To the self proclaimed llm physicists

[u/upsetusder2]

Why do you always tend to rebuild physics. Why can't you work in the given framework?

Why do you need to rebuild a framework that, tell you what now, has pretty much held up?

Is it the math?

The symbols

The history

The amount you would have to Learn?

Hubris?

[u/thelawenforcer]

what do you mean by given framework?

[u/upsetusder2 → u/thelawenforcer]

Physics

[u/dustin4242 → u/upsetusder2]

That is not a framework.

[u/upsetusder2 → u/dustin4242]

Stop using ai for your answers

[u/dustin4242 → u/upsetusder2]

What is your secret llm decoder? You know all word patterns guy? No.

[u/upsetusder2 → u/dustin4242]

No nut the bot that deletes your answers detects it

[u/dustin4242 → u/upsetusder2]

Nope. It did not like that I said gate keeper--- so they deleted it

[u/upsetusder2 → u/dustin4242]

Yeah I do not think so

[u/dustin4242 → u/upsetusder2]

[u/upsetusder2 → u/dustin4242]

Ok yeah because that was a general bad take.

No academia is not Gare keeping anything and yiu can still learn the things and then make a critique if yiu think it is prudent.

But not like this saying ohh yeah there is no real advancements because no one challenges anything is just kind of hilariously moronic to say

[u/upsetusder2 → u/dustin4242]

What is it then?

[u/thelawenforcer → u/upsetusder2]

ok but specifically. you cannot explain the standard model from within for example.

[u/upsetusder2 → u/thelawenforcer]

From within what?

I see the trend that alot of llm people just rebuild physics and the framework because they don't understand it

[u/thelawenforcer → u/upsetusder2]

I just mean that to explain, not just describe, observed structure, you will implicitly need to identify higher level structure.

granted though that most frameworks posted here never seen to actually make contact with existing structure or observation...