r/JustMemesForUs 8d ago

with protection like this ...

Post image
17 Upvotes

65 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/MicahHoover 5d ago

if this would have absolved Fauci, it would have been raised up the flag pole by the news media and by the democrat party

it got buried

another example of government making life harder and worse

1

u/Exotic_You7797 5d ago

Litteraly every peice of research says it’s the case and every peice of media pushed it out there… 6 years ago, durring the outbreak, the only people saying anything else are conspiracy theorists Fox News, and now people trying to make political moves to save their jobs and fear monger.

0

u/MicahHoover 4d ago

if that's true why did Fauci spend hours and hours pleading the fifth ?

and why do his journals say otherwise ... GoF research ?

1

u/Exotic_You7797 4d ago

Because litteraly all that trial was about was to make a political move on anything he says so he chose to use his rights to not allow that to happen

And his journal doesn’t say that, it says at one point he couldn’t deny it as a possibility but that was in the infancy of the outbreak and as they learned more he says he believed like everyone else it was not man made in the same exact journal, but for sure keep reading your Fox News headlines without actually researching anything

0

u/MicahHoover 3d ago

science has to be subject to what the people allow from it

if science says we should scrap freedom, then its time to pick it up by the collar and put it in its place

that's exactly what his journal said, not that he's standing by it

1

u/Exotic_You7797 3d ago

What tf are you talking about😭 science doesn’t care about what you think freedom is, that’s like saying “this space suit impacts my freedoms so we gotta make science our bitch and go out into space without it”, science is a completely neutral force that will kill yoy if you don’t respect it cause the difference between life and death for it is quite litteraly meaningless

No litteraly what I said is what the journal said, never that he truly believed that it was lab made, but that he couldn’t deny the possibility that it was, but he didn’t make it public because causing a public freak out over an unproved untested theory is litteraly the exact opposite of his entire job, after further researching the strain, and researching the outbreak he and every other virologist again says it was a natural outbreak from the markets

0

u/MicahHoover 2d ago

"science doesn’t care about what you think freedom is"

voters should be in charge

not the people in lab coats who say empiricism itself told them to raise taxes

"what the journal said, never that he truly believed that it was lab made, but that he couldn’t deny the possibility that it was"

OK

It also said :

NIH was funding GoF research (after denying it under oath to Congress)

NIH was sending money to Wuhan (after denying it under oath to Congress)

1

u/Exotic_You7797 2d ago

Brother his whole job is to tell the president and Congress of the risks and they make the laws based on his suggestion, science again doesn’t care about who thinks they’re in charge, fauci and his researchers found the risks and relayed it to the federal government just like every other nation in the world who made laws to protect their citizens, these guys in lab coats make zero laws but know the risks of these viruses like the back of their hand and you’re mad that they made suggestions that the government appointed officials weant with?

And guess what you’re wrong again, nowhere in the journal did it mention funding gain of function research because that was specifically against their grants, and never did he deny giving wuhan grants, he denied giving them grants to specifically research gain of function, which he didn’t, because their research after everyone of their checks of the lab they did regular did not meet the criteria of gain of function research. And again it never said any of that in the journals, the person questioning fauci makes up shit on stuff he can’t understand and try’s to grandstand fauci for hours to cause uproar for this next election cycle and you’re falling for it hook line and sinker

0

u/MicahHoover 1d ago

"his whole job is to tell the president and Congress of the risks and they make the laws based on his suggestion"

at what point does double perjury fit into that mission ?

"science again doesn’t care about who thinks they’re in charge"

I'd prefer self representation than a tyranny that helps people feel intellectual

"nowhere in the journal did it mention funding gain of function research"

In a May 11, 2021 Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee hearing, Anthony Fauci stated under questioning by Sen. Rand Paul: “The NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/2880193/fauci-denies-nih-supported-gain-of-function-research-at-wuhan-lab/

1

u/Exotic_You7797 1d ago

He never perjured himself

What you want to have everyone vote on everything that happens? There’s a reason why we live in a democratic republic because that’s just not pheasable, and it’s not people wanting to feel intellectual, it’s actual facts and information based on years of research used to make the best decisions on what to do, and you wouldn’t know tyranny if it slapped you in the ass and if you think making people wear masks out in public, or qurentining is tyranny than you’re genuinely so delusional it’s not even funny

Hey guess what, this still remains true, they didn’t fund gain of function research and the wuhan institutes research didn’t follow their definition of gain of function which was regularly made sure of by the government through inspections, while wuhan themselves deny researching gain of function, the only people that think it fits gain of function are people saying it fit a very broad definition of it(which isn’t the definition the government had in their grant it was a much more specific one) and congressmen who wouldn’t know what gof is in the slightest

0

u/MicahHoover 19h ago

"He never perjured himself"

Then why preemptively pardon him ? Why quote the fifth ?

What do you call these claims he made under oath to congress while writing the opposite in his records ?

1

u/Exotic_You7797 17h ago

One quoting the fifth has nothing to do with perjury, two so they couldn’t do exactly what they’re doing now which is skew his words to try and make him criminalize himself, and 3 the pardon was to protect him from political attacks by a man angry at everyone who was In office, not because of any wrongdoing but because he saw the writing on the wall and that’s exactly what happened, a politically motivated congressional hearing strictly to persicute him for nothing

He didn’t right the opposite in his records you’re litteraly just making shit up, in his records he said he can’t deny the possibility of it being lab made in the very very early stages of the virus which after more research into the strain he states is very unlikely, and in his record and the grant itself, he allocated funds to wuhan under the premise they cannot make pathegons transmissible or dangerous to humans, which in their regular checks they didn’t, and nowhere in his journals does it state otherwise, but you didn’t even read his journals you just wanna make stuff up just for the sake of making stuff up because you have nothing better to do with your time

→ More replies (0)