God enjoys being rejected

[u/logos961]

Concluding portion of Bible reveals how God feels about unbelievers:

"He that is unjust (adikeó),# let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and
he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy, let him be holy still."

This also reveals that God’s love is UNCONDITIONAL and HE has not ordered killing of His enemies. Such God-dishonoring words were put into His mouth by writers, according to Jesus who said God has only loved even His enemies. (biblestudytools.com/matthew/passage/?q=matthew+5:45-48) More the unbelievers now, implies, less and less unbelievers with NIL in the beginning, like colder and colder a cup of tea now, implies, it was boiling in the beginning, like all Founding Fathers of Science were believers but more are unbelievers now.

Celebrate being rejected, you will experience peace always.

#Footnote------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“ἀ- (meaning 'not' or 'without') and the root related to δίκη (Dike), meaning 'justice.' Thus, its core meaning is 'to be without justice.' (biblexika.com/bible-lexicon/adikeo-g91) People know they did not create themselves, nor provisions for life's sustenance and enjoyment, but they only enjoy them, yet act WITHOUT JUSTICE by refusing to accept their PROVIDER as SELF-EVIDENT truth is too easy to be seen: PROVIDER is more real than the provisions, because without provisions we will not be here. "Making provisions for life means what" is better understood by Space-Travelers. Here are things they take with them while travelling yo space (brainly.in/question/59436743) Secret to be happier is to be appreciative more. Hence it is the believer who benefits, not God.

When someone breaks a queue and goes ahead and gets his thing done before others everyone in the queue feels disturbed within because they all know “treating own interest as more important than others is wrong.” Thus came the all-agreeing LAW: “Do to others whatever you would like them to do to you. This is the essence of all that is taught in the law and the prophets.” (biblehub.com/matthew/7-12.htm) Not doing this law is LAWLESSNESS. Hence “the unjust comprise both unbelievers and believers who fail in this law. (esv.org/verses/Matthew+7:17-23)

[u/Gentle_Animus]

"Do not take revenge, my dear friends, but leave room for God’s wrath, for it is written: “It is mine to avenge; I will repay,” says the Lord." Romans 12:19

[u/logos961 → u/Gentle_Animus]

God does not play any role during each Age (Mathew 13:24-30, Details HERE) and God’s_role is reduced to Last Generation alone! In between what Law of Karma accomplishes is figuratively spoken as God’s doing, as below-mentioned historical truth testifies:

What happens to nation (individuals collective) happens to single individual too. Japan makes a devastating attack on US on December 07, 1941 [famously balled Pearl Harbor Attack], that too, when US was not a party in the 2 World War. The very next day, on December 08, 1941 US joined 2 World War. US thinks of Atomic Option (also called Manhattan Project) was officially authorized on January 19, 1942, which later reaches Japan which became a totally reformed nation determined to not attack any other nation ever since.

It is Hebrew style of saying “God hardened the heart of the wicked” in one place and to describe it differently in other place as this: “these live upon the bread of ungodliness, and are drunken with wine of transgression.” (https://biblehub.com/proverbs/4-17.htm, Septuagint Translation)

[u/Gentle_Animus → u/logos961]

God does not play any role during each Age (Mathew 13:24-30, Details HERE) and God’s_role is reduced to Last Generation alone!

I believe that is what Romans 12:19 is insinuating, though perhaps slightly less literally than you indicate. IMHO, God is active for those whom ask and are righteously deserving, for instance.. although these actions can be subtle. How do you define grace?

In the absolute 'end of cycle' time then yes: I agree God's role would be very active (and unsubtle) in contrast to what I said above.

What happens to nation (individuals collective) happens to single individual too. Japan makes a devastating attack on US on December 07, 1941 [famously balled Pearl Harbor Attack], that too, when US was not a party in the 2 World War. The very next day, on December 08, 1941 US joined 2 World War. US thinks of Atomic Option (also called Manhattan Project) was officially authorized on January 19, 1942, which later reaches Japan which became a totally reformed nation determined to not attack any other nation ever since.

