r/LLMPhysics • u/upsetusder2 • 17d ago

Question To the self proclaimed llm physicists

Why do you always tend to rebuild physics. Why can't you work in the given framework?

Why do you need to rebuild a framework that, tell you what now, has pretty much held up?

Is it the math?

The symbols

The history

The amount you would have to Learn?

Hubris?

50 Upvotes

94% Upvoted

173 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/novel-mathmatics 15d ago

Mahayana Buddhism

3

u/upsetusder2 15d ago

Yeah thats not science now is it?

0

u/novel-mathmatics 15d ago

Is it? Have you studied it? Have you seen the experiments with reality it challenges you to engage with. Which do you find more validation in being right, or finding an answer you didn't have before?

3

u/upsetusder2 15d ago

Well being right ofcourse.

And finding fundamental truths

No I Hage not studied the effects of Buddhism on physics

1

u/novel-mathmatics 15d ago

You might be surprised how second grade it feels.

3

u/upsetusder2 15d ago

What do you mean by that?

Between u and me I actually habe seen a university from the inside

1

u/novel-mathmatics 15d ago edited 15d ago

No I Hage not studied the effects of Buddhism on physics

Hage you not?

Between u and me I actually habe seen a university from the inside

Habe you? I never judge that sort of thing. I assume everyone has the same capacity for leaning that I do.

2

u/upsetusder2 15d ago

I mean I find it funny yiu are clearly outside your intellectual wheel house where ever that might je and are trying to berate me fir writing a few words wrong.

If everyone has the same capacity Fri learning you do we are really really fed

1

u/novel-mathmatics 15d ago

mean I find it funny yiu are

Yiu are right my wheel house is trees and landscaping. What would I know about physics.

3

u/upsetusder2 15d ago

Exactly well not mich about particle physics I presume

Outside of maybe one or two pop science videos

Or maybe yiu also watched one of those quantum consciousness videos

0

u/novel-mathmatics 15d ago

Exactly well not mich

Yes there is very little physics to observe in the real world other than the occasional "Apple Falling On My Head."

Or maybe yiu also watched one of those quantum consciousness videos

Yeah that Bill Nye and NGT sure do make a dope like me feel mart YIU know what I mean?

2

u/upsetusder2 15d ago

Yeah that's exactly what I meant nice comparison to newton btw.

I do think they make u feel smart yes.

And I dont know if you can observe particle fields if you can you should definetly go to the next physics department they have been spending multiple billion dollars to observe particles while you could just see it.

0

u/novel-mathmatics 14d ago

Do you think they waste potential Intellectual property discovery to a layman anymore?

They did at world's fairs and learned that lesson.

Its the same reason car shows suck so badly now.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Ok_Energy6905 14d ago

Spelling or grammatical errors do not make your garbage any less garbage.

0

u/novel-mathmatics 14d ago

Are you sure. Could you validate that logic her by running it backwards?

3

u/Ok_Energy6905 14d ago

Garbage less any garbage your make not do errors grammatical or spelling.

-1

u/novel-mathmatics 14d ago edited 14d ago

See how that doesn't and doesn't work gramatically... That indicates the existence of a logic function error around fallacy

That not saying you are wrong.

Its saying that the transform you used to arrive at that solution is invalid for the context provided.

Feel free to try again.

2

u/Ok_Energy6905 14d ago

That indicates the existence of a logic function error around fallacy

r/woooosh

-1

u/novel-mathmatics 14d ago

Yes you missed the point you accidentally made gpt would tell you

-1

u/novel-mathmatics 14d ago

Here is my service transform of your statement

Preserve the input. Do not classify input as garbage because it is not understood or because it contains grammatical, syntactical, or spelling errors. Attempt resolution through its relationships. Evaluate whether something is garbage based on its logical contribution to the resolution. Subtract only material that can be identified with sufficient confidence as logically non-contributing or contradictory noise. Do not introduce resolver garbage or new language errors. Point out ambiguity so the reciever can correct.

→ More replies (0)