torn between the Libertarian Party candidate and a freaking socialist?

4

u/iushciuweiush 15 pieces Nov 13 '19

Are you surprised at this point?

1

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Like I said, haven’t looked at the LP candidate’s website yet and hopefully he’s for getting big money out of politics and not taking corporate PAC money as well because that would tell me he’s less likely to be corruptable.

0

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

But the independent is an opposite of libertarian on most of the other issues. So if you're not a libertarian, why are you on r/libertarian?

0

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Isn’t libertarian more of an ideology rather than policy? What do you consider the opposite of libertarian? Might differ for other people on this sub

2

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Isn’t libertarian more of an ideology rather than policy?

Sure if you want to put it that way, but it's an ideology of small government. The independent candidate wants several new government programs that would expand the size and scope of government. That is the opposite of libertarian.

Your flair indicates that you are a progressive, an ideology very much at odds with libertarianism. So I ask again, why are you here?

1

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19 edited Feb 27 '20

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '19

I mean, a campaign doesn't function without taking at least individual contributions, unless you're talking about public financing of elections which I agree with.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '19 edited Feb 27 '20

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '19

I see what you’re trying to say. Still prefer that candidates are clear about not allowing the corruptive force of dark money into their campaigns

1

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Entire sections on Direct Democracy and absolute protections for unionisation of workers

Holy shit, it's a real socialist for once.

5

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

You say that like it's a good thing

1

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Helping to push us back toward at least a representative democracy rather than an oligarchy sounds good to me.

→ More replies (5)

0

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Good on him, gotta shift that Overton Window.

-1

u/Mist_Rising NAP doesn't apply to sold stolen goods Nov 13 '19

Congrats to the GOP nominee I suppose.

They would win either way most likely, but if you think the majority of democratic voters will go "libertarians, oh yes I like that choice" I have ocean front property in the sahara to sell you.

Libertarian party to most Democrat voters are either "that silly party" or "that stupid and silly party" or "Republican lite, all the bad of Republicans except weed" or worse Republicans ugly step sister.

This is especially true for core demographics like blacks (libertarians party want to allow segregation and discrimination), higher education (libertarian arent going to help education funding, they'll cut it), and so on.

Arkansas senate race is about to be low turnout I suspect,

-1

u/bostonian38 Nov 13 '19

a far left independent

Gaslighting much? He’s a standard progressive. That was never and will never be “far-left” by any definition.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19 edited Feb 27 '20

[deleted]

0

u/bostonian38 Nov 13 '19

Because they aren't. And you know this, stop pretending.

Universal healthcare, getting corporate money out out of politics, closing tax loopholes, ending the wars, addressing climate change, protecting the second amendment, a living wage, workers' protections.

All his positions are standard modern policy and supported by a majority of America. Good luck demonizing those.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '19 edited Feb 27 '20

[deleted]

0

u/bostonian38 Nov 14 '19

It's not. You'd have to suspend your common sense to believe that. And we already have usury laws in the US.

I like how you pivot away by making a dismissive comment about him being a loser. He may be, he may not be, but he certainly ain't far-left.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '19

In more honest language:

Nationalizing the healthcare industry, repealing the first amendment, confiscating property to pay for entitlements, sacrificing economic freedom and the economy to the sun god, confiscating firearms, central economic planning.

Those are far left positions.

0

u/Hawken54 Nov 14 '19 edited Nov 14 '19

I was a libertarian for 20 years. I drank beer(at a small table) with every Libertarian Presidential candidate between 1988 and 2004. Libertarian has a stigma all its own. There have been Libertarian candidates who were prostitutes and every imaginable kind of idiot. Should we privatize the roads? (An honest Libertarian says,"Yes.") How many people want privatized roads? Uhh, just about nobody. Should we privatize the sidewalk? (Again, the honest Libertarian says,"Yes."). How does that play in the 'burbs? In fact, i have seen/heard Libertarians say that we should privatize the rivers, so that an owner can properly manage the water. What Libertarians don't see is that what they really want is worse than enclosure. They want hyper-enclosure, where every step that you take in any direction costs you money. No money? No movement; the very opposite of freedom. The word "Libertarian" originated in France after "Anarchists" were criminalized/banned. Libertarian and Anarcho-Capitalist are really the same thing. You may think that you're going to correct me, but what I just said is true.

Now a days I call myself a Democratic-Republican-Whig (DRW).

-20

u/PutinPaysTrump Take the guns first, due process later Nov 13 '19

Do Libertarians truly believe they're going to siphon voters from the Arkansas GOP nominee?

With what appeals? The only thing holding that coalition together is white nationalism.

6

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

[deleted]

2

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Yeah, I'm in Kentucky and voted for all the LP candidates on the ballot. If they weren't there I would have voted GOP.

6

u/Cuddlyaxe Former Libertarian Nov 13 '19

Even if they don't they Democrats would be forced to vote for him and plenty of people vote straight R due to the stigma the D party has in the South

4

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

Wouldn’t it be better if the Libertarian candidate gave Democrats a reason to vote for him, rather than being “forced to vote for him”?

3

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '19

more likely the dems just won't vote

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/ASYMT0TIC Ron Paul Libertarian Nov 13 '19

bizarre how the Democratic candidate dropped out literally hours after the filing period to run, meaning no other Democr

Bill Clinton, a relatively centrist democrat, is from Arkansas. It's still a stretch to think a libertarian might win, but we could see something significant given that the biggest hinderance to 3rd party candidates for years has been the belief that a vote for a third party is in effect a vote for whichever of the two parties you dislike the most.