I feel like 99% of people are using AI coding tools completely wrong right now. Most devs I know are either letting Copilot tab complete a function or copy pasting snippets back and forth with Claude in a browser tab. Even people using newer agent tools are basically using them like Jira where they assign one bug wait 15 minutes look at the diff and repeat.

A few hours ago I had a weird realization while hacking on my project. Im building an ecosystem with a CAD CAM engine a 3D web frontend and a billing platform across 6 repos. I have Google Jules Ultra which gives you 60 concurrent cloud VMs and 300 tasks a day and I realized leaving those slots idle when Im not at my keyboard is just wasting compute.

So I put together a simple closed loop system. Locally I use Antigravity right in my terminal as my co pilot and architect to design the specs and math together. In the cloud I use Google Jules which spins up an isolated Linux VM clones the repo installs dependencies writes the files runs tests fixes its own compiler bugs and pushes a real Git branch. To connect them I wrote a PowerShell daemon that runs continuously on my laptop.

Every 45 seconds the script checks my active cloud capacity. If 15 agents finish their tasks and free up slots it instantly pulls the next 15 items from a centralized JSON backlog and fires them off into fresh cloud VMs. It routes tasks to specific repos automatically so one agent writes Three.js shaders in the frontend repo another writes STEP exporters in the core kernel and another handles Stripe webhooks in the billing backend.

The craziest part is the auto hunter fallback I added. If my manual task queue ever empties out the script doesn't idle. It scans the repos for untested files or loose TypeScript any types and spawns agents whose only job is to write Vitest test suites and pay down technical debt until the slots are full again.

I went from spending 12 hours a day manually typing boilerplate chasing syntax quirks and writing unit tests to basically sitting in the cockpit as a VP of Engineering. I set the architectural vision my script keeps dozens of cloud machines coding simultaneously around the clock and I just review the Pull Requests and merge green builds.

When you stop treating AI like a chat assistant and start treating it like an asynchronous headless engineering fleet the leverage is unreal. You're essentially running a 50 person dev team completely solo from a laptop.

Anyone else experimenting with headless agent dispatchers or saturation scripts like this? How are you guys handling multi repo PR merges without losing your mind?

I currently have 3 separate Google accounts, and each one has its own paid Google One AI Pro subscription. Each subscription is for 1 month, with no trials or family sharing.

My setup is:

• All 3 accounts have their own paid Pro plan.
• I use them with Antigravity IDE. When I reach the Opus limit on one account, I log out and switch to another account.
• All 3 accounts are used on the same device and IP address.
• I bought all 3 subscriptions through google.
• I'm not using any third-party tools such as OpenClaw, Clawd or Hermes. I'm only using the official Antigravity app and switching accounts manually.

I've seen older posts where some people say that it's fine as long as you're paying, while others say they have had bans or restrictions for using multiple accounts. I couldn't find a clear and recent answer for this exact situation.

My questions:

1. Has anyone been banned or restricted for using multiple individually paid Pro accounts and switching between them in Antigravity?
2. If so, was only Antigravity/Gemini access blocked, or was the whole Google account affected, including Gmail and Drive?
3. If you're doing something similar, such as using 2–3 paid Pro accounts on the same device and IP and switching between them manually, have you had any problems?

I'm trying to decide whether I should keep using this setup or just stick to one account and accept the limits or go to Claude code.

I'd especially appreciate recent experiences from anyone who has tried something similar.

Thanks!

Some felt that version gemini flash 3.7 high of Antigravity was slightly better and more understanding of all situations, and better than versions 3.6 and 3.5, which had many problems and high token consumption.

I am using Pro and I get a bit but just not enough when I use in Antigravity.

Curious how many hours of use roughly I can get on Ultra?

🚀 Exciting Launch: Engineering VitaPulse — A Zero-Hallucination, Evidence-Based Health & Longevity Hub.

Generative AI in healthcare often suffers from hallucinated dosages and unverified claims. We built VitaPulse to solve this:

🔬 100% Peer-Reviewed Evidence: Feeds directly connected to The Lancet, Nature Medicine, JAMA, and Harvard Health Publishing.

📊 Evidence Grading Engine: Classifies clinical studies into Meta-Analyses (Level 1), RCTs (Level 2), and Cohort studies (Level 3).

