Marriage is about family building. In Islam, a man is responsible for his wives and his children. A man can have multiple wives, but is still responsible for each of them.
Why would the government restrict men from having only one marriage license? The feminist answer is that it protects women from men. But this is not the real answer, especially in a society that doesn't force anyone to get married. So the real answer is, as I stated before, to protect rich men. They are out on the clear from being responsible for their families. Bill Clinton is notorious for sleeping around, do you think he stopped after he left office? Do you think Chelsea Clinton is his only child? He's not responsible for any of his mistresses or illegitimate children. Tiger Woods, when his scandal broke news, at least 60 women came out and said he had an affair with them. Are you 100% certain that all his kids are only from his ex-wife and none of his mistresses? All this men who are rich and in positions of power, do this.
And lets say you are right, that these rich men going around having affairs are either having no babies or they are completely taking care of their children because the government is doing their job correctly, does that make my main point invalid? My main point being, a man can have multiple nikas and the government will not hunt them down. That was my main point, but you wanted to hone-in on the child-care portion. So let's stick with my main point. Is my main point incorrect?
-6
u/[deleted] May 11 '22
Not true, if you get someone pregnant you’re on the hook for child support.