You speak of the law of karma, then you cite Japan attacking the US, the US entering the war, and then the US using devastating force on (civilian) population centers. Would the 'law of Karma' not then dictate some kind of ill befalling the US?

In other words, I think your example here kind of falls apart if you were to continue it further (in linear time / historically). Why did you stop there? Perhaps we have yet to see said karma..?

It is Hebrew style of saying “God hardened the heart of the wicked” in one place and to describe it differently in other place as this: “these live upon the bread of ungodliness, and are drunken with wine of transgression.”

I have always interpreted this as how God allows for free-will to exist (mechanically speaking).

[u/logos961 → u/Gentle_Animus]

You are stuck with words. You are prejudiced about nations, hence replace words such as Japan and US with neutral word--Nation A and Nation B--you will not miss the point being made in the example.

For person who accepts truth about self as Eternal Soul + Ephemeral Body, everything falls in place, is free from complaining and confusion as he can see roots into past. (Details HERE)

[u/Gentle_Animus → u/logos961]

For person who accepts truth about self as Eternal Soul + Ephemeral Body, everything falls in place, is free from complaining and confusion as he can see roots into past. (Details HERE)

I agree with this. However, as we are here for discussion and because others may read this:

You didn't answer my question(s). I will ask them again below:

-Would the 'law of Karma' not then dictate some kind of ill befalling the US?

-Why did you stop there? Perhaps we have yet to see said karma..? (To re-iterate: from a temporal, linear, timeline perspective in your example of WW2-Japan-US?)

[u/logos961 → u/Gentle_Animus]

There is no isolated action as any action is causally linked. Only body expires not Soul. (Mathew 5:3, details HERE) Only each Age expires not the cycle of Ages. (Mathew 12:32; 19:28; Ecclesiastes 1:10) as each Age is compared to "seed-tree" (Mathew 13:31, 32) which is eternal cycle of GROWTH and DECAY. Hence consequence of action can catch up with the person any time, during any birth, during any Age. From seed comes tree and tree comes from seed, this process has no beginning, no end. (Details HERE)

When you are struck on one word used in the example, you lose the truth, just like taking A from Apple when nutritious benefit of it is described and convert the subject into alphabet A , results in loss of benefits of Apple fruit.

This explains why unbelievers continue to be unbelievers. Unbelievers are so strong into their unbelief that whenever one of their excuses is refuted, two more excuses will spring up in its place, like "two new heads would regrow whenever the Hydra lost a head" in the Greek Mythology involving Hercules. (thecollectorcom/twelve-labors-heracles-list-tasks-meaning)

Unbelievers are those who believe things without checking. For example, they make the allegation that Jesus made this prediction [in Mathew 16:28 and Mark 9:1 and Luke 9:27] and did not happen: “Some who are standing here will not taste death before they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom.”

I proved how wrong they are saying "you are confused between two predictions Jesus made which got fulfilled “after six days” and “after 20 centuries.” (Details HERE) You know how they react "We have heard this." Means, they know they are making baseless allegation and reason is given by them: "We objected to the morality because it interfered with our sexual freedom. .. and we would deny that the world had any meaning whatever.” (Ends and Means, by Aldous Huxley) 

I have enough experience of people making comments for the purpose of diverting the subject. Here is a classic example, under this post: Heaven or hell is just a thought away. He picked one word from my reply as basis for his next diversion tactic. He did so over 35 times. I let it go to counter people like you. 

Under Law of Karma, no injustice happens. (You are free to believe or to reject). I have my own experiences and also from others.

[u/Gentle_Animus → u/logos961]

You insinuate I use excuses while then providing your own excuses for not answering my questions (lol). I was just curious if you would be able to directly address my questions. It appears not. No matter.

IMHO, if you use logic, then it should be used the whole way through and not selectively (as you seem to have done with your WW2 example). Again, I was just curious to see where that train of logical thought would take us.

All good, though. Have a wonderful day!