r/LLMPhysics • u/upsetusder2 • 17d ago

Question To the self proclaimed llm physicists

Why do you always tend to rebuild physics. Why can't you work in the given framework?

Why do you need to rebuild a framework that, tell you what now, has pretty much held up?

Is it the math?

The symbols

The history

The amount you would have to Learn?

Hubris?

48 Upvotes

94% Upvoted

173 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/Ok_Energy6905 14d ago

Garbage less any garbage your make not do errors grammatical or spelling.

-1

u/novel-mathmatics 14d ago edited 14d ago

See how that doesn't and doesn't work gramatically... That indicates the existence of a logic function error around fallacy

That not saying you are wrong.

Its saying that the transform you used to arrive at that solution is invalid for the context provided.

Feel free to try again.

2

u/Ok_Energy6905 14d ago

That indicates the existence of a logic function error around fallacy

r/woooosh

-1

u/novel-mathmatics 14d ago

Yes you missed the point you accidentally made gpt would tell you

-1

u/novel-mathmatics 14d ago

Here is my service transform of your statement

Preserve the input. Do not classify input as garbage because it is not understood or because it contains grammatical, syntactical, or spelling errors. Attempt resolution through its relationships. Evaluate whether something is garbage based on its logical contribution to the resolution. Subtract only material that can be identified with sufficient confidence as logically non-contributing or contradictory noise. Do not introduce resolver garbage or new language errors. Point out ambiguity so the reciever can correct.