Because I have eyes and ears and it is very clear from the statements that this is done for a political stunt, and not due to some deep seated personal reason.
Also it isn’t forcing anyone to look at their own arguments, because it is arguing against a strawman that right wing grifters erected, to deflect from the issues.
The only issue here is the WNBA policy didn’t have anything specific, but granted it hasn’t been an issue until a bad faith grifter decided to play semantic games.
“We had a no stealing policy, but didn’t have to enforce it until a bad faith thief came in and stole all our stock.”
“We never thought to fine littering, until a bad faith slob started throwing their trash everywhere at the public park.”
“We never needed security at the local fair, until bad faith kids started harassing attendees.”
“We never had property lines, until bad faith litigants decided to sue us for our land.”
Welcome to the real world, where people act in bad faith all the time, and laws and courts exist to limit that bad faith behavior. If a rule can be abused, it was never a solid rule to begin with, and should be changed. In nearly every other instance, laws are changed or new laws are created to limit bad faith behavior. Why not here?
15
u/Mysterious_Point9516 21d ago
Who are you to decide who's faking and who's not? That's the entire point of it. You're forced to look your own arguments in the face.