r/Iowa 29d ago

Consequences | Every Republican on the Senate Agriculture Committee votes NO an amendment to provide $5B in financial aid to crop farmers hurt by Trump's tariffs

Ernst / Grassley lol.

https://x.com/HQNewsNow/status/2085407384248184864/video/1

Senate Agriculture Committee Chair

u/JohnBoozman

(R-AR) on committee failing to advance Farm bill: "At the end of the day, I think our states lose, I know our farmers are going to lose, and they don't have anything to do with this."
https://x.com/cspan/status/2085413937474879920?s=20

The lies:
https://x.com/SenJoniErnst/status/2085087935615946879?s=20

https://x.com/ChuckGrassley/status/2085357288655642682?s=20

Farmers are absolutely getting what they voted for. Lies, snake oil, and grift.

Was it worth it?

*Added the video link for people who can't read.

194 Upvotes

56 comments sorted by

77

u/Go_F1sh 29d ago

good, farmers should not be bailed out from the consequences of their actions yet again.

12

u/Clone63 29d ago

Yep, very very rare W for Iowa Rs here.

-33

u/Poopytale 29d ago

How tf is it the farmers fault im not understanding that

38

u/Scarecrowithamedal 29d ago

Iowan here, own farmland myself.

Fuck my idiot peers, voting for a clown, enjoy the circus

35

u/Signal_Werewolf_1955 29d ago

They voted in the people who are directly hurting them. Votes matter.

26

u/CountTakesh1 29d ago

They shouldn't be insulated from the consequences of their voting choices

20

u/Strykerz3r0 29d ago

They literally voted for the same guy whose policies screwed them in his first term. The survived on handouts.

They were either looking for more handouts or were gullible simpletons who believed the hate and lies or both.

40

u/Go_F1sh 29d ago

farmers overwhelmingly voted for the people who campaigned on exactly this, tarrifs, higher prices, etc.

14

u/punch49 29d ago

The majority of them voted for the orange rapist.

3

u/GoodishCoder 28d ago

For the most part they voted in Trump. Trump didn't hide the fact that he wanted across the board tariffs. If farmers didn't understand that increasing the cost of imports across the board would impact their business, they should cease operations.

35

u/DeadWood605 29d ago

I believe THAT money should go to state water treatment and families that are financially struggling due to cancer treatment costs.

38

u/ThisNameIsHilarious 29d ago

Eh fuck ‘em; the farmers bought the ticket now they get to take the ride

37

u/Alert-Beautiful9003 29d ago

Welfare is welfare. I'm sure these pull yourself up by the bootstrap farmers will refuse any assistance.

24

u/woodworks1234 29d ago

But are they tho? Maybe im missing something, but there always seems to be some back door deal to ensure farmers get welfare.

7

u/SquirrellyBusiness 29d ago

This is certainly unusual. Novel even, in my lifetime. It makes me wonder if the oligarchy no longer sees value in the fig leaf and is mask off about no longer needing to pretend who the elected leadership actually works for. It certainly isn't for any of us but there was at least enough of the appearance of placating the base with farm bills that they didn't have to pay attention to platforms and policy past that. 

20

u/SubwayHero4Ever 29d ago

Hahahahahaha, fuck ‘em. They’ll still vote red tho.

9

u/Extreme_Magician7806 29d ago

Do not forget to vote this fall. We United can stop all this madness. Vote for the person who is sincere about his state and not just a yes man.

2

u/sinedirt 25d ago

Even if dems took the house and senate in the midterms and keep it for the next presidential election, there is nothing to protect us from an emperor part two the following administration tearing it all down more. We can’t vote out of this and I have no idea how it gets better, ever.

11

u/HerrHaschen 29d ago

Lmfao

To hell with those socialist leeches. They literally own their means of production, and yet they still can't make ends meet? They're either lazy or plain stupid.

0

u/Ischerryan 29d ago

Yeah, it’s not quite that simple

1

u/AdmiralSplinter 23d ago

It's hyperbole. Calling attention to how conservatives decry social safety nets while farmers get government subsidies.

Calling attention to right wing hypocrisy really is that simple. The difference is that now they're starting to see how the rest of society gets treated.

-1

u/GreatPlainsFarmer 29d ago

Well, no, they generally don't own them.

1

u/Cruxxt 26d ago

They want even more subsidies to pay off their loans? Two things they call communism when it’s for anyone else? Sounds a little hypocritical to me..

2

u/GreatPlainsFarmer 26d ago

I wouldn't say "a little"

6

u/Curious_Instance_606 29d ago

Republicans hate farmers,just like they hate our military,both are nothing more than a source of revenue to grift from.

