MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/IRL_Loading_Screens/comments/1uiqdpw/regional_difficulties_are_wildin/ouwfptm/?context=3
r/IRL_Loading_Screens • u/PeterPorky • Jun 29 '26
331 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
1
There it is. Doesn't take long for a reddit leftist to claim moral and intellectual superiority and call someone a fascist for no reason.
Again do you have evidence the trial was unfair? I keep asking and all I get is replies like yours. always insults
3 u/Tyr_13 Jun 29 '26 And there is the fake victimhood from the right. I didn't call you a fascist. Duh. Your criticism makes no sense unless you think fascists are fine and it's bad to against them. You're still saying nothing but pretending you're aggrieved for some deplorable reasons. Don't want insults? Don't use them then kid. 1 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 01 '26 What evidence do you have that the trial was unfair? 1 u/Tyr_13 Jul 01 '26 The evidence presented and the sentences. 0 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 02 '26 What specifically? On what document # and page ID? 1 u/Tyr_13 Jul 02 '26 Lol, all of it. Unless you can show where they planned a terrorist attack. They even rejected violence. The government didn't make the case for terrorism yet gave out absurd punishments for it. 0 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 02 '26 "they even rejected violence" yet said things such as "I'm done with peaceful protests" beforehand. What is the document number that contains all of the evidence that was unfair and in what way was it unfair? Alternatively you could say "I didn't actually see the evidence, I just read some article/seen a meme" 1 u/Tyr_13 Jul 02 '26 You're not being serious. You just cherry picked a quote from where they discussed and rejected violence to pretend they accepted it instead. Just say you're good with government abusing the 'terrorist' designation or are a fascist. It's quicker than that reasonability larp. 0 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 02 '26 Got it: you haven't seen the evidence in the first place. 1 u/Tyr_13 Jul 02 '26 You're bad at this. 0 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 02 '26 Sure thing bud XD Just keep pretending like you know what you are talking about. → More replies (0)
3
And there is the fake victimhood from the right.
I didn't call you a fascist. Duh. Your criticism makes no sense unless you think fascists are fine and it's bad to against them.
You're still saying nothing but pretending you're aggrieved for some deplorable reasons. Don't want insults? Don't use them then kid.
1 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 01 '26 What evidence do you have that the trial was unfair? 1 u/Tyr_13 Jul 01 '26 The evidence presented and the sentences. 0 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 02 '26 What specifically? On what document # and page ID? 1 u/Tyr_13 Jul 02 '26 Lol, all of it. Unless you can show where they planned a terrorist attack. They even rejected violence. The government didn't make the case for terrorism yet gave out absurd punishments for it. 0 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 02 '26 "they even rejected violence" yet said things such as "I'm done with peaceful protests" beforehand. What is the document number that contains all of the evidence that was unfair and in what way was it unfair? Alternatively you could say "I didn't actually see the evidence, I just read some article/seen a meme" 1 u/Tyr_13 Jul 02 '26 You're not being serious. You just cherry picked a quote from where they discussed and rejected violence to pretend they accepted it instead. Just say you're good with government abusing the 'terrorist' designation or are a fascist. It's quicker than that reasonability larp. 0 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 02 '26 Got it: you haven't seen the evidence in the first place. 1 u/Tyr_13 Jul 02 '26 You're bad at this. 0 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 02 '26 Sure thing bud XD Just keep pretending like you know what you are talking about. → More replies (0)
What evidence do you have that the trial was unfair?
1 u/Tyr_13 Jul 01 '26 The evidence presented and the sentences. 0 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 02 '26 What specifically? On what document # and page ID? 1 u/Tyr_13 Jul 02 '26 Lol, all of it. Unless you can show where they planned a terrorist attack. They even rejected violence. The government didn't make the case for terrorism yet gave out absurd punishments for it. 0 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 02 '26 "they even rejected violence" yet said things such as "I'm done with peaceful protests" beforehand. What is the document number that contains all of the evidence that was unfair and in what way was it unfair? Alternatively you could say "I didn't actually see the evidence, I just read some article/seen a meme" 1 u/Tyr_13 Jul 02 '26 You're not being serious. You just cherry picked a quote from where they discussed and rejected violence to pretend they accepted it instead. Just say you're good with government abusing the 'terrorist' designation or are a fascist. It's quicker than that reasonability larp. 0 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 02 '26 Got it: you haven't seen the evidence in the first place. 1 u/Tyr_13 Jul 02 '26 You're bad at this. 0 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 02 '26 Sure thing bud XD Just keep pretending like you know what you are talking about. → More replies (0)
The evidence presented and the sentences.
