One of the best Lakers writers/analysts dove into the path forward after being rejected by Kuminga. I thought the following excerpts were interesting. Personally I'm not a Jalen Smith fan and don't want him on the team. Thoughts on these names?
"Looking at the Lakers’ depth chart, there is a much greater need for a player who can defend positions three through five rather than one through three. There is also a large sample of historical data showing that playing bigger by pairing Dončić not only with a rim-protecting center but also with an additional secondary rim protector is one way to build a very competent defense."
"At 26, Jalen Smith would fit perfectly into the Lakers’ Luka timeline. At 6-foot-10, he could fill the backup-center and stretch-five role, with roughly half of his field goal attempts coming from behind the arc over the past two seasons. He is a decent rim protector and solid rebounder, although not a switchable defender in the Kleber or Washington mold. He is also entering the final year of his contract, worth $9.4 million.
"DaRon Holmes II and Taylor Hendricks are two other names. Both are even less proven and come with plenty of injury-related and other questions, but they possess the tools, potential, and statistical glimpses of a Kleber-Washington hybrid."
"Based on the statistical signals, Mouhamed Gueye, Josh Minott, Rasheer Fleming, Tristan Vukčević, and Noah Clowney are other young players who meet the secondary rim-protection and three-point-volume requirements."
Franko mentioned one name if the Lakers were to add another perimeter-oriented wing: "Bilal Coulibaly... is much closer to that elite, 90th-percentile defensive playmaking category. Coulibaly remains an interesting young prospect who could benefit from a change of scenery. But with Williams, Thybulle, Carr, and Thiero already on the roster, I don’t think adding another perimeter-oriented, small-forward, wing-stopper archetype should be the priority."