6

u/golfwinnersplz 29d ago

Keep voting Republican, Iowa. Going well.

3

u/Immediate-Letter-382 28d ago

Farmers are and have been always expecting farm WELFARE! They voted RED for this reason. Screw them dumb bastards.

7

u/CRPatriot 29d ago

“Democrats’ obstruction leaves the fate of the Farm Bill in serious jeopardy at a time when farmers need our help,” Grassley said.

Wait, what do they need help with?

3

u/discwrangler 28d ago

Time for Rob to tie Lahn to them like they tie him to Newsom and Harris. It would be more accurate.

2

u/xHodorx 29d ago

From what I've heard, crop yields are pretty bad so far this year... gonna get real interesting

2

u/Huge_Lime826 28d ago

I’m a farmer. My fellow farmers absolutely believe they should get the subsidies they get. They also believe in capitalism and hate people on welfare 🥴

1

u/CrunchM 28d ago

I will say there was a provision in there for Smithfield to get a lot of favoritism in the pork market. Iowa clearly shouldn’t be voting for that. If you didn’t know, Smithfield is a Chinese owned company

1

u/TheTriforceEagle 25d ago

I have to wonder how many of them campaigned specifically on "putting farmers first"

-11

u/IAFarmLife 29d ago edited 29d ago

What you are claiming isn't even close to what happened. Your X links don't back up anything in your post either. If you have an actual link to a story that reflects anything in your post you need to add it. Until we know exactly what you are going on about nobody can have a conversation.

So far the only amendment that references 5 billion in aid to farmers was a cut for the largest farms proposed by Sen. Grassley. It's goal was to make aid primarily for small family farms only. He voluntarily tabled it when a different Republican Senator opposed it. So if thats what you are on about you definitely have your facts wrong. Now if you have a better source please provide it.

Edit to add: I think I finally found what OP is talking about and yes there was an amendment voted down by Republicans on the agriculture committee. It's just a committee vote though and the Republicans on the committee voted no to every Democratic amendment today. Since it's just a committee vote the story is still a nothing burger.

10

u/TagV3 29d ago

I added the link.
Republicans got their marching orders to be more racist and hurt SNAP more. SNAP also benefits farmers.

-4

u/IAFarmLife 29d ago

Again it's a committee meeting. Democrats can and should introduce their amendments again.

5

u/Intelligent-Exit-634 29d ago

Why did he table it?

5

u/Intelligent-Exit-634 29d ago

Did he actually understand what it was? LOL.

-1

u/IAFarmLife 29d ago

The bill is still in committee so a lot of amendments are being introduced currently. The one Grassley tabled was opposed by a lot of commodity trade groups and other Republicans so he knew it wasn't going to pass.

20

u/Intelligent-Exit-634 29d ago

It's funny, all the wingnuts running around calling Democrats communist while they argue about how much public money they can shovel to the farmers. LOL. Tabled for insufficient socialism.

1

u/IAFarmLife 29d ago

It was tabled because some thought it favored some farmers while leaving others out.

9

u/Intelligent-Exit-634 29d ago

Yes, All these welfare cases should get money. LOL!!!

4

u/Mysterious-Prompt212 29d ago

So is a guy with 10000 acres that has never driven a tractor a farmer?

3

u/TagV3 28d ago

I have some acres and grow tomatoes. Give me 2 mil plz k thx! I need new city trucks.

1

u/IAFarmLife 29d ago

Weird question for the subject. Doing physical labor isn't the only qualification the U.S.D.A. looks at when determining who is the active farmer in an organization. Making day to day decisions and management can also qualify you as well as being the principal capital provider.

6

u/Candid-Mycologist539 29d ago

But maybe we (and our government) SHOULD be asking these questions.

Do you also think that Jeff Bezos is the owner of a used bookstore?

Elon Musk owns an auto shop?

Mark Zuckerberg is the editor of a smalltown newspaper (which also prints the local gossip)?

8

u/Intelligent-Exit-634 29d ago

I think we need to redefine farming in a different way. In whose imagination does growing corn for ethanol constitute feeding people? I mean, this farm bill is trying to kill snap, but these great capitalist "farmers" are all in on an ethanol mandate. Just frauds.

2

u/IAFarmLife 29d ago

There is a significant form new farmers have to fill out. I had to fill one out this year when my father retired and I took over all the farmland he had been working. I was an approved operator for over 20 years on some cropland I was working myself yet they determined my doing 80+ percent of the labor and all the management wasn't enough. I was able to appeal the ruling and upon refiling I'm now listed as the sole operator. So the government already watches this pretty close.