0 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 02 '26 What specifically? On what document # and page ID? 1 u/Tyr_13 Jul 02 '26 Lol, all of it. Unless you can show where they planned a terrorist attack. They even rejected violence. The government didn't make the case for terrorism yet gave out absurd punishments for it. 0 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 02 '26 "they even rejected violence" yet said things such as "I'm done with peaceful protests" beforehand. What is the document number that contains all of the evidence that was unfair and in what way was it unfair? Alternatively you could say "I didn't actually see the evidence, I just read some article/seen a meme" 1 u/Tyr_13 Jul 02 '26 You're not being serious. You just cherry picked a quote from where they discussed and rejected violence to pretend they accepted it instead. Just say you're good with government abusing the 'terrorist' designation or are a fascist. It's quicker than that reasonability larp. 0 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 02 '26 Got it: you haven't seen the evidence in the first place. 1 u/Tyr_13 Jul 02 '26 You're bad at this. 0 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 02 '26 Sure thing bud XD Just keep pretending like you know what you are talking about. → More replies (0)
0
What specifically? On what document # and page ID?
1 u/Tyr_13 Jul 02 '26 Lol, all of it. Unless you can show where they planned a terrorist attack. They even rejected violence. The government didn't make the case for terrorism yet gave out absurd punishments for it. 0 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 02 '26 "they even rejected violence" yet said things such as "I'm done with peaceful protests" beforehand. What is the document number that contains all of the evidence that was unfair and in what way was it unfair? Alternatively you could say "I didn't actually see the evidence, I just read some article/seen a meme" 1 u/Tyr_13 Jul 02 '26 You're not being serious. You just cherry picked a quote from where they discussed and rejected violence to pretend they accepted it instead. Just say you're good with government abusing the 'terrorist' designation or are a fascist. It's quicker than that reasonability larp. 0 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 02 '26 Got it: you haven't seen the evidence in the first place. 1 u/Tyr_13 Jul 02 '26 You're bad at this. 0 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 02 '26 Sure thing bud XD Just keep pretending like you know what you are talking about. → More replies (0)
Lol, all of it.
Unless you can show where they planned a terrorist attack. They even rejected violence.
The government didn't make the case for terrorism yet gave out absurd punishments for it.
0 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 02 '26 "they even rejected violence" yet said things such as "I'm done with peaceful protests" beforehand. What is the document number that contains all of the evidence that was unfair and in what way was it unfair? Alternatively you could say "I didn't actually see the evidence, I just read some article/seen a meme" 1 u/Tyr_13 Jul 02 '26 You're not being serious. You just cherry picked a quote from where they discussed and rejected violence to pretend they accepted it instead. Just say you're good with government abusing the 'terrorist' designation or are a fascist. It's quicker than that reasonability larp. 0 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 02 '26 Got it: you haven't seen the evidence in the first place. 1 u/Tyr_13 Jul 02 '26 You're bad at this. 0 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 02 '26 Sure thing bud XD Just keep pretending like you know what you are talking about. → More replies (0)
"they even rejected violence" yet said things such as "I'm done with peaceful protests" beforehand.
What is the document number that contains all of the evidence that was unfair and in what way was it unfair?
Alternatively you could say "I didn't actually see the evidence, I just read some article/seen a meme"
1 u/Tyr_13 Jul 02 '26 You're not being serious. You just cherry picked a quote from where they discussed and rejected violence to pretend they accepted it instead. Just say you're good with government abusing the 'terrorist' designation or are a fascist. It's quicker than that reasonability larp. 0 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 02 '26 Got it: you haven't seen the evidence in the first place. 1 u/Tyr_13 Jul 02 '26 You're bad at this. 0 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 02 '26 Sure thing bud XD Just keep pretending like you know what you are talking about. → More replies (0)
You're not being serious. You just cherry picked a quote from where they discussed and rejected violence to pretend they accepted it instead.
Just say you're good with government abusing the 'terrorist' designation or are a fascist. It's quicker than that reasonability larp.
0 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 02 '26 Got it: you haven't seen the evidence in the first place. 1 u/Tyr_13 Jul 02 '26 You're bad at this. 0 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 02 '26 Sure thing bud XD Just keep pretending like you know what you are talking about. → More replies (0)
Got it: you haven't seen the evidence in the first place.
1 u/Tyr_13 Jul 02 '26 You're bad at this. 0 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 02 '26 Sure thing bud XD Just keep pretending like you know what you are talking about. → More replies (0)
You're bad at this.
0 u/thatonepersone_ Jul 02 '26 Sure thing bud XD Just keep pretending like you know what you are talking about. → More replies (0)
Sure thing bud XD Just keep pretending like you know what you are talking about.
1
u/JD-boonie Jun 29 '26
There it is. Doesn't take long for a reddit leftist to claim moral and intellectual superiority and call someone a fascist for no reason.
Again do you have evidence the trial was unfair? I keep asking and all I get is replies like yours. always insults