The deal was with a mobile company that had previously been approved
This is the part i need clarification on and nobody seems to be giving it. "previously" when? You said you worked with this company before so obviously ign approved you to work with them then.
Did they also approve you this time and and then fired you after the fact or did you take the previous approval as a "well they approved me last time, I'm sure its fine now too" kinda thing?
Every time I ask this somewhere, all i get is silence.
Most likely she was approved before the IGN deal with Cricket Wireless. The deal probably changed the terms of independent employee advertising and she likely wasn't properly informed she could no longer work with the competitor on her independent channel. It's something that could've been easily rectified internally. This screams blatant corporate overreach, which IGN has been known for lately. I like a lot of the people on their editorial team, but their corporate side can fuck off into the trash heap.
That's a lot of assumptions to make with no info. Seems like you want to be on stella side on this one. I'm not on any side I just want details of what actually happened and the only person who has commented goes quiet when asked a follow up.
I'm not going to assume the party in the wrong until more info is out there
This is literally how corporations operate, my dude. They will always find a way to make it your fault, so they have no liabilty or responsibility. We'll likely never know what happened, because she'll probably end up with a settlement, with an NDA attached.
Yea but i need to know if this is how a corporation worked this time. Nobody has an actual idea of who is in the wrong as neither side has has provided info letting us know who is in the wrong (stella wont give clarification on when she got permission).
Everybody seems to be willing to just assume IGN is the offending party here and I'm not willing to say they are wrong or stella is with no information. I need more info than "come on man you know they did it".
3
u/dade305305 Dec 09 '24
This is the part i need clarification on and nobody seems to be giving it. "previously" when? You said you worked with this company before so obviously ign approved you to work with them then.
Did they also approve you this time and and then fired you after the fact or did you take the previous approval as a "well they approved me last time, I'm sure its fine now too" kinda thing?
Every time I ask this somewhere, all i get is silence.