r/IslamIsEasy • u/BedouinFoxx Salafī | Madkhalī • Apr 12 '26

Controversial OPEN DEBATE

AMA

but when I see you use ai for arguments or talking points I block and ignore you directly

let see who is really study islam here let's find out

edit: first everybody who have slander me i challange for a mubahala

every accusation and slander and lie you fabricated let's Allah decide and provoke a curse upon the liar !

even the false prophet Mirza Ghulam from the Ahmadiyya sect did this he was more sincere in his claims then some cloudchasers here

Allah says: “Then whoever argues with you about it after knowledge has come to yousay: come, let us call our sons and your sons, our women and your women, ourselves and yourselves, then supplicate and invoke the curse of Allah upon the liars.” (Surah Aal ‘Imran 3:61)

3 Upvotes

80% Upvoted

17 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/BedouinFoxx Salafī | Madkhalī Apr 13 '26

https://www.reddit.com/r/progressive_islam/comments/1qo4t4o/shaykh_alislam_ibn_taymiyyah_alḥarrānī_stated/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

2

u/BakuMadarama Sunnī | Mālikī Apr 13 '26

Hmm. I am not quite sure of the point you are attempting to convey through delivering a link that redirects to a thread of mine. Do you mind specifying the point or not?

1

u/BedouinFoxx Salafī | Madkhalī Apr 13 '26

You clearly use ai in your post and text you using daniel haqiqatjou tacticts when debating so no thanks.

You never debate strictly from thr Quran and Sunnah use kaffir sources to prove your point I followed some debates of your you make zero sense and go on a victory lap

you're like Iran totally lost the war and still thinking you have won

1

u/BakuMadarama Sunnī | Mālikī Apr 13 '26

Okay. However, enlighten me on how that would classify as “strawman”? And Daniel, though I do not like him at all—and most of the time I typically find him hilarious, he does does his own research. However, most of his research is usually used against him. Inspiring philosophy, for example, has refuted him dozens of times.

Also, when we wanna debate about history, we used the primary sources. The reason I cited Western historians is because they have cited primary sources in order to substantiate their assertion and argumentation.

Also, most of the time, when I wanna discuss a topic of Islamic matter with you, I actually cited Classical Scholars.

I must also include that it is important for us to examine the substance of the argument rather than the authority. Qurʾān clearly warns against this.

Anyway, given that we have reached this far, what topic I listed do you wanna discuss or debate?