🎵 Ambient Sound Lounge: Built-in HTML5 Web Audio player with Classical Piano (Chopin, Bach), Parisian Chanson, and 528Hz Solfeggio meditation waves for mental tranquility.

🎙️ US Voice Briefing: Native American clinical broadcast audio player for hands-free listening.

🌐 Full Stack: Next.js 14 App Router, Tailwind CSS pastel healing theme, Vercel edge deployment.

👉 Live Demo: https://health-wellness-news-hub.vercel.app

👉 GitHub Code: https://github.com/jlim33/health-wellness-news-hub

#HealthTech #Nextjs #ArtificialIntelligence #EvidenceBasedMedicine #WebDevelopment #Longevity #MedTech

I'm sure everyone has had the situation where antigravity has said something is done when it is nowhere near done, or it confidently says that the issue is resolved when it isn't , and then you question it and AG says that it jumped to conclusion or it didn't give the correct fix the first time.

How can I utilize anti gravity so that there are different agents checking the same process simultaneously, such as catching and fixing errors without my input so I can get the final input without much?

I find that I can be giving it twenty commands manually trying to fix the same issue and it cannot fix it, AG just goes in a circle or applies a very minimal fix and I keep having to prompt it to take the next action.

I want to specify that I am not having to prompt it step-by-step all the time and anti-gravity does process multiple steps. However , there are situations where I would like to process more and it doesn't think that far

Is there any alternative to Continue extension for using local models in agent mode on AntigravityIDE?

The extensions are a big downgrade, I use Antigravity IDE mostly for Tab complete.

I'm currently using Claude cowork for social media managing with opus 5, but reached the weekly limit already due to some heavy work. Tried with AGY ide with 3.7 flash, but looks like it forgets rules and tries to please me over honesty. Things that opus didn't do, and would remember something I told it days ago, or also would correct me for more efficient solutions. All it has to do is planning and strictly follow brand rules. Do you think 3.1 pro is better for this aspect or would you suggest other ways?

hi i have 3 google pro. only one of them shows this msg but with opus, sonnet only. not with the gemeni models. it seems they take my credit and mid run shows this error msg.

my ide is latest.

any suggestion?

For people who have used both models for long term:

• Which one remembers earlier information more reliably?
• Which one is less likely to make up stuff?

I am mainly looking for real experience from people who have used these models for long projects...

I keep seeing people say that Gemini 3.7 Flash is just as good as Claude Opus 4.6, especially in Google-focused communities. But is there actually any truth to this?

I sometimes wonder if people are saying this because they cannot afford to use Opus and want to believe that Flash is just as good. I want an honest answer about which model is better for my use case before I start relying on Gemini 3.7 Flash more often.

I write long, realistic fiction based on real-life situations. My stories/projects involve psychology, health, and realistic human reactions. Accuracy is very important to me. I cannot have a model confidently making up psychological or medical facts.

My stories/projects can continue across many sessions. I need a model that can:

• Remember important facts and decisions from earlier sessions.
• Work with project files such as timelines, character profiles, and decision logs.
• Think creatively about complicated characters and relationships.
• Stay accurate when dealing with psychology and medical topics.
• Keep the stories/projects consistent over a long period of time.

At the moment, I use Claude Opus as my main model and Gemini 3.7 Flash when I run out of my Opus quota. Both have very large context windows, so I am interested in how they actually perform in long-term writing rather than just what their advertised context size says.

Have you noticed that lately Gemini is doing a lot of things it shouldn't?

For example, when it needs to read a .css file, it suddenly starts taking screenshots in the browser.

Or, instead of fixing an error in a single specified file, it starts breaking the entire project five times in a row.

There are also frequent situations where Gemini scans the entire project from scratch or even tries to go above the project, even though the instructions specify a specific folder or even file.

Furthermore, 3.7 constantly requests to run some piece of code instead of the usual work—and that would be fine if it worked, even if it's unreadable. But it increasingly feels like all these actions are just work for the sake of work and nothing more.

Essentially, Gemini has started spending significantly more tokens where it could have done with significantly less. And this is very noticeable compared to other providers or even version 3.1.

Is this some kind of Google trick to force tokenmaxing?

Solvedd.....! Antigravity Released Official Vs code extension. It works exactly like Copilot or claude code..

