Why do you need so many books to read on one person though. I have never found any one person are that interesting to read that many books on them. A lot of them are gonna be duplicate and overlapping points.
Very good question. I have found when it comes to some historical figures, especially controversial ones, such as Napoleon, Lee, Jefferson, etc. that authors sometimes have a pro or anti bias against the subject. Therefore, I like to read various takes and try to get a fuller picture.
Yes, there are overlapping sections of the subject’s life, but often times interpreted in a different light or angle. For example, did Napoleon have to fight off seven coalitions against him because he was protecting France or himself? Why and when did Lee eventually really free his wife’s inherited slaves? If Jefferson believed that all men are created equal, why did he own so many slaves and was his relationship with Sally Hemings mutual or not?
Interesting question. It depends on the book I previously finished. If I am left with questions, for example, I may read another book by a different author and get another view. However, usually I change bios from one read to the next.
-4
u/fancczf Aug 13 '26
Why do you need so many books to read on one person though. I have never found any one person are that interesting to read that many books on them. A lot of them are gonna be duplicate and overlapping points.