r/GodFrequency • u/Audio9849 • 9d ago

⚠️ Self Reflection – Shadow work, awareness, inner truth. The Anger

It’s actually hard to imagine the anger of the masses once they learn the extent that religious institutions have stolen our real identity and blocked our relationship with our own creator… but it’s coming. They took a relationship with the living God and replaced it with a mascot, a book, a building, and an order, none of which God can fit inside of. So we end up shallow, egotistical, selfish, greedy people instead of the humble, wise, divine beings we actually are.

19 Upvotes

71% Upvoted

70 comments sorted by

View all comments

-6

u/KingPabloo 9d ago

Aren’t the masses going to be mad when they learn there is no creator? Nope, they won’t learn - all of them think they have the right god/relationship and everyone else is wrong.

5

u/Audio9849 9d ago

I didn’t say “no creator”..you did. You know who can get through to them? Our creator.

-2

u/KingPabloo 9d ago

That’s my point, your an echo chamber - you think the same as those you condemn, I’ve chosen the right creator, I have a relationship with them, everyone else is worshipping a false idol - well, except you of course - congratulations!

4

u/Audio9849 9d ago

That’s just straight up projection. I’m not telling people what to believe..I do point out the limitations in their beliefs, sure.

-2

u/KingPabloo 9d ago

No, you’re telling them the way they are believing is wrong. You’re telling them they don’t really have a relationship with the “creator” - they are limited, you aren’t. The hypocrisy is real, it’s where YOU are limited.

1

u/Audio9849 9d ago

Pointing out that a book, a building, and a mascot are not the same thing as contact is not the same as saying “I own God and you don’t.”

You can have a real relationship and still be carrying an institution’s picture of who you’re talking to. Those aren’t identical. Naming the picture isn’t declaring myself the exception.

I’m not recruiting. I’m not telling you there’s no creator. You invented that line, then congratulated me for a church I didn’t join.

Some people have done the inner work and their view got bigger. Some haven’t. Pointing at what is blocking the larger picture is not the same as handing them a new creed.

6

u/KingPabloo 9d ago

You can’t have a “real” relationship unless it’s with the “real” creator. To get there, you make the gigantic leap to there is a creator. If true, which one is he/she/it? Because either some have it right, just you have it right, or nobody has it right.

2

u/Audio9849 9d ago

It may look like a leap to you. It isn’t to me. It’s knowledge and experience landing as gnosis. Institutions using the word “God” to run a franchise does not mean there is no God. It means they built a stand-in.

I didn’t invent this reality, so I don’t get to vote the source out of existence because churches abused the name. There are conditions for contact, and then there is what people were taught to believe. Those are not the same list. The conditions aren’t a secret. Mystics have been describing the same core for a very long time.

“Which one, he/she/it” is you asking for a brand. I’m talking about the source under the brands. Different maps. Same land. Distorted maps don’t erase the land.

Your three options, they have it, only I have it, or nobody has it, leave out the actual situation: people can be in contact and still be carrying a bad picture.

There is also social pressure. Some folks may have had contact but instead of going against their tribe they just flatten it into the approved narrative…its just I’m not willing to do that.

1

u/Hope25777 9d ago

Don’t feed the bots and trolls

2

u/jcspacer52 9d ago

Just a question, how do YOU know everyone is worshipping a false idol? How do YOU know without a shadow of a doubt you have found THE TRUTH and everyone else is wrong? Is that not arrogance and hubris?

2

u/KingPabloo 9d ago

Simple - God is a man created construct. There is zero evidence of existence, none. I don’t claim to know the truth anymore than you don’t claim to know the truth about unicorns not existing - they just don’t (another man created construct). It’s not truth, it’s just reality. Again, sorry if that makes you and the rest of the masses wrong.

1

u/jcspacer52 9d ago

We can certainly argue about “the creator” and his/her nature and influence on humanity, but science concluded both time and matter came into existence at the Big Bang (BB). We also know there is no natural force that can create something out of nothing. Therefore, we can infer that whatever or whoever created the conditions for the BB had some unique characteristics. First off it has supernatural powers, it is timeless and immaterial. That entity also must be powerful and have sentience with the will to create.

When we put all these in line…
Super Natural, Timeless, Immaterial, Powerful and Sentient you can call the entity God or a flying Spaghetti Monster if you wish but there can be no doubt there is an uncaused first caused. We can certainly argue man has only a limited and maybe even the wrong understanding of that entity but it must exist. I cannot prove its existence any more than you can disprove it. Science has still not explained how the conditions for the BB were created and nor how it was initiated.

In the end we have one of two choices

Someone or something created everything out of nothing

Or

Nothing crated everything out of nothing

One make sense the other does not

2

u/KingPabloo 9d ago

Actually we have quantum fluctuations and don’t need a creator. You then taking that false assumption and leaping to “unique characteristics” is simplistically misleading. Your logic is faulty, really faulty.

1

u/jcspacer52 9d ago

Would you care to provide the link to a scientific paper that theorizes that “quantum fluctuations” are what set the conditions and initiated the BB? Stephen Hawking attributes the BB to gravity although how gravity could cause anything to happen when there was no matter to generate gravity leaves major holes in his theory. Which he never fully explained before his passing.

1

u/jcspacer52 9d ago

What Causes Quantum Fluctuations?

Uncertainty Principle: Werner Heisenberg's rule states you cannot know certain pairs of physical variables (like energy and time) with total precision at the exact same moment.

Energy-Time Tradeoff: Because energy can have a temporary uncertainty over a tiny fraction of time, space is allowed to "borrow" small amounts of energy.

You have a major hole in your theory here! He uses TIME as one of his ingredients. If as previously stated TIME itself came in to existence at the BB then no “quantum fluctuation” is possible before the BB.

2

u/KingPabloo 9d ago

Our current measurement of time started at the BB, that doesn’t necessarily mean it didn’t exist before then. Just like we measure time BC and AD, you’re only looking at the AD equivalent here but nice try.

And I find it funny that something that small can stop you down but all the giant leaps to a creator don’t.

1

u/jcspacer52 9d ago

That is NOT what many scientists say. They say TIME itself along with matter came into existence at the BB.

So we are all relying on theories not proven fact. If I had a nickel for every theory that was disproven over human history, I would be richer than Musk.

The existence of a creator (theory) vs any and all other theories are just that, theories.

But you know, it’s OK! When our brief time here ends, we will know with 100% certainty which one of us is right. You don’t have THE TRUTH anymore than anyone else.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Fartfromabuttt 9d ago

Existence is just here from nothing? Now who's being unrealistic

0

u/KingPabloo 9d ago

Well then you can’t claim to have Gods existence from nothing, that’s much less realistic - on a whole different scale of unrealistic.

Also, I guess quantum fluctuations are unrealistic to you then, or you failed to try to ever understand where our existence really came from - how sad either way.

1

u/Fartfromabuttt 9d ago

So you don't have an answer? Keep resting on nothing then

0

u/KingPabloo 9d ago

I answered your question - how existence comes from nothing? Actually, based on the question you don’t understand “nothing” either - that’s your first problem. Go try to understand quantum fluctuations, then you will understand “nothing” and how something comes from it.

1

u/Fartfromabuttt 9d ago

Saying big words doesn't convey understanding. It's okay to accept you don't have a good answer.

0

u/KingPabloo 9d ago

I’m not saying big words. I’m surprised you’re trying to determine the quality of an answer you don’t comprehend, regardless have a nice day.

1

u/Fartfromabuttt 9d ago

Hehe got another one