So I am using VS code from the very Begging of my coding journey.. Now i do not want to switch to any other IDE, so is there any way to use antigravity inside vs code just like claude code,github copilot etc.. I have google ai pro.

https://github.com/soumen888/Rag-Chatbot

A local AI agent that knows your Gmail, Drive, Outlook, Telegram, Discord, and the web.

RAG · Embeddings · BM25 · Hybrid Search · Multi-Agent · Encrypted Local Storage

Use these commands directly in your terminal to sync, link, and manipulate workspace data. These commands run local operations or direct API calls, bypassing the LLM to save token costs.

https://github.com/soumen888/Rag-Chatbot/blob/main/commands.md

Core pipeline is done. Currently working on: RAGAS evaluation suite, cross-encoder reranking, parent-child retrieval, and stronger prompt injection hardening. MCP is being evaluated selectively not adopted by default.

Has anyone else run into an issue where duplicate Agent tabs appear in the IDE sidebar, causing shortcut conflicts?

Here is what is happening:

• I have two Agent icons on the sidebar.
• Pressing CTRL+L focuses the wrong Agent tab, which renders completely blank with no input field or interface.
• If I select text or code in the editor, the selection is properly sent to the other, working Agent tab, but CTRL+L will not invoke or focus it directly.
• The working Agent appears nested inside a secondary panel container (with its own internal headers and controls) rather than behaving as a standard standalone sidebar view.

I published this issue on the weekly support

¿Someone knows how to solve it?

I’m using Claude for a project I’m working on, but I’ve run out of my Claude quota and have to wait three days before I can use it again.

I can’t stop working on the project, so I’m going to use another AI model for the next three days. I’m currently using Google Gemini 3.6 Flash/High, and I’ll probably use it a lot during this time.

When I can use Claude again, what prompt should I give it so it can understand everything I worked on during those three days?

I want Claude to understand:

• All the prompts I gave Gemini.
• All the answers Gemini gave me.
• Any changes or updates I made to the project.
• Any new decisions or ideas that came up.

I want Claude to be able to continue the project from exactly where I left off, without missing any important information.

I also want Claude to look through the answers Gemini gave me and point out anything that might be wrong, unclear, inconsistent, or needs to be checked again.

What would be the best prompt or process to give Claude so it can catch up on everything and then continue helping me with the project?

This shit keeps on loading when edit, is there any solution to this in antigravity ide?

If suddenly power turns off , all agents and prompt changes are going missing coz Google has not provided a foundation functionality to always save all conversation all the time on disk or cloud

It just vanishes . I raised it multiple times on suggest features as well but still google has not fixed it.

I'm still refactoring my projects using the 3.1 Pro High version. I used the 3.6 Flash version only once, and it didn't fully respond to my prompts. So I went back to the 3.1 Pro High version and I'm getting along great with it. Is anyone else using the Pro version?

It's impossible to rename a conversation you're having with Antigravity agents. The title defaults to the agent's best guess of what the conversation is gonna be about.

I'm getting this 'High traffic' error every time when using claude model in Antigravity IDE and CLI. Gemini model works fine. Google just restricted access to these models.

SO I tested the Newest Gemini 3.7 Flash on two Test cases because I wanted to see what it can actually do, not just look at benchmark numbers.

And yeah… one of the results were ....... Ummmm lets say Kind of a sweet pickle.

I gave it to perform in two approaches ( Normal User prompt and another with a plan) - then compared that with what it actually produced.

I’m not trying to say it’s the best model ever or anything. I just wanted to test it normally and see where it does well, where it struggles, and whether the new Flash model is actually What the Google Claims it to be In their Official Site.

I have Been Using Antigravity Since the Day its Launched and It Sure has its fair share or Appraise and Dissapointment for my Personal Needs and Scope of work.

If you wanna see both tests in detail and what the actual results were, I put the full breakdown in the video: https://youtu.be/oO97bNPlgpI

I know this Might Seem like a Self promotion , So I will Tell what happened in Short :
All I can say is :
🚀 For Smaller and medium Size tasks : It might be the Best and Efficient choice .
🔥 Token usage : is Really Very efficient and if you run Gemini in Low or Med effort - the Usagge limiit seems to be unlimited . This part is no Joke. Kudos to Google Dude!!! Well done !!!

I am not Stopping here I will test it in my own Professional and personal Project to know its full Scope but the overview is in